Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T15:04:17.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Use of Rietveld Pattern Fitting to Determine the Weight Fraction of Crystalline Material in Natural Low Quartz Specimens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2013

Bernard Jordan ,
Brian H. O'Connor  and
Li Deyu
Bernard Jordan
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical and Analytical Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria 3217, Australia.
Brian H. O'Connor
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Physics, Curtin University of Technology, GPO Box U 1987, Perth, W.A. 6001, Australia.
Li Deyu
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Physics, Curtin University of Technology, GPO Box U 1987, Perth, W.A. 6001, Australia.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Quantisation of low-quartz in crystalline mixtures has been performed by X-ray powder diffractometry (XRPD) for many years. Conventional methodology, using discrete-peak integrated intensities, is frequently performed employing calibrations prepared with natural low-quartz specimens. Previous research showed that from a conventional XRPD study of low-quartz specimens, the amorphous content of a suite of natural low-quartz specimens ranged from 1% to 28%. That study thereby underlined the importance in XRPD calibration of characterising the amorphous content (or its complementary quantity “weight fraction of crystalline material, WCFM” employed here). This paper describes an application of pattern-fitting Rietveld analysis for characterising the WCFM in a suite of low-quartz specimens. The results gave WCFM values ranging from 0.91 (esd, σ= 0.02) to 1.00(0.02) for six specimens for which the SiO2chemical content ≥ 99.5%.

Type
Research Article
Information
Powder Diffraction , Volume 5 , Issue 2 , June 1990 , pp. 64 - 69
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altree-Williams, S.(1977). Quantitative X-Ray diffractometry on milligram samples prepared on silver filters. Anal. Chem. 49, 429–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altree-Williams, S., Byrnes, J.G.& Norman, M.B.(1981a). Reference material for the quantitation of α-quartz in respirable dust by X-ray diffraction. Ann. Occup. Hygiene 24, 347–356.Google ScholarPubMed
Altree-Williams, S., Byrnes, J.G.& Jordan, B.(1981b). Amorphous surface and quantitative X-ray powder diffractometry. Analyst 106, 69–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bish, D.L.& Howard, S.A.(1988). Quantitative phase analysis using the Rietveld method. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 21, 86–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borg, I.Y.& Smith, D.K.(1969). Calculated X-ray powder patterns for silicate minierals. Mem. 122. Boulder, CO: Geol. Soc. Am.Google Scholar
Chung, F.H.(1974). Quantitative interpretation of X-ray diffraction patterns of mixtures. I. Matrix-flushing method for quantitative multicomponent analysis. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 7, 519–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Creagh, D.C.& Hubbell, J.H.(1987). Problems associated with the measurement of X-ray attenuation coefficients. I. Silicon report to the International Union of Crystallography X-ray Attentuation Project. Acta Crystallogr. A43, 102–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fazey, P., O'Connor, B.H.& Hammond, L.C.(1989). X-ray powder diffraction Rietveld pattern-fitting characterization of synthetic aluminum-substituted goethites. Submitted to Clays Clay Min.Google Scholar
Hill, R.J.& Howard, C.J.(1986). A computer program for Rietveld analysis of fixed wavelength X-ray and neutron powder diffraction patterns. AAEC/M112 Report, Australian Atomic Energy Commission, Lucas Heights.Google Scholar
Hill, R.J.& Howard, C.J.(1987). Quantitative phase analysis from neutron powder diffraction data using the Rietveld method. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 20, 467–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubbell, J.H., McMaster, W.H., Del Grande, N.K.& Mallett, J.H.(1974). In International Tables for X-Ray Crystallography, IV, 47–70. Birmingham: Kynoch Press.Google Scholar
Klug, H.P.& Alexander, L.E.(1974a). X-Ray Diffraction Procedures for Polycrystalline and Amorphous Materials. 2nded., chapter 7. New York: J. Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Klug, H.P.& Alexander, L.E.(1974b). X-Ray Diffraction Procedures for Polycrystalline and Amorphous Materials. 2nded., chapter 7. New York: J. Wiley & Sons. 365–368.Google Scholar
Nakamura, T., Sameshima, K., Okunaga, K., Susuva, Y.& Sato, J.(1989). Determination of amorphous phase in quartz powder by X-ray powder diffractometry. Pow. Diff. 4, 9–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Connor, B.H.& Chang, W-J.(1986). The amorphous character and particle size distributions of powders produced with the micronizing mill for quantitative X-ray powder diffractometry. X-ray Spectrom. 15, 267–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Connor, B.H.& Raven, M.D.(1988). Application of the Rietveld refinement procedure in assaying powder mixtures. Pow. Diff. 3, 2–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rietveld, H.M.(1969). A profile refinement method for nuclear and magnetic structures. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2, 65–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiles, D.B.& Young, R.A.(1981). A new computer program for Rietveld analysis of X-ray powder diffraction patterns. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 14, 149–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar