Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T23:34:45.147Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Solving the Crystal Structure of Cd5(OH)8(NO3)2·2H2O from Powder Diffraction Data. A Comparison with Single Crystal Data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2013

Patricia Bénard ,
Michèle Louër  and
Daniel Louër
Patricia Bénard
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de cristallochimie (URA 254), Université de Rennes, Avenue du Général Leclerc, 35042 Rennes cedex, France
Michèle Louër
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de cristallochimie (URA 254), Université de Rennes, Avenue du Général Leclerc, 35042 Rennes cedex, France
Daniel Louër
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de cristallochimie (URA 254), Université de Rennes, Avenue du Général Leclerc, 35042 Rennes cedex, France
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A comparison between the results of ab initio structure determination from X-ray powder diffraction data of a new cadmium hydroxide nitrate, Cd5(OH)8 (NO3)2·2H2O (SG C2/m), and those obtained from single crystal data is presented. The powder diffraction pattern has been analysed by an indexing method and fitting techniques. A total of 119 unambiguously indexed reflections has been extracted and used in subsequent treatment. The power of powder techniques to index the pattern and to find the structure model by normal Patterson and Fourier methods is clearly shown. The refinement of approximate coordinates has been carried out by the Rietveld method (444 reflections). The comparison of results with those obtained from single crystal data (2218 reflections) shows that the precision of positional parameter values is lower by a factor of 10, on average, in the powder study. These results are discussed in terms of crystallographic parameters (number of reflections used, number of parameters to refine, contrast between atoms) and, also, in terms of sample dependent properties (preferred orientation effect, impurity). Finally, the crystal structure has been derived from powder data with a precision probably sufficient for most purposes.

Type
Research Article
Information
Powder Diffraction , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , March 1991 , pp. 10 - 15
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albinati, A. & Willis, B.T.M. (1982). J. Appl. Crystallogr. 15, 361–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Attfield, J.P., Cheetham, A.K., Cox, D.E. & Sleight, A.W. (1988). J. Appl. Crystallogr. 21, 452–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Attfield, J.P., Sleight, A.W. & Cheetham, A.K. (1986). Nature 322, 620–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bénard, P. & Louër, D. (1990). Pow. Diff. 5, 106–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bénard, P., Louër, M., Auffrédic, J.P. & Louër, D. (1991). J. Solid State Chem., in press.Google Scholar
Cheetham, A.K. & Taylor, J.C. (1977). J. Solid State Chem. 21, 273–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, A.N., Lehman, M.S. & Nielsen, M. (1985). Aust. J. Phys. 38, 497–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eriksson, L., Louër, D. & Werner, P.-E. (1989). J. Solid State Chem. 81, 9–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frenz, B.A. (1986). SDP Structure Determination Package. College Station, Texas, USA, and Enraf-Nonius, Delft, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Louër, D. & Langford, J.I. (1988). J. Appl. Crystallogr. 21, 430–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louer, D. & Louer, M. (1972). J. Appl. Crystallogr. 5, 271–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louër, D. & Louër, M. (1987). J. Solid Stale Chem. 68, 292–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louër, D. & Vargas, R. (1982). J. Appl. Crystallogr. 15, 542–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louër, M., Louër, D., Lopez Delgado, A. & Garcia Martinez, O. (1989). Eur. J. Solid State Chem. 26, 241–253.Google Scholar
Louër, M., Plévert, J. & Louër, D. (1988). Acta Crystallogr. B44, 463–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plévert, I., Louër, M. & Louër, D. (1989). J. Appl. Crystallogr. 22, 470–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rietveld, H.M. (1969). J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2, 65–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rius, J. & Miravitlles, C. (1988). J. Appl. Crystallogr. 21, 224–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, J.C. (1985). Aust. J. Phys. 38, 519–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werner, P.-E. (1986). Chemica Scripta 26A, 57–64.Google Scholar
Wiles, D.B. & Young, R.A. (1981). J. Appl. Crystallogr. 14, 149–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, C.C. (1989). Acta Cryst. A45, 833–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, C.C. & Wadsworth, J.W. (1990). Acta Cryst. A46, 258–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, R.A. & Wiles, D.B. (1981). Adv. X-ray Anal. 24, 1–23.Google Scholar