Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T13:27:09.460Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Neutron diffraction residual stress measurements of welds made with pulsed tandem gas metal arc welding (PT-GMAW)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2014

A.M. Paradowska ,
N. Larkin ,
H. Li ,
Z. Pan ,
C. Shen  and
M. Law
A.M. Paradowska
Affiliation:
Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (ANSTO), New Illawarra Rd, Lucas Heights, NSW 2234, Australia
N. Larkin
Affiliation:
University of Wollongong, Northfields Ave, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
H. Li
Affiliation:
University of Wollongong, Northfields Ave, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
Z. Pan
Affiliation:
University of Wollongong, Northfields Ave, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
C. Shen
Affiliation:
University of Wollongong, Northfields Ave, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
M. Law*
Affiliation:
Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (ANSTO), New Illawarra Rd, Lucas Heights, NSW 2234, Australia
*
a)Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Electronic mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Pulsed tandem gas metal arc welding (PT-GMAW) is being developed to increase productivity and minimise weld-induced distortion in ship-building. The PT-GMAW process was used in pulse–pulse mode to butt-weld two different strength and thickness steels; the residual stress and hardness profiles of the welds are reported and correlated.

Keywords

Residual stressdistortionwelding
Type
Technical Articles
Information
Powder Diffraction , Volume 29 , Issue S1 , December 2014 , pp. S24 - S27
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andritsos, F. and Perez-Prat, J. (2000). The Automation and Integration of Production Processes in Shipbuilding (Joint Research Center, European Commission, Ispra, Italy).Google Scholar
API Standard 1104 (2005). Welding of Pipelines and Related Facilities (American Petroleum Institute, Washington, DC), 20th ed.Google Scholar
Assuncao, E., Yapp, D., Suder, W., Ganguly, S., Williams, S., and Paradowska, A. M. (2011). “Characterisation of residual stress state in laser welded low carbon mild steel plates produced in keyhole and conduction mode,” Sci. Technol. Weld. Joining 16, 239–243.Google Scholar
CSA Z662-07 (2007). Oil and Gas Pipeline Systems (CSA International, Canada).Google Scholar
Hutchings, M. T. and Krawitz, A. D. (eds) (1992). Measurement of Residual and Applied Stress Using Neutron Diffraction, NATO ASI Series 216E (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht).Google Scholar
Hutchings, M. T., Withers, P. J., Holden, T. M. and Lorentzen, T. (2005). Introduction to the Characterization of Residual Stress by Neutron Diffraction (Taylor and Francis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida, USA).Google Scholar
Law, M. and Luzin, V. (2011). “Effect of spatial variation of stress-free lattice spacings on measured residual stresses,” J. Strain Anal. Eng. Des. 46, 837–841.Google Scholar
Law, M., Kirstein, O. and Luzin, V. (2010). “An assessment of the effect of cutting welded samples on residual stress measurements by chill modeling,” J. Strain Anal. Eng. Des. 45, 567–573.Google Scholar
Paradowska, A. M., Price, J. W. H., Finlayson, T. R., Lienert, U., and Ibrahim, R. (2010a). “Comparison of neutron and synchrotron diffraction measurements of residual stress in bead-on-plate weldments”, J. Press. Vessel Technol. 132, 011502.Google Scholar
Paradowska, A. M., Price, J. W. H., Finlayson, T. R., Rogge, R. B., Donaberger, R. L., Blevins, R., and Ibrahim, R. (2010b). “Comparison of neutron diffraction residual stress measurements of steel butt welds with current fitness-for-purpose assessments,” J. Press. Vessel Technol. 132, 051503.Google Scholar
Suder, W., Ganguly, S., Williams, S., Paradowska, A. M., and Colegrove, P. (2011). “Comparison of joining efficiency and residual stresses in laser and laser hybrid welding,” Sci. Technol. Weld. Joining 16, 224–228.Google Scholar
Webster, G. A. and Wimpory, R. C. (2001). “Residual stress in weldments,” J. Neutron Res. 9, 281–287.Google Scholar
Withers, P. J. and Bhadeshia, H. K. D. H. (2001). “Residual stress. Part 1 – Measurement techniques,” Mater. Sci. Technol. 17, 355–365.Google Scholar
Yudobidroto, B. Y. B., Hermans, M. J. M., and Richardson, I. M. (2006). The Influence of Pulse Synchronisation on the Process Stability During Tandem Wire Arc Welding (IIW Doc. No. XII-1910-06). (International Institute of Welding, Villepinte, France).Google Scholar