Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T19:34:22.100Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Rietveld texture analysis by neutron diffraction of highly absorbing materials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2012

H. M. Volz
Affiliation:
Los Alamos National Laboratory, P.O. Box 1663, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545
S. C. Vogel
Affiliation:
Los Alamos National Laboratory, P.O. Box 1663, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545
C. T. Necker
Affiliation:
Los Alamos National Laboratory, P.O. Box 1663, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545
J. A. Roberts
Affiliation:
Los Alamos National Laboratory, P.O. Box 1663, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545
A. C. Lawson
Affiliation:
Los Alamos National Laboratory, P.O. Box 1663, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545
D. J. Williams
Affiliation:
Los Alamos National Laboratory, P.O. Box 1663, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545
L. L. Daemen
Affiliation:
Los Alamos National Laboratory, P.O. Box 1663, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545
L. Lutterotti
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Ingegneria dei Materiali e delle Tecnologie Industriali, University of Trento, 38050, Italy
J. Pehl
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Planetary Science, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720

Abstract

We discuss the impact of strong absorption for thermal neutrons on data analysis and compare absorption corrections in the GSAS and MAUD Rietveld codes for texture and structural parameter refinement. Diffraction data were collected on the neutron powder diffractometer HIPPO at LANSCE from dysprosium and erbium, which are moderate-to-strong absorbers for thermal neutrons with absorption cross sections of 159 barns for Er and 994 barns for Dy at λ=1.8 Å. Both elements have hexagonal-close-packed (hcp) crystal structures, and the samples were various thicknesses of rolled foils. The orientation distribution functions (ODF) were fit to the same neutron time-of-flight data sets using two very different full pattern Rietveld analysis procedures. Spherical harmonics functions were fit to the textured data using GSAS. These data were also analyzed by the modified direct method E-WIMV using MAUD. The resulting pole figures from the ODFs determined by both Rietveld analysis packages are qualitatively similar, and the textures were confirmed by X-ray diffraction. Additionally, data from orthorhombic dysprosium and erbium fluoride powders show that atomic positions are not sensitive to absorption. We address inconsistencies and methodologies in data analysis when strong absorption is present.

Type
X-Ray Diffraction
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hopkins, R. H. (1974). Metall. Trans. MTGTBF 5, 11831188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson, A. C. and Von Dreele, R. B. (2001). Los Alamos Nat. Lab. Report LA-UR 86-748.Google Scholar
Sears, V. F. (1992). Neutron News NTNEEJ 3, 2637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spedding, F. H., Daane, A. H., and Herrmann, K. W. (1956). Acta Crystallogr. ACCRA9 10.1107/S0365110X5600156X 9, 559563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volz, H. M., Vogel, S. C., Necker, C. T., Roberts, J. A., Lawson, A. C., Williams, D. J., Lutterotti, L., and Pehl, J. (2005a). Proc. of ICANS-XVII, Santa Fe, New Mexico, April 25–29, in press.Google Scholar
Volz, H. M., Vogel, S. C., Roberts, J. A., Lawson, A. C., Williams, D. J., and Damen, L. L. (2005b). Mater. Sci. Forum MSFOEP 495–497, 119124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Dreele, R. B. (1997). J. Appl. Crystallogr. JACGAR 10.1107/S0021889897005918 30, 517525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenk, H. R., Lutterotti, L., and Vogel, S. (2003). Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A NIMAER 10.1016/j.nima.2003.05.001 515, 575588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xie, Y., Lutterotti, L., Wenk, H. R., and Kovacs, F. (2004). J. Mater. Sci. Lett. JMSLD5 39, 33293337.Google Scholar
Zalkin, A. and Templeton, D. H. (1953). J. Am. Chem. Soc. JACSAT 10.1021/ja01106a052 75, 24532458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar