Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T15:21:14.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparative study of the isothermal solid-state reaction systems of kaolinite–Na2CO3 and kaolinite–quartz–Na2CO3 for coal gangue activation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2022

Kezhou Yan*
Affiliation:
State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory on Efficient Resource-Utilization Techniques of Coal Waste, Institute of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China
Yaru Guo
Affiliation:
State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory on Efficient Resource-Utilization Techniques of Coal Waste, Institute of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China
Yuanyuan Zhang
Affiliation:
State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory on Efficient Resource-Utilization Techniques of Coal Waste, Institute of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China
Yanxia Guo
Affiliation:
State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory on Efficient Resource-Utilization Techniques of Coal Waste, Institute of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China
Fangqin Cheng
Affiliation:
State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory on Efficient Resource-Utilization Techniques of Coal Waste, Institute of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China
*
a)Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Electronic mail: [email protected]

Abstract

A clear understanding of the solid-state reaction of kaolinite (Kln), quartz (Qtz), and sodium carbonate (Na2CO3) is of great significance for the process optimization of coal gangue calcined with Na2CO3. In this work, a comparative study of the isothermal solid-state reaction systems of Kln–Na2CO3 and Kln–Qtz–Na2CO3 was performed by means of X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscope, and energy dispersion spectroscopy (SEM-EDS). The results showed that the calcined products both for these reaction systems mainly contain different kinds of sodium aluminum silicates (e.g., NaAlSiO4, Na1.55Al1.55Si0.45O4, and Na1.95Al1.95Si0.05O4) and various kinds of sodium silicates (e.g., Na2Si3O7, Na2SiO3, and Na6Si2O7). The mass percentage of Na2CO3 played a key role in the phase transformation, determining the Na/Al/Si molar ratio of the formed sodium aluminum silicates. Compared with the reaction system of Kln–Na2CO3, the existence of Qtz inhibited the formation of sodium aluminum silicates in the reaction system of Kln–Qtz–Na2CO3. It should be noted that the formed phases both for these reaction systems were slightly different from that of the thermodynamical calculated results of Na2O–SiO2–Al2O3 using FactSage™ software. According to both the experimental and calculated results, a reasonable batching area for coal gangue activation was proposed that the addition of Na2CO3 should be in the range of 20–50% of the total mass of Kln, Qtz, and Na2CO3.

Type
Technical Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of International Centre for Diffraction Data

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chao, L., Wan, J., Sun, H., and Li, L. (2010). “Investigation on the activation of coal gangue by a new compound method,” J. Hazard. Mater. 179(1–3), 515520.Google Scholar
Cheng, F., Cui, L., Miller, J. D., and Wang, X. (2012). “Aluminum leaching from calcined coal waste using hydrochloric acid solution,” Miner. Process. Extr. Metall. Rev. 33, 391403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibsont, G. and Ward, R. (2010). “Reactions in solid state: reaction between sodium carbonate and quartz,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 26, 239246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, Y., Li, Y., Cheng, F., Wang, M., and Wang, X. (2013). “Role of additives in improved thermal activation of coal fly ash for alumina extraction,” Fuel Process. Technol. 110, 114121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, Y., Yan, K., Li, C., Cheng, F., and Lou, H. H. (2014a). “Effect of Na2CO3 additive on the activation of coal gangue for alumina extraction,” Int. J. Miner. Process. 131, 5157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, Y., Zhang, Y., and Cheng, F. (2014b). “Industrial development and prospect about comprehensive utilization of coal gangue,” J. Chem. Ind. Eng. 65, 24432453 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Guo, Y., Yan, K., Cui, L., and Cheng, F. (2016). “Improved extraction of alumina from coal gangue by surface mechanically grinding modification,” Powder Technol. 302, 3341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, F., Wang, W., Yang, X., Hu, Q., Zhao, H., Li, Y., and Li, P. (2008). “Ions dissolving properties of activated coal gangue,” Coal Conversion 31, 98101 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Jabłońska, B. (2012). “Sorption of phenol on rock components occurring in mine drainage water sediments,” Int. J. Miner. Process. 104–105, 7179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ji, H., Fang, M., Huang, Z., Chen, K., Li, W., and Liu, Y. G. (2014). “Phase transformation of coal gangue by aluminothermic reduction nitridation: influence of sintering temperature and aluminum content,” Appl. Clay Sci. 101, 9499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kubo, Y., Yamaguchi, G., and Kasahara, K. (1966). “Inverted phase relation in formation of nepheline and carnegieite from the system kaolinite-sodium carbonate,” Am. Mineral. 51, 516521.Google Scholar
Kubo, Y., Yamaguchi, G., and Kasahara, K. (1967). “Reaction processes to form nepheline-carnegieite minerals from various starting materials,” Mineral. J. 5(3), 213223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kubo, Y., Yamaguchi, G., and Kasahara, K. (1968). “Kinetic and electron optical studies of the reaction process between kaolinite and sodium carbonate,” Am. Mineral. 5(3), 917928.Google Scholar
Lambotte, G. and Chartrand, P. (2013). “Thermodynamic modeling of the (Al2O3+Na2O), (Al2O3+Na2O+SiO2), and (Al2O3+Na2O+AlF3+NaF) systems,” J. Chem. Thermodyn. 57, 306334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Q., Jin, H., Zhu, M., Li, H., and Wang, M. (2014). “Phases transformation and activity of aluminum and silicon during roasting process of coal gangue,” Hydrometallurgy of China 33, 222225. (in Chinese).Google Scholar
, Q., Dong, X., Zhu, Z., and Dong, Y. (2014). “Environment-oriented low-cost porous mullite ceramic membrane supports fabricated from coal gangue and bauxite,” J. Hazard. Mater. 273, 136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schairer, J. F. and Bowen, N. L. (1956). “The system Na2O-Al2O3-SiO2,” Am. J. Sci. 254, 129195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shi, T., Xu, B. W., and Shi, H. S. (2008). “The evolution of coal gangue (CG)–calcium hydroxide (CH)–gypsum–H2O system,” Mater. Struct. 41, 13071314.Google Scholar
Tosoni, S., Doll, K., and Ugliengo, P. (2006). “Hydrogen bond in layered materials: structural and vibrational properties of kaolinite by a periodic B3LYP approach,” ChemInform 37, 21352143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vassilev, S. V. and Vassileva, C. G. (1996). “Occurrence, abundance and origin of minerals in coals and coal ashes,” Fuel Process. Technol. 48, 85106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xiao, J., Li, F., Zhong, Q., Bao, H., Wang, B., Huang, J., and Zhang, Y. (2015). “Separation of aluminum and silica from coal gangue by elevated temperature acid leaching for the preparation of alumina and SiC,” Hydrometallurgy 155, 118124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yan, K., Guo, Y., Wu, X., and Cheng, F. (2016). “Effect of organic matter on the Rietveld quantitative analysis of crystalline minerals in coal gangue,” Powder Diffr. 31(3), 185191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yan, K., Guo, Y., Fang, L., Cui, L., Cheng, F., and Li, T. (2017). “Decomposition and phase transformation mechanism of kaolinite calcined with sodium carbonate,” Appl. Clay Sci. 147, 9096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, M., Guo, Z., Deng, Y., Xing, X., Qiu, K., Long, J., and Li, J. (2012). “Preparation of CaO-Al2O3-SiO2 glass ceramics from coal gangue,” Int. J. Miner. Process. 102-103, 112115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, L. J., Feng, Y. L., and Yan, W. (2012). “The current situation of comprehensive utilization of coal gangue in China,” Adv. Mater. Res. 524-527, 915918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Y., Xu, L., Seetharaman, S., Liu, L., Wang, X., and Zhang, Z. (2015). “Effects of chemistry and mineral on structural evolution and chemical reactivity of coal gangue during calcination: towards efficient utilization,” Mater. Struct. 48, 27792793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Yan et al. supplementary material

Yan et al. supplementary material

Download Yan et al. supplementary material(File)
File 4.2 MB