Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T18:56:02.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On reproducibility of Rietveld analysis of reference Portland cement clinkers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2012

O. Pritula ,
Lˇ. Smrcˇok  and
B. Baumgartner
O. Pritula
Affiliation:
Institute of Inorganic Chemistry, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Du´bravska´ cesta, 845 36 Bratislava, Slovak Republic
Lˇ. Smrcˇok
Affiliation:
Institute of Inorganic Chemistry, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Du´bravska´ cesta, 845 36 Bratislava, Slovak Republic
B. Baumgartner
Affiliation:
STOE & CIE GmbH., P.O. Box 101302, D-64213 Darmstadt, Germany
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Weight fractions of four dominant phases (C3S, C2S, C4AF and C3A) present in the NIST Reference Portland clinkers 8486, 8487 and 8488 were estimated by a series of Rietveld refinements. Calculated powder patterns were derived from the structural data for monoclinic C3S and C2S, orthorhombic C4AF and cubic C3A. X-ray diffraction data were collected in two laboratories with two diffractometers, a reflection and a transmission one. There were no significant differences between the results of the refinements based on the data sets collected on the machines with different experimental arrangements. Estimated phase compositions were compared to the reference values found by optical microscopy (MPC). Median agreement between refined and reference values within ±5% (absolute) was found only for 8488 clinker; for 8486 and C3A-rich 8487 it was within ±10% (absolute). In the majority of the refinements numerical instabilities were detected, leading to large correlations between FWHM and temperature parameters of some phases. The results obtained for C4AF were probably influenced by the presence of possible solid solutions with the structures close to that of C4AF. Weight fractions of low abundant C3A were estimated with the largest relative errors reaching in several cases ∼100%.

Type
Technical Articles
Information
Powder Diffraction , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , March 2003 , pp. 16 - 22
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldridge, L. P. (1982). “Accuracy and precision of an X-ray diffraction method for analysing Portland cements,” Cem. Concr. Res. CCNRAI 12, 381–398. ccn, CCNRAI Google Scholar
Colville, A. A.and Geller, S. (1972). “Crystal structures of Ca2Fe1.43Al0.57O5 and Ca2Fe1.28Al0.72O5,” Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B: Struct. Crystallogr. Cryst. Chem. ACBCAR 28, 3196–3200. acb, ACBCAR Google Scholar
de la Torre, A. G., Cabeza, A., Calvente, A., Bruque, S., and Aranda, M. A. G. (2001). “Full phase analysis of Portland clinker by penetrating synchrotron powder diffraction,” Anal. Chem. ANCHAM 73, 151–156. anc, ANCHAM CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dollase, W. A. (1986). “Correction of intensities for preferred orientation in powder diffractometry: Application of the March model,” J. Appl. Crystallogr. JACGAR 19, 267–272. acr, JACGAR CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golovastikov, N. I., Matveeva, R. G., and Belov, N. V. (1975). “Crystal structure of the tricalcium silicate 3CaO⋅SiO2=C3S,” Kristallografiya KRISAJ 20, 721–729. krg, KRISAJ Google Scholar
Hill, R. J.and Howard, C. J. (1987). “Quantitative phase analysis from neutron powder diffraction data using the Rietveld method,” J. Appl. Crystallogr. JACGAR 20, 467–474. acr, JACGAR Google Scholar
Madsen, I. C., Scarlett, N. V. Y., Cranswick, L. M. D., and Lwin, T. (2001). “Outcomes of the International union of crystallography commission on powder diffraction round robin on quantitative phase analysis: samples 1a to 1h,” J. Appl. Crystallogr. JACGAR 34, 409–426. acr, JACGAR Google Scholar
Madsen, I. C. and Scarlett, N. V. Y. (2000). Cement: Quantitative Phase Analysis of Portland Cement Clinker, Industrial Applications of X-ray Diffraction (Marcel Dekker, New York).Google Scholar
Mander, J. E., Adams, L. D., and Larkin, E. E. (1974). “A method for the determination of some minor compounds in the Portland cement and clinker by X-ray diffraction,” Cem. Concr. Res. CCNRAI 4, 533–544. ccn, CCNRAI Google Scholar
Mansoutre, S.and Lequeux, N. (1996). “Quantitative phase analysis of Portland cements from reactive powder concretes by X-ray powder diffraction,” Adv. Cem. Res. ACEREN 8, 175–132. 9id, ACEREN Google Scholar
Mo¨ller, H. (1995). “Standardless quantitative phase analysis of Portland cement clinkers,” World Cement, September, pp. 75–84.Google Scholar
Mondal, P.and Jeffery, J. W. (1975). “The crystal structure of tricalcium aluminate, Ca3Al2O6,” Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B: Struct. Crystallogr. Cryst. Chem. ACBCAR B31, 689–697. acb, ACBCAR Google Scholar
Mumme, W. G., Hill, R. J., Bushnell-Wye, G., and Segnit, E. R. (1995). “Rietveld crystal structure refinements crystal chemistry and calculated powder diffraction data for the polymorphs of dicalcium silicate and related phases,” Neues Jahrb. Mineral., Abh. NJMIAK 169, 35–68. njm, NJMIAK Google Scholar
Mumme, W. G. (1995). “Crystal structure of tricalcium silicate from a Portland cement clinker and its application to quantitative XRD analysis,” Neues Jahrb. Mineral., Monatsh. NJMMAW 4, 145–160. nja, NJMMAW Google Scholar
Neubauer, J., Pollmann, H., and Meyer, H. W. (1997). “Quantitative X-ray analysis of OPC clinker by Rietveld refinement,” 10th International Congress on the Chemistry of Cement, Vol. 35, p. 3v007.Google Scholar
Nurse, R. W. (1980). “Principal paper phase equilibria and formation of Portland cement minerals,” Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on the Chemistry of Cement, Tokyo, Vol. 1, pp. 77–89.Google Scholar
Report of investigation (1989). Reference materials 8486, 8487 and 8488, National Institute of Standards and Technology.Google Scholar
Rodriguez-Carvajal, J. (1998). “FullProf98,” LLB (personal communication).Google Scholar
Scarlett, N. V. Y.and Madsen, I. C. (2001). “On-line X-ray diffraction for quantitative phase analysis: Application in the Portland cement industry,” Powder Diffr. PODIE2 16, 71–80. pdj, PODIE2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smrcˇok, Lˇ. (1995). “A comparison of powder diffraction studies of kaolin group minerals,” Z. Kristallogr. ZEKRDZ 210, 177–183. zek, ZEKRDZ CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stutzman, P. E. and Leigh, S. (2000). “Compositional analysis of NIST reference material clinker 8486,” 22nd International Conference on Cement Microscopy, Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar
Takeuchi, Y., Nishi, F., and Maki, I. (1980). “Crystal-chemical characterization of the (CaO)3⋅(Al2O3)-(Na2O) solid-solution series,” Z. Kristallogr. ZEKRDZ 152, 259–307. zek, ZEKRDZ CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, J. C., Hinczak, I., and Matulis, C. E. (2000). “Rietveld full-profile quantification of Portland cement clinker: The importance of including a full crystallography of the major phase polymorphs,” Powder Diffr. PODIE2 15, 7–18. pdj, PODIE2 Google Scholar