Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T22:39:39.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Application of two-dimensional XRD for the characterization of the microstructure of self-leveling compounds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 February 2012

Severin Seifert ,
Juergen Neubauer ,
Friedlinde Goetz-Neunhoeffer  and
Hubert Motzet
Severin Seifert
Affiliation:
Mineralogy, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg Schlossgarten 5a, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
Juergen Neubauer
Affiliation:
Mineralogy, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg Schlossgarten 5a, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
Friedlinde Goetz-Neunhoeffer
Affiliation:
Mineralogy, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg Schlossgarten 5a, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
Hubert Motzet
Affiliation:
Schoenox GmbH, Alfred-Nobel-Strasse 6, 48720 Rosendahl, Germany
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The two-dimensional XRD (GADDS) was used to characterize the microstructure of an applied self-leveling compound (SLC). A calcium aluminate cement based SLC was prepared on two different substrates (water absorbent and nonwater absorbent) to determine the vertical distribution of the crystalline phases. The application of the GADDS enables the detection of the phase composition of the hydrating mortar in horizontal slices. Thus the analysis could be carried out in position-sensitive mode at three different areas: near the bottom, in the center, and at the top of the mortar. For investigation of SLCs from the very early hydration stage up to 10 h of hydration, a custom-made in situ sample holder for the measurements was designed and constructed. The combination of the GADDS and the custom-made in situ sample holder provides the possibility to characterize additionally the time-dependent phase composition within the SLC. The nonabsorbent substrate has no effect on the hydration of the binder phases but the absorbent substrate influences the formation of ettringite. In the top layer of the SLC the ettringite content is reduced during the first hours of hydration. The absorbing forces of the substrate lead to migration of the mix water to the substrate. This lack of water results in the reduced formation of ettringite.

Keywords

in situ XRDtwo-dimensional XRDGADDSposition-sensitive resolutioncement hydrationettringiteself-leveling compound
Type
X-Ray Diffraction
Information
Powder Diffraction , Volume 24 , Special Issue 2 , June 2009 , pp. 107 - 111
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderberg, A. (2007). Studies of Moisture and Alkalinity in Self-Levelling Flooring Compounds (Lunds Universitet, Lund).Google Scholar
De Gasparo, A. (2006). “Fractionation behavior of organic additives and resulting microstructural evolution of mixed-binder based flooring compounds,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Bern.Google Scholar
Harbron, R. (2001). “A general description of flow-applied floor screeds—an important application for complex formulations based on CAC,” Proceedings of the International Conference on Calcium Aluminate Cements 2001, Edinburgh, United Kingdom, pp. 597–604.Google Scholar
He, B. B., Preckwinkel, U., and Smith, K. L. (2000). “Fundamentals of two-dimensional x-ray diffraction (XRD2),” Adv. X-Ray Anal.AXRAAA 43, 273–280.Google Scholar
He, B. B. and Preckwinkel, U. (2002). “X-ray optics for two-dimensional diffraction,” Adv. X-Ray Anal.AXRAAA 45, 332–337.Google Scholar
Herwegh, M., Zurbriggen, R., Scrivener, K., De Gasparo, A., Kighelman, J., and Jenni, A. (2006). “A comparison between tile adhesive mortars (CTA) and self-leveling compounds (SLC): What can we learn about the role of polymers in thin-bed mortars?,” Proceedings of the 16th IBAUSIL, Weimar, paper 2-1059-2-1066.Google Scholar
Jenni, A., Holzer, R., Zurbriggen, R., and Herwegh, M. (2005). “Influence of polymers on microstructure and adhesive strength of cementitious tile adhesive mortars,” Cem. Concr. Res.CCNRAI 35, 35–50.10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.06.039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Motzet, H. (2007). “The performance of gypsum based self levelling compounds,” Proceedings of the First International Drymix Conference idmmc one, Nuremberg, Germany, pp. 26–32.Google Scholar
Neubauer, J., Goetz-Neunhoeffer, F., Holland, U., and Schmitt, D. (2004). “In situ XRD investigation of OPC hydration,” Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Cement Microscopy, San Antonio, TX, USA.Google Scholar
Winter, C. and Plank, J. (2007). “Die europäische Trockenmörtelindustrie (Teil 1): The European dry-mix mortar industry (Part 1),” ZKG Int.ZKGIFW 6, 62–69.Google Scholar