Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T08:27:25.747Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Popular music analysis and musicology: bridging the gap

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2008

Richard Middleton
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Since their beginnings, popular music studies have conducted an implicit (sometimes explicit) dialogue with musicology. To be sure, the musicological side of this conversation has more often than not been marked by insult, incomprehension or silence; and popular music scholars for their part have tended to concentrate on musicology's deficiencies. But musicology is changing (more about this later); at the same time, recent work on popular music suggests a new confidence, manifesting itself in part in a willingness to engage with and adapt mainstream methods. I believe each needs the other.

Type
Articles
Information
Popular Music , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , May 1993 , pp. 177 - 190
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agawu, K. 1991. Playing with Signs (Princeton)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Assaf'ev, B. V. 1977. Musical Form as a Process, trans. Tull, J. R. (Ann Arbor)Google Scholar
Brackett, D. 1992. ‘James Brown's “Superbad” and the double-voiced utterance’, Popular Music, 11/3, pp. 309–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coker, W. 1972. Music and Meaning (New York)Google Scholar
Cook, N. 1990. Music, Imagination and Culture (Oxford)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, R. 1992. ‘A musico-rhetorical outline of Holst's “Egdon Heath”’, Music and Letters, 73:2 (05), pp. 244–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, S. 1992. ‘Towards new analytical methodologies in popular music’, Popular Music, 11/3, pp. 325–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, S. 1991. BBC Reith Lectures, Independent, 14 11, 21 11, 28 11, 5 12, 12 12, 19 12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerman, J. 1985. Musicology (London)Google Scholar
Kubik, G. et al. 1989. ‘African Arts’, in Encyclopedia Britannica, vol. 1, pp. 134–80Google Scholar
Kurth, E. 1991. Selected Writings, ed. and trans. Rothfarb, L. A. (Cambridge)Google Scholar
Maróthy, J. 1974. Music and the Bourgeois, Music and the Proletarian (Budapest)Google Scholar
Maróthy, J. and Batári, M. n.d. An Essay on the Musical Infinite, typescript translation by the authors of Apeiron Musikon: A Zenei Végtelen (Budapest 1986)Google Scholar
Middleton, R. 1990. Studying Popular Music (Milton Keynes)Google Scholar
Moore, A. 1993. Rock: The Primary Text (Milton Keynes)Google Scholar
Mukarovsky, J. 1977. Structure, Sign and Function (Cambridge, Massachusetts)Google Scholar
Subotnik, R. R. 1988. ‘Toward a deconstruction of structural listening: a critique of Schoenberg, Adorno and Stravinsky’, in Explorations in Music, The Arts and Ideas. Essays in Honor of Leonard B. Meyer, ed. Narmour, E. and Solie, R. A. (Stuyvesant, Philadelphia)Google Scholar
Van der Merwe, P. 1989. Origins of the Popular Style (Oxford)Google Scholar
Walser, R. 1992. ‘Eruptions: heavy metal appropriations of classical virtuosity’, Popular Music, 11/3, pp. 263–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar