Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T12:07:43.078Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Semiquantitative Analysis by X-Ray Powder Diffraction (SQXRD) of the < 2 mm to 0.002 mm and < 0.002 mm Fractions of Soil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2016

G. A. Raab
G. A. Raab*
Affiliation:
Lockheed Engineering and Management Services Company, Inc., 1050 E. Flamingo Road, Las Vegas, Nevada, 89119, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The method described in this paper is a strict protocol for X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis of mineral phases found in soils. Its application is not restricted to soils and is an attempt to standardize XRD sample preparation and analysis. The protocol requires the particle size of the < 2 mm - 0.002 mm fraction be reduced to 0.002 mm before analysis. In die qualitative section, the clay fraction ( < 0.002 mm particle size) is prepared as oriented slides. The suspended clay fraction is saturated with ethylene glycol, K +, and Mg+2; pipeted; air-dried; heat-treated at 110°C, 350°C, and 550°C; and X-rayed at each step in order to properly identify the clay minerals. In the quantitative section, the method employs a matrix-flushing agent, corundum (Al2O3). The corundum acts also as an internal standard, a calibration standard, and a reference standard. The suspended clay fraction is freeze-dried and corundum is added to each sample. Randomly oriented powder mounts are prepared from the < 2 mm - 0.002 mm fraction, and the < 0.002 mm fraction, and X-rayed. A series of reference standards are prepared based on the existing mineralogy, corundum is added, and each mixture is X-rayed. The software integrates the area under specific peaks (chosen for intensity and no overlap) in each sample, calculates the reference intensity ratios (RIRs) and calculates the percentage of each mineral based on the equation of Chung (1974). The attention to detail allows documentation and verification of the results yielding data of known quality.

Type
Research Article
Information
Powder Diffraction , Volume 3 , Issue 3 , September 1988 , pp. 144 - 152
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brown, G. & Brindley, G. (1980). X-ray Diffraction Procedures for Mineral Identification. In: Brindley, G. W. and Brown, G. (1980). Crystal Structures of Clay Minerals and Their X-Ray Identification. Monograph No. 5. London : Mineralogical Society.Google Scholar
Cappo, K. A., Blume, L. J., Raab, G. A., Bartz, J. K. & Engels, J. L. (1987). Analytical Methods Manual for the Direct/Delayed Response Project Soil Survey. EPA/600/8-87/020. Washington, D. C.: U. S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
Carroll, D. (1970). Clay Minerals: A Guide to Their Identification. Special Paper 126. Boulder, CO: Geological Society of AmericaGoogle Scholar
Chung, F. H. (1974). Quantitative Interpretation of X-Ra y Diffraction Patterns of Mixtures. I. Matrix-Flushing Method for Quantitative Multicomponent Analysis. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 7, 519–25.Google Scholar
Davis, B. L. (1986). A Tubular Aerosol Suspension Chamber for the Preparation of Powder Samples for X-Ray Diffraction Analysis. Pow. Diff. 1(3), 240–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, M. (1985). Personal communique. Terra Tek Core Services, Salt Lake, Utah.Google Scholar
Hutchison, C. S. (1974). Laboratory Handbook of Petrographic Techniques. New York: J. Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Jackson, M. L. (1969). Soil Chemical Analysis - Advanced Course, 2nd Ed. Published by aumor, Department of Soil Science, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Jenkins, R., Fawcett, T. G., Smith, D. K., Visser, J. W.Morris, M. C. & Frevel, L. K. (1986). Sample Preparation Methods in X-Ray Powder Diffraction. Pow. Diff. 1(2), 51–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klug, H. P. & Alexander, L. E. (1974). X-Ray Diffraction Procedures for Polycrystalline and Amorphous Materials. New York: J. Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Müller, G. (1967). Methods in Sedimentary Petrology. New York: E. Schweizerbartsche Verlagsbuchhandlung/Hafner.Google Scholar
Morris, M. C., McMurdie, H. F., Evans, E. H., Paretzkin, B., Parker, H. S., Wong-Ng, W., Gladhill, D. M. & Hubbard, C. R. (1985). Standard X-Ray Diffraction Powder Patterns. Natl. Bur. Stand. (U. S.)Monogr. 25(21), 3.Google Scholar
Powder Diffraction File (1985/1986). Swarthmore, PA: International Centre for Diffraction Data.Google Scholar
Smith, S. T., Snyder, R. L. & Brownell, W. E. (1979). Minimization of Preferred Orientation in Powders by Spray Drying. In Adv. X-Ray Anal. 22, 77–87. New York: PlenumGoogle Scholar
Starkey, H. C., Blackmon, P. D. & Hauff, P. L. (1984). The Routine Mineralogical Analysis of Clay-Bearing Samples. Washington, D. C.: U. S. Geological Bulletin 1563.Google Scholar
USDA/SCS (1984). Soil Survey Laboratory Methods and Procedures for Collecting Soil Samples. Soil Survey Investigations Report No. 1. Washington, D. C.: U. S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Weaver, C. E. (1973). The Chemistry of Clay Minerals. Developments in Sedimentology 15. New York: Elsevier Scientific.Google Scholar