Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T12:31:51.002Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tilting of semi-rigid GaF6 octahedra in GaF3 at high pressures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 January 2017

Jens-Erik Jørgensen ,
Yaroslav Filinchuk  and
Vladimir Dmitriev
Jens-Erik Jørgensen*
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark
Yaroslav Filinchuk
Affiliation:
Institute of Condensed Matter and Nanosciences, Universiteé Catholique de Louvain, Place L. Pasteur 1, B-1348, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
Vladimir Dmitriev
Affiliation:
Swiss-Norwegian Beam Lines, European Synchrotron Radiation Facilities, BP 220, F-38043 Grenoble Cedex, France
*
a)Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Electronic mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The VF3-type compound GaF3 has been studied by high-pressure angle-dispersive X-ray diffraction in the pressure range from 0.0001 to 10 GPa. The compression mechanism was found to be highly anisotropic. The c-axis shows little pressure dependence (≈0.4%), but exhibits negative linear compressibility up to ≈3 GPa where it achieves its maximum length. In contrast, the length of the a-axis is reduced by ≈8.8% at the highest measured pressure and an anomalous reduction in the linear compressibility is observed at 4 GPa. The zero pressure bulk modulus B0 was determined to B0 = 28(1) GPa. The compression mechanism of GaF3 is discussed in terms of deformation of an 8/3/c2 sphere-packing model. The volume reduction of GaF3 is mainly achieved through coupled rotations of the GaF6 octahedra within the entire measured pressure range, which reduces the volume of the cubooctahedral voids. In addition, the volume of the GaF6 octahedra also decreases for p ≲ 4.0 GPa, but remains constant above this pressure. The volume reduction of the GaF6 octahedra is accompanied by an increasing octahedral strain. Isosurfaces of the procrystal electron density are used for visualization of the cubooctahedral voids at different pressures.

Keywords

high-pressurecompression mechanismvoid space
Type
Technical Articles
Information
Powder Diffraction , Volume 32 , Supplement S1 , September 2017 , pp. S69 - S73
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Fischer, W. (1973). “Existenzbedingungen homogener Kugelpackungen zu kubischen Gitterkomplexen mit weniger als drei Freiheitsgraden,” Z. Kristallogr. 138, 129–146.Google Scholar
Forman, R. A., Piermarini, G. J., Barnett, J. D., and Block, S. (1972). “Pressure measurement made by the utilization of ruby sharp-line luminescence,” Science 176, 284–285.Google Scholar
Herbstein, F. H., Kapon, M., and Reisner, G. M. (1985). “Crystal structures of chromium(III) fluoride trihydrate and chromium(III) fluoride pentahydrate. Structural chemistry of hydrated transition metal fluorides. Thermal decomposition of chromium(III) fluoride nonahydrate,” Z. Kristallogr. 171, 209–224.Google Scholar
Jørgensen, J.-E. and Smith, R. I. (2006). “On the compression mechanism of FeF3 ,” Acta Crystallogr. B 62, 987–992.Google Scholar
Jørgensen, J.-E., Marshall, W. G., and Smith, R. I. (2004). “The compression mechanism of CrF3 ,” Acta Crystallogr. B 60, 669–673.Google Scholar
Leblanc, M., Pannetier, J., Ferey, G., and de Pape, R. (1985). “Single-crystal refinement of the structure of rhombohedral FeF3 ,” Rev. Chim. Miner. 22, 107–114.Google Scholar
Mao, H. K., Xu, J., and Bell, P. M. (1986). “Calibration of the ruby pressure gauge to 800-kbar under quasi-hydrostatic conditions,” J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth Planets 91, 4673–4676.Google Scholar
Meisel, K. (1932). “Rheniumtrioxyd III. Mitteilung: Über die Kristallstruktur des Rheniumtrioxyds,” Z. Anorg. Allgem. Chem. 207, 121–128.Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Carvajal, J. (1993). “Recent advances in magnetic structure determination by neutron powder diffraction,” Physica B 192, 55–69.Google Scholar
Roos, M. and Meyer, G. (2001). “Refinement of the crystal structure of gallium trifluoride, GaF3 ,” Z. Kristallogr. New Cryst. Struct. 216, 18.Google Scholar
Sowa, H. and Ahsbahs, H. (1998). “Pressure-induced octahedron strain in VF3-type compounds,” Acta Crystallogr. B 54, 578–584.Google Scholar
Turner, M. J., McKinnon, J. J., Dylan Jayatilaka, D., and Spackman, M. A. (2011). “Visualisation and characterisation of voids in crystalline materials,” CrystEngComm 13, 1804–1813.Google Scholar
Wolff, S. K., Grimwood, D. J., McKinnon, J. J., Jayatilaka, D., and Spackman, M. A. (2012). CrystalExplorer (Version 3.1) (University of Western Australia).Google Scholar