Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T18:45:34.668Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparison of diffraction intensity using a monocapillary optic and pinhole collimators in a microdiffractometer with a curved image-plate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2012

Paul J. Schields*
Affiliation:
X-Ray Optical Systems, Inc., 30 Corporate Circle, Albany, New York 12203
Igor Yu. Ponomarev
Affiliation:
X-Ray Optical Systems, Inc., 30 Corporate Circle, Albany, New York 12203
Ning Gao
Affiliation:
X-Ray Optical Systems, Inc., 30 Corporate Circle, Albany, New York 12203
Richard B. Ortega
Affiliation:
Rigaku/MSC, Inc., 9009 New Trails Drive, The Woodlands, Texas 77380
*
a)Electronic mail: [email protected]

Abstract

The performance of a tapered, monocapillary optic was compared to double-pinhole optics by measuring the intensity and widths of powder diffraction peaks generated using Cr Kα and Cu Kα X-rays (46 kV, 46 mA). A microdiffractometer and curved image-plate system was used to collect diffraction patterns displayed by an alumina intensity standard. A monocapillary optic with a 20 μm beam width (measured at half the maximum intensity, FWHM) was compared to collimating pinhole optics with two apertures: one with 30 μm diameter pinholes and another with 50 μm pinholes. The average, integrated intensity of the diffraction peaks in the patterns collected using the 20 μm monocapillary optic was 6 to 7 times greater than the average diffraction intensity obtained with the 50 μm pinhole collimator and 25 times greater than the intensity obtained with the 30 μm collimator. The average increase in the FWHM of the diffraction peaks in the patterns obtained with the monocapillary optic was ∼2 times greater than the pinhole collimators.

Type
New X-Ray Optics
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Attaelmanan, A., Voglis, P., Rindby, A., Larsson, S., and Engström, P. (1995). “Improved Capillary Optics Applied to Microbeam X-ray Fluorescence: Resolution and Sensitivity,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. RSINAK 66 (1), 24. rsi, RSINAK CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balaic, D. X., and Nugent, K. A. (1995). “The X-ray Optics of Tapered Capillaries,” Appl. Opt. APOPAI 34 (31), 7263. apo, APOPAI CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bilderback, D. H., Hoffman, S. A., and Thiel, D. J. (1994). “Nanometer Spatial Resolution Achieved in Hard X-Ray Imaging and Laue Diffraction Experiments,” Science SCIEAS 263, 201. sci, SCIEAS Google Scholar
Bilderback, D. H., and Franco, E. D. (2001). “Single Capillaries,” Chap. 29 in Handbook of Optics, Classical Optics, Vision Optics, X-Ray Optics, edited by M. Bass (McGraw-Hill), Vol. III, p. 29.1.Google Scholar
Engström, P., Larsson, S., Rindby, A., Buttkewitz, S., Garbe, S., Gaul, G., Knöchel, A., and Lechtenberg, F. (1991). “A submicron synchrotron X-ray beam generated by capillary optics,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A NIMAER 302, 547. nia, NIMAER CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gao, N. (1997). “Capillary Optics and Their Applications,” Ph.D. dissertation, 78 pp.Google Scholar
Jentzch, F., and Na¨ring, E. (1931). “Die Forteitung von Lichtund Röntgenstrahlen durch Rören,” Z. Tech. Phys. (Leipzig) ZTPHAU 12, 185. ztp, ZTPHAU Google Scholar
Rigaku Corporation (2001). 3-19-12 Matsubara-cho, Akishima-shi, Tokyo, 196-8666, Japan.Google Scholar
Rindby, A., Engström, P., Janssens, K., and Osan, J. (1997). “Micro-distribution of heavy elements in highly inhomogeneous particles generated from μ-beam XRF/XRD analysis,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B NIMBEU 124, 591. nib, NIMBEU CrossRefGoogle Scholar
X-Ray Optical Systems, Inc. (2001). 30 Corporate Circle, Albany, NY 12203.Google Scholar