Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T18:15:44.580Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A synchrotron study of bladder urolith architecture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2013

K. D. Rogers
Affiliation:
Department of Materials & Medical Sciences, Cranfield University, Shrivenham, Swindon, Wiltshire, SN6 8LA, United Kingdom
M. W. Sperrin
Affiliation:
Department of Materials & Medical Sciences, Cranfield University, Shrivenham, Swindon, Wiltshire, SN6 8LA, United Kingdom
E. J. MacLean
Affiliation:
CLRC, Daresbury Laboratory, Daresbury, Warrington, Cheshire, WA4 4AD, United Kingdom

Abstract

The principal aim of this study was to assess a new approach to the characterization of uroliths using synchrotron radiation. To achieve this, a detailed investigation of the crystalline nature of a human bladder urolith has been undertaken. Changes in the phase composition and crystalline mineral nature have been measured from the urolith core center to its outer surface. Data were collected using a microbeam, synchrotron probe, and image plate. Rietveld analysis has enabled us to determine that the unit cell dimensions of the majority phases (anhydrous uric acid and calcium oxalate monohydrate) are significantly greater in the core region but become progressively smaller from the outer to inner regions. The crystallites of both phases are also shown to possess significant radial orientation which varies through the urolith and reaches a maximum at a point of principal fracture. The analysis has also allowed us to study the change in average crystallite morphology; the crystallites of both phases are shown to decrease in size toward the outer parts of the urolith although this is in a nonuniform fashion. Evidence of calcium oxalate dihydrate was also found, but only within the outermost region of the urolith.

Type
Technical Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Artioli, G., Masciocchi, N., and Galli, E. (1997). “The elusive crystal structure of uric acid dihydrate: Implications for epitaxial growth during biomineralization,” Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B: Struct. Sci. 53, 498503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asper, R., and Schmucki, O. (1984). “Etude de la taille et de la formation des cristaux dans des calculs urinaires par l’analyse des profils de raies de diffraction des rayons X,” Nephrologie 5, 159162.Google Scholar
Cheng, P. T., Pritzker, K. P., Tausch, J., Pittaway, A., and Millard, J. (1981). “Analytical scanning electron microscopy and X-ray microdiffractometry of renal calculi using etched plastic sections,” Scanning Electron Microscopy III, 163168.Google Scholar
Dorian, H. H., Rez, P., and Drach, G. W. (1996). “Evidence for aggregation in oxalate stone formation: Atomic force and low voltage scanning electron microscopy,” J. Urol. (Baltimore) 156, 18331837.Google ScholarPubMed
Iwata, H., Iio, S., Nishio, S., and Takeuchi, M. (1992). “Architecture of mixed calcium oxalate dihydrate and monohydrate stones,” Scanning Microsc. 6, 231238.Google ScholarPubMed
Iwata, H., Nishio, S., Wakatsuki, A., Ochi, K., and Takeuchi, M. (1985). “Architecture of calcium oxalate monohydrate urinary calculi,” J. Urol. (Baltimore) 133, 334338.Google ScholarPubMed
Kim, K. M. (1982). “The stones,” Scanning Electron Microscopy IV, 16351660.Google Scholar
Kim, K. M., and Johnson, F. B. (1981). “Calcium oxalate crystal growth in human urinary stones,” Scanning Electron Microscopy III, 147154.Google Scholar
Laing, M., and Kerr, A. (1991). “X-ray diffraction analysis of urinary calculi in Durban,” S. Afr. Med. J. 79, 407408.Google ScholarPubMed
Larson, A. C., and VonDreele, R. B. “GSAS-Generalized structure analysis system,” LANSCE, MSH805, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM87545.Google Scholar
Nelmes, R. J., and McMahon, M. I. (1994). “High-pressure powder diffraction on synchrotron sources,” J. Synchrotron Radiat. 1, 6973.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ogbuji, L. U., and Finlayson, B. (1981). “Crystal morphologies in whewellite stones: Electron microscopy,” Invest. Urol. 19, 182186.Google ScholarPubMed
Piltz, R. O., McMahon, M. I., Crain, P. D., Hatton, R. J., Nelmes, R. J., Cemik, R. J., and Bushnell-Wye, G. (1992). “An imaging plate system for high-pressure powder diffraction—The data processing side,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. 63, 700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ringertz, H. (1966). “The molecular and crystal structure of uric acid,” Acta Crystallogr. 20, 397403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schubert, G., Brien, G., and Bick, C. (1983). “Separate examinations on core and shell of urinary calculi,” Urol. Int. 38, 6569.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shirley, R., and Sutor, D. J. (1967). “Anhydrous uric acid: Nature and occurrence of a new form in urinary calculi,” Science 12, 544.Google Scholar
Sohnel, O., and Grases, F. (1993). “Fine structure of calcium oxalate monohydrate renal calculi,” Nephron. 63, 176182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sperrin, M., and Rogers, K. D. (1998). “The architecture and composition of uroliths,” Br. J. Urol. 82, 781784.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sutor, J. D., and Wooley, S. E. (1972). “The structure and formation of urinary calculi: I. Oriented crystal growth,” Br. J. Urol. 44, 532536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takasaki, E., Suzuki, K., Honda, I., Imai, E., Maeda, S., and Hosoya, T. (1995). “Chemical compositions of 300 lower urinary tract calculi and associated disorders in the urinary tract,” Urol. Int. 54, 8994.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tazzoli, V., and Domeneghetti, C. (1962).Mat. Natur. Rend. 3, 1962.Google Scholar
Young, R. A. (1993). The Rietveld method, IUCr monographs on crystallography No. 5 (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar