Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T18:03:51.335Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of the partial substitution of sulfur on the structural and microstructural properties of selenium

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2012

Z. K. Heiba ,
M. B. El-Den  and
Karimat El-Sayed
Z. K. Heiba*
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
M. B. El-Den
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
Karimat El-Sayed
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
*
a)Electronic mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Samples of amorphous Se, SSe40, SSe30, and SSe20 were synthesized and were then crystallized by annealing at 373 K for 5, 20, and 120 mins. The results showed that the changes in the structural and microstructural parameters for samples SSe40, and SSe30 are different from those of sample SSe20. These discrepancies are being discussed in terms of the peak shifts in both the amorphous and crystalline state, the percentage of sulfur compositional variations, and finally in terms of the probable site occupancy of the sulfur atoms in the selenium structure.

Keywords

selenium–sulfur chalcogenide glassescrystallizationmicrostructureX-ray diffraction
Type
Technical Articles
Information
Powder Diffraction , Volume 17 , Issue 3 , September 2002 , pp. 186 - 190
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aleksandrovich, I. A. (1966). “X-ray structure of vitreous and crystalline states of the Se–S binary systems at different component concentrations,” Bulletin Uch. Zap. Leningrad Gos. Pedagog. Inst. (USSR) ZZZZZZ 202, 231–238.Google Scholar
Cervinka, L., Smotlacha, O., and Tichy, L. (1987). “A study of the structure of (GeS2)1−x(Sb2S3)x glasses,” J. Nucl. Energy JNCEAA 98, 183–186. jne, JNCEAA Google Scholar
Delhez, R., De Keijser, Th. H., Mittemeijer, E. J., and Langford, J. I. (1988). “Size and strain parameters from peak profiles: Sense and nonsense,” Aust. J. Phys. AUJPAS 41, 213–227. auj, AUJPAS CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delhez, R., De Keijser, Th. H., Langford, J. I, Louer, D., Mittemeijer, E. J., and Sonneled, E. J. (1993). The Rietveld Method, edited by Young, R. A. (Oxford University Press, Oxford), pp. 132–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drahoko, J., Klokocnikova, H., and Semunek, A. (1981). Inner and X-ray Physics of Atoms and Solids, edited by Fabian, D. J., Kaleinpoppen, H., and Watson, L. M. (Plenum, New York), p. 1749.Google Scholar
El-Mously, M. K., and Berisova, Z. U. (1967). “Crystallization of vitreeous SSe20 and Se,” Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Neorg. Mater. IVNMAW 3, 923–931. iam, IVNMAW Google Scholar
El-Mously, M. K., Kotkata, M. F., and Salam, S. A. (1978). “Growth of crystalline phase in amorphous solid and liquid SSe20,” J. Phys. C JPSOAW 11, 1077–1083. jpc, JPSOAW CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heiba, Z. K. (1991). “A deconvolution procedure for X-ray line profile analysis,” Egypt. J. Sol. ZZZZZZ 14, 150–154.Google Scholar
Jecu, D., Jaklovszky, J., Trutia, A., Apostol, H., Dinescu, M., Mihailescu, I., Aldica, G., Popescu, M., Vlahovici, N., Zamfira, S., and Indrea, E. (1986). “Preparation, structural and optical properties of glasses in the system Se–S and Te–S,” J. Non-Cryst. Solids JNCSBJ 90, 1–3. jnc, JNCSBJ Google Scholar
Mohamed Ali Ahmed Abou Zeid. (1990). “The structure of chalcogenide glasses in the Ge–Sb–S system,” Ph.D. thesis, Assiut University, Egypt.Google Scholar
Mott, N. M. and Davis, E. A. (1971). Electronic Processes in Non-Crystalline Materials (Clarendon, Oxford).Google Scholar
Myers, M. B.and Felty, E. J. (1967). “Structural characterization of vitreous inorganic polymers by thermal studies,” Mater. Res. Bull. MRBUAC 2, 535–546. mrb, MRBUAC CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paribok-Aleksondrovich, I. A.and Rostumova, T. I. (1968). “Effect of S additives and heat treatment of a melt on crystallization processes in Se,” (USSR) Bull. Uch. Fiz. Zap. Vologod. Gos. Pedadog. Inst. ZZZZZZ 36, 174–181.Google Scholar
Rodringuez-Carvajal, J. (1997). FULLPROF, Reference Guide, Laboratoire Leon Brillouin CEA-CNRS, France, Vol. 3.5.Google Scholar
Schottmiller, J., Tabak, M., Lucovsky, G., and Ward, A. (1970). “The effects of valency on transport properties in vitreous binary alloys of selenium,” J. Non-Cryst. Solids JNCSBJ 4, 80–96. jnc, JNCSBJ CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, P., Cox, D. E., and Hastings, J. B. (1987). “Rietveld refinement of Debye–Scherrer synchrotron data from Al2O3,” J. Appl. Crystallogr. JACGAR 20, 79–83. acr, JACGAR CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wahab, L. A., El-Den, M. B., and Youssof, M. S. (2000). “Thermal stability study of S–Se amorphous compounds,” Egypt. J. Solid ZZZZZZ 23, 71–79.Google Scholar
Wright, A. C. (1993). “Neutron and X-ray amorphography,” Experimental Techniques of Glass Science (American Ceramic Society, Westerville), Chap. 8, pp. 205–314.Google Scholar
Wyckoff, R. W. G. (1983). Crystal Structures, 2nd ed. (Wiley, New York), Vol. 1, p. 36.Google Scholar