Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T17:33:14.898Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Improvements in XRF specimen preparation using the dried residue method: Gallium in plutonium metal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2012

Christopher G. Worley  and
Lisa P. Colletti
Christopher G. Worley*
Affiliation:
Los Alamos National Laboratory, MS G740, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545
Lisa P. Colletti
Affiliation:
Los Alamos National Laboratory, MS G740, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545
*
a)Electronic mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Preparing dry specimens from liquid samples for XRF analysis avoids introducing caustic or hazardous liquids into the instrument. Several modifications were made to a dried residue specimen preparation method for quantifying gallium in plutonium metal in order to improve the method accuracy and precision. Ion exchange chromatography was utilized to remove the plutonium prior to casting the dried residue specimens. This, coupled with several other changes, improved the method relative error from ∼5% to less than 1%. These results are sufficient for routine sample analysis and are almost comparable to results from the established process using liquid specimens. However, the analysis of radioactive liquid specimens is unnecessary for quantifying the plutonium gallium content using this dried residue approach

Type
Technical Articles
Information
Powder Diffraction , Volume 19 , Issue 1 , March 2004 , pp. 87 - 89
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Colletti, L. P.and Havrilla, G. J. (1997). Adv. X-Ray Anal. AXRAAA 41, 291–300. axr, AXRAAA Google Scholar
Link, D. D., Kingston, H. M., Havrilla, G. J., and Colletti, L. P. (2002). Anal. Chem. ANCHAM 74, 1165–1170. anc, ANCHAM CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martell, C. J.and Hansel, J. M. (1988). Los Alamos Unclassified Report, Report# LA-11435.Google Scholar
Meltzer, C.and King, B.-S. (1991). Adv. X-Ray Anal. AXRAAA 34, 41–55. axr, AXRAAA Google Scholar
Murata, M.and Murokado, K. (1982). X-Ray Spectrom. XRSPAX 11, 159–163. xrs, XRSPAX CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murata, M., Omatsu, M., and Mushimoto, S. (1984). X-Ray Spectrom. XRSPAX 13, 83–86. xrs, XRSPAX CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfeiffer, H. G.and Zemany, P. D. (1954). Nature (London) NATUAS 174, 397. nat, NATUAS CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Worley, C. G. (2001). Adv. X-Ray Anal. AXRAAA 45, 421–426. axr, AXRAAA Google Scholar
Worley, C. G.and Havrilla, G. J. (2000). Adv. X-Ray Anal. AXRAAA 44, 392–397. axr, AXRAAA Google Scholar
Worley, C. G. (in press). Adv. X-Ray Anal.Google Scholar