Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T07:31:56.238Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Improvement of X-ray reflectivity calculations on a multilayered surface

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 April 2013

Yoshikazu Fujii*
Affiliation:
Kobe University, Nada, Kobe, 657-8501, Japan
*
a)Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Electronic mail: [email protected]

Abstract

X-ray reflectometry is a powerful tool for investigating rough surface and interface structures. Presently, X-ray reflectivity is based on Parratt formalism, accounting for the effect of roughness by the theory of Nevot–Croce. However, the calculated results showed a strange phenomenon in that the amplitude of the oscillation because of interference effects increases in the case of a specific roughness of the surface. We propose that the strange results originated from the currently used equation because of a serious error in which the Fresnel transmission coefficient in the reflectivity equation is increased at a rough interface, and the increase in the transmission coefficient completely overpowers any decrease in the value of the reflection coefficient because of lack of consideration in diffuse scattering. In the present study, we present a new improved formalism that corrects this error, and thereby derives an accurate analysis of X-ray reflectivity from a multilayer surface, taking into account the effect of roughness-induced diffuse scattering.

Type
Technical Articles
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boer, D. K. G. (1995). “X-ray reflection and transmission by rough surfaces,” Phys. Rev. B 51, 52975305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daillant, J. and Gibaud, A. (Eds.) (1999). X-ray and Neutron Reflectivity, Principles and Applications (Springer, Berlin).Google Scholar
Fujii, Y. (2010). “Influence of surface roughness on near-surface depth analysis from X-ray reflectivity measurements,” Surf. Interface Anal. 42, 16421645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujii, Y. (2011). “Improved X-ray reflectivity calculations for rough surfaces and interfaces,” IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 24, 012009-1-21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujii, Y., Nakayama, T., and Yoshida, K. (2004). “Roughness estimation of polycrystalline iron surface under high temperature by small glancing angle X-ray scattering,” ISIJ Int. 44, 15491553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujii, Y., Komai, T., and Ikeda, K. (2005). “Depth profiling of polycrystalline layers under a surface using x-ray diffraction at small glancing angle of incidence,” Surf. Interface Anal. 37, 190193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holy, V., Kubena, J., Ohlidal, I., Lischka, K., and Plotz, W. (1993). “X-ray reflection from rough layered systems,” Phys. Rev. B 47, 1589615903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holy, V., Pietsch, U., and Baumbach, T. (Eds.) (1999). High-Resolution X-ray Scattering from Thin Films and Multilayers (Springer, Berlin).Google Scholar
Nevot, L. and Croce, P. (1980). “Caracterisation des surfaces par reflexion rasante de rayons X. Application a l'etude du polissage de quelques verres silicates,” Rev. Phys. Appl. 15, 761779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parratt, L. G. (1954). “Surface studies of solids by total reflection of X rays,” Phys. Rev. 95, 359369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sakurai, K. (Ed.) (2009). Introduction to X-ray Reflectivity (Kodansha Scientific).Google Scholar
Sinha, S. K., Sirota, E. B., Garoff, S., and Stanley, H. B. (1988). “X-ray and neutron scattering from rough surfaces,” Phys. Rev. B 38, 22972311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vidal, B. and Vincent, P. (1984). “Metallic multilayers for x rays using classical thin-film theory,” Appl. Opt. 23, 17941801.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed