Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T06:03:55.085Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Specimen displacement error in focusing systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2013

Z. Sperling
Z. Sperling
Affiliation:
2085 W 5th Avenue, #304, Vancouver, V6J 1P8 British Columbia, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The error is investigated which results from the employment of tangential approximation in the calculation of line shift caused by specimen displacement from the recording circle in focusing systems (Guinier, Seemann–Bohlin). After an exact expression has been deduced and compared with the approximate formula in a numerical example, it is concluded that the error caused by the approximate formula may be important only in exceptional cases. The deduced exact formula is also compared with that given by Rafaja and Valvoda [Powder Diffr. 6, 200–203 (1991)] with the conclusion that both formulas are mathematically equivalent and complementary with respect to the theoretical and measured values of the diffraction angle 2θ.

Keywords

X-ray diffractionfocusing systemsGuinier cameraSeemann–Bohlin diffractometerspecimen displacement error
Type
Research Article
Information
Powder Diffraction , Volume 10 , Issue 4 , December 1995 , pp. 278 - 281
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brown, A. (1970). “X-Ray Powder Diffraction with Guinier–Hägg Focusing Cameras,” Aktiebolaget Atomenergi, Rep. AE-409, Studsvik, Nyköping, Sweden.Google Scholar
Brown, A., and Foris, C. (1983). “Precision and Reproducibility of Lattice Parameters from Guinier Powder Patterns: Follow up and Assessment,” Adv. X-Ray Anal. 26, 53–62.Google Scholar
DeWolff, P. M. (1948). “Multiple Guinier Cameras,” Acta Cryst. 1, 207–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofmann, E., and Jagodzinski, H. (1955). “Eine neue, hochauflösende Röntgenfeinstruktur-Anlage mit verbessertem, fokussierendem Monochromator,” Z. Metallkde 46, 601–610.Google Scholar
Mack, M., and Parrish, W. (1967). “Seemann–Bohlin X-Ray Diffractometry. II. Comparison of Aberrations and Intensity with Conventional Diffractometer,” Acta Cryst. 23, 693–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rafaja, D., and Valvoda, V. (1991). “Angular Corrections for the Seemann-Bohlin X-Ray Diffractometer,” Powder Diffr. 6, 200–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, A. J. C. (1974). “Powder Diffractometry,” X-Ray Diffraction, edited by Azaroff, et al. (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar