Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T11:32:53.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Crystal structure of mupirocin form I, C26H44O9

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2016

James A. Kaduk ,
Kai Zhong ,
Amy M. Gindhart  and
Thomas N. Blanton
James A. Kaduk*
Affiliation:
Illinois Institute of Technology, 3101 S. Dearborn Street, Chicago, Illinois 60616
Kai Zhong
Affiliation:
ICDD, 12 Campus Blvd., Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073-3273
Amy M. Gindhart
Affiliation:
ICDD, 12 Campus Blvd., Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073-3273
Thomas N. Blanton
Affiliation:
ICDD, 12 Campus Blvd., Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073-3273
*
a)Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Electronic mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The crystal structure of mupirocin Form I has been solved and refined using synchrotron X-ray powder diffraction data, and optimized using density functional techniques. Mupirocin Form I crystallizes in space group P21 (#4) with a = 12.562 81(16), b = 5.103 63(4), c = 21.713 34(29) Å, β = 100.932(1)°, V = 1366.91(2) Å3, and Z = 2. Although the three hydroxyl groups and the carboxylic acid participate in a three-dimensional hydrogen bond network, the crystal energy appears to be dominated by van der Waals interactions. The Rietveld-refined and density functional optimized structures differ significantly. The powder pattern has been submitted to ICDD for inclusion in the Powder Diffraction File™.

Keywords

Bactrobanmupirocinpowder diffractionRietveld refinementdensity functional theory
Type
Technical Articles
Information
Powder Diffraction , Volume 31 , Issue 2 , June 2016 , pp. 118 - 125
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Accelrys (2013). Materials Studio 7.0 (Accelrys Software Inc., San Diego, CA).Google Scholar
Allen, F. H. (2002). “The Cambridge Structural Database: a quarter of a million crystal structures and rising,” Acta Crystallogr., B: Struct. Sci. 58, 380–388.Google Scholar
Altomare, A., Cuocci, C., Giacovazzo, C., Moliterni, A., Rizzi, R., Corriero, N., and Falcicchio, A. (2013). “EXPO2013: a kit of tools for phasing crystal structures from powder data”, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 46, 1231–1235.Google Scholar
Bernstein, J., Davis, R. E., Shimoni, L., and Chang, N. L. (1995). “Patterns in hydrogen bonding: functionality and graph set analysis in crystals,” Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 34(15), 1555–1573.Google Scholar
Bravais, A. (1866). Etudes Cristallographiques (Gauthier Villars, Paris).Google Scholar
Bruno, I. J., Cole, J. C., Kessler, M., Luo, J., Motherwell, W. D. S., Purkis, L. H., Smith, B. R., Taylor, R., Cooper, R. I., Harris, S. E., and Orpen, A. G. (2004). “Retrieval of crystallographically-derived molecular geometry information,” J. Chem. Inf. Sci. 44, 2133–2144.Google Scholar
David, W. I. F., Shankland, K., van de Streek, J., Pidcock, E., Motherwell, W. D. S., and Cole, J. C. (2006). “DASH: a program for crystal structure determination from powder diffraction data,” J. Appl. Crystallogr. 39, 910–915.Google Scholar
Donnay, J. D. H. and Harker, D. (1937). “A new law of crystal morphology extending the law of Bravais,” Am. Mineral. 22, 446–467.Google Scholar
Dovesi, R., Orlando, R., Civalleri, B., Roetti, C., Saunders, V. R., and Zicovich-Wilson, C. M. (2005). “CRYSTAL: a computational tool for the ab initio study of the electronic properties of crystals,” Z. Kristallogr. 220, 571–573.Google Scholar
Etter, M. C. (1990). “Encoding and decoding hydrogen-bond patterns of organic compounds,” Acc. Chem. Res. 23(4), 120–126.Google Scholar
Finger, L. W., Cox, D. E., and Jephcoat, A. P. (1994). “A correction for powder diffraction peak asymmetry due to axial divergence,” J. Appl. Crystallogr. 27(6), 892–900.Google Scholar
Friedel, G. (1907). “Etudes sur la loi de Bravais,” Bull. Soc. Fr. Mineral. 30, 326–455.Google Scholar
Fuller, A. T., Mellows, G., Woolford, M., Banks, G. T., Barrow, K. D., and Chain, E. B. (1971). “Pseudomonic acid: an antibiotic produced by Pseudomonas fluorescens,” Nature 234, 416–417.Google Scholar
Gatti, C., Saunders, V. R., and Roetti, C. (1994). “Crystal-field effects on the topological properties of the electron-density in molecular crystals - the case of urea,” J. Chem. Phys. 101, 10686–10696.Google Scholar
Greenway, M. J., Salt, S. D., Valder, C. E., and Curzons, A. D. (1997). “Polymorphs of Crystalline Mupirocin,” U.S. Patent 5,594,026.Google Scholar
Hirshfeld, F. L. (1977). “Bonded-atom fragments for describing molecular charge densities,” Theor. Chem. Acta 44, 129–138.Google Scholar
ICDD (2014), PDF-4+ 2014 (Database) edited by Dr. Soorya Kabekkodu, International Centre for Diffraction Data, Newtown Square, PA, USA.Google Scholar
Larson, A. C. and Von Dreele, R. B. (2004). General Structure Analysis System (GSAS) (Report LAUR 86-784) Los Alamos National Laboratory.Google Scholar
Lee, P. L., Shu, D., Ramanathan, M., Preissner, C., Wang, J., Beno, M. A., Von Dreele, R. B., Ribaud, L., Kurtz, C., Antao, S. M., Jiao, X., and Toby, B. H. (2008). “A twelve-analyzer detector system for high-resolution powder diffraction,” J. Synchrotron Radiat. 15(5), 427–432.Google Scholar
Louër, D. and Boultif, A. (2007). “Powder pattern indexing and the dichotomy algorithm,” Z. Kristallogr. Suppl.,” 2007, 191–196.Google Scholar
Macrae, C. F., Bruno, I. J., Chisholm, J. A., Edington, P. R., McCabe, P., Pidcock, E., Rodriguez-Monge, L., Taylor, R., van de Streek, J., and Wood, P. A. (2008). “Mercury CSD 2.0 – new features for the visualization and investigation of crystal structures,” J. Appl. Crystallogr. 41, 466–470.Google Scholar
McKinnon, J. J., Spackman, M. A., and Mitchell, A. S. (2004). “Novel tools for visualizing and exploring intermolecular interactions in molecular crystals,” Acta Crystallogr., B 60, 627–668.Google Scholar
Shields, G. P., Raithby, P. R., Allen, F. H., and Motherwell, W. S. (2000). “The assignment and validation of metal oxidation states in the Cambridge Structural Database,” Acta Crystallogr. B, Struct. Sci. 56(3), 455–465.Google Scholar
Spackman, M. A., and Jayatilaka, D. (2009). “Hirshfeld surface analysis,” CrystEngComm 11, 19–32.Google Scholar
Stephens, P. W. (1999). “Phenomenological model of anisotropic peak broadening in powder diffraction,” J. Appl. Crystallogr. 32, 281–289.Google Scholar
Sutherland, R., Boon, R. J., Griffin, K. E., Masters, P. J., Slocombe, B., and White, A. R. (1985). “Antibacterial activity of mupirocin (pseudomonic acid), a new antibiotic for topical use,” Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 27(4), 495–498.Google Scholar
Sykes, R. A., McCabe, P., Allen, F. H., Battle, G. M., Bruno, I. J., and Wood, P. A. (2011). “New software for statistical analysis of Cambridge Structural Database data,” J. Appl. Crystallogr. 44, 882–886.Google Scholar
Thompson, P., Cox, D. E., and Hastings, J. B. (1987). “Rietveld refinement of Debye-Scherrer synchrotron X-ray data from Al2O3 ,” J. Appl. Crystallogr. 20(2), 79–83.Google Scholar
van de Streek, J., and Neumann, M. A. (2014). “Validation of molecular crystal structures from powder diffraction data with dispersion-corrected density functional theory (DFT-D),” Acta Crystallogr., B, Struct. Sci., Crystal Eng. Mater. 70(6), 1020–1032.Google Scholar
Wang, J., Toby, B. H., Lee, P. L., Ribaud, L., Antao, S. M., Kurtz, C., Ramanathan, M., Von Dreele, R. B., and Beno, M. A. (2008). “A dedicated powder diffraction beamline at the Advanced Photon Source: Commissioning and early operational results,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. 79, 085105.Google Scholar
Wavefunction, Inc. (2013). Spartan ‘14 Version 1.1.0, Wavefunction Inc., 18401 Von Karman Ave., Suite 370, Irvine CA 92612.Google Scholar
Wolff, S. K., Grimwood, D. J., McKinnon, M. J., Turner, M. J., Jayatilaka, D., and Spackman, M. A. (2012). Crystal Explorer Version 3.1 (University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia).Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Kaduk supplementary material

Kaduk supplementary material 1

Download Kaduk supplementary material(File)
File 2.7 MB
Supplementary material: File

Kaduk supplementary material

Kaduk supplementary material 2

Download Kaduk supplementary material(File)
File 10.3 KB