Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T20:32:22.966Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Secondary excitation process for quantitative confocal 3D-XRF analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 May 2015

Kouichi Tsuji ,
Atsushi Tabe ,
Peter Wobrauscheck  and
Christina Streli
Kouichi Tsuji*
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Engineering, Osaka City University, 3-3-138, Sugimoto, Sumiyoshi, Osaka, 558-8585, Japan
Atsushi Tabe
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Engineering, Osaka City University, 3-3-138, Sugimoto, Sumiyoshi, Osaka, 558-8585, Japan
Peter Wobrauscheck
Affiliation:
TU Wien, Atominstitut, Wien, Austria
Christina Streli
Affiliation:
TU Wien, Atominstitut, Wien, Austria
*
a) Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Electronic mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

X-ray fluorescence (XRF) is a well-established method for quantitative elemental analysis. For accurate quantification, secondary excitation has to be taken into account. In this paper, the secondary excitation process was discussed for analysis by confocal micro-XRF. Experimental depth profiles were shown for a layered sample of Co and Cu. An additional peak was observed in the depth profile of Co, and it was explained by secondary excitation process. Additionally, a Mosaic model was proposed for quantification of confocal micro- XRF analysis.

Keywords

Confocal micro-XRFmatrix effectquantification
Type
Technical Articles
Information
Powder Diffraction , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , June 2015 , pp. 109 - 112
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ding, X., Gao, N., and Havrilla, G. (2000). “Monolithic polycapillary x-ray optics engineered to meet a wide range of applications,” Proceedings of SPIE. 4144, 174–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, W. M. and Kumakhov, M. A. (1993). “Application of X-ray and neutron optics,” Proc. SPIE. 1736, 172–189.Google Scholar
Hirano, S., Akioka, K., Doi, T., Arai, M., and Tsuji, K. (2014). “Elemental depth imaging of solutions for monitoring corrosion process of steel sheet by confocal micro-XRF,” X-Ray Spectrom. 43, 216–220.Google Scholar
Kanngiesser, B., Malzer, W., and Reiche, I. (2003). “A new 3D micro X-ray fluorescence analysis set-up – First archaeometric applications,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B. 211, 259–264.Google Scholar
Mantouvalou, I., Malzer, W., and Kanngiesser, B. (2012). “Quantification for 3D micro X-ray fluorescence,” Spectrochim. Acta Part B 77, 9–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakano, K. and Tsuji, K. (2009). “Nondestructive elemental depth profiling of Japanese lacquerware ‘Tamamushi-nuri’ by confocal 3D X-ray analysis in comparison with micro GE-XRF,” X-Ray Spectrom. 38, 446–450.Google Scholar
Nakano, K. and Tsuji, K. (2010). “Development of laboratory confocal 3D-XRF spectrometer and nondestructive depth profiling,” J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 25, 562–569.Google Scholar
Nakano, K., Nishi, C., Otsuki, K., Nishiwaki, Y., and Tsuji, K. (2011). “Depth elemental imaging of forensic samples by confocal micro-XRF method,” Anal. Chem. 83, 3477–3483.Google Scholar
Nakazawa, T. and Tsuji, K. (2013a). “Development of a high resolution confocal micro-XRF instrument equipped with a vacuum chamber,” X-Ray Spectrom. 42, 374–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakazawa, T. and Tsuji, K. (2013). “Depth-selective elemental imaging of microSD card by confocal micro-XRF analysis,” X-Ray Spectrom. 42, 123–127.Google Scholar
Schoonjans, T., Silversmit, G., Vekemans, B., Schmitz, S., Burghammer, M., Riekel, C., Brenker, F. E., and Vincze, L. (2012). “Fundamental parameter based quantification algorithm for confocal nano-X-ray fluorescence analysis,” Spectrochim. Acta Part B. 67, 32–42.Google Scholar
Smolek, S., Pemmer, B., Fölser, M., Streli, C., and Wobrauschek, P. (2012). “Confocal micro-x-ray fluorescence spectrometer for light element analysis,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. 83, 083703; doi: 10.1063/1.4744934 Google Scholar
Smolek, S., Nakazawa, T., Tabe, A., Nakano, K., Tsuji, K., Streli, C., and Wobrauschek, P. (2013). “Comparison of two confocal micro-XRF spectrometers with different design aspects,” X-ray Spectrom. 43, 93–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sokaras, D. and Karydas, A. G. (2009). “Secondary fluorescenec enhancement in confocal X-ray microscopy analysis,” Anal. Chem. 81, 4946–4954.Google Scholar
Tsuji, K. and Nakano, K. (2007). “Development of confocal 3D micro XRF spectrometer with Cr-Mo dual excitation,” X-Ray Spectrom. 36, 145–149.Google Scholar
Tsuji, K. and Nakano, K. (2011). “Development of a new confocal 3D-XRF instrument with an X-ray tube,” J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 26, 305–309.Google Scholar
Tsuji, K., Nakano, K., and Ding, X. (2007). “Development of confocal micro X-ray fluorescence instrument using two X-ray beams,” Spectrochim. Acta Part B. 62, 549–553.Google Scholar
Tsuji, K., Yonehara, T., and Nakano, K. (2008). “Application of confocal 3D micro-XRF for solid/liquid interface analysis,” Anal. Sci. 24, 99–103.Google Scholar