Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-26wn4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-14T12:08:16.482Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The ‘one-man band’ and entrepreneurial selfhood in neoliberal culture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 September 2013

Dale Chapman
Dale Chapman*
Affiliation:
Department of Music, Bates College, 75 Russell Street, Lewiston ME 04240, USA E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article proposes that the recent history of the live solo multi-instrumentalist, more conventionally known as the ‘one-man band’, might serve as a useful window onto broader transformations in postmodern culture. If the one-person band has historically been understood as a humorous, culturally devalued phenomenon, with its practitioners occupying marginal race and class positions, the recent visibility of solo multi-instrumentalism in indie and experimental rock attests to its altered status in contemporary culture. The present discussion situates the shifting fortunes of the one-person band in relation to the contemporary hegemony of neoliberal conceptions of subjectivity. In their performance of nimble, flexible and omni-competent self-reliance, artists such as Theresa Andersson, Robert Fripp and Andrew Bird model some of the key qualities idealised by theorists of a free-market ‘entrepreneurial selfhood’.

Type
Articles
Information
Popular Music , Volume 32 , Issue 3 , October 2013 , pp. 451 - 470
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abel, R. 2006. Americanizing the Movies and ‘Movie-Mad’ Audiences, 1910–1914 (Berkeley, University of California Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ake, D. 2010. Jazz Matters: Sound, Place, and Time Since Bebop (Berkeley, University of California Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amin, A. (ed.) 1994. Post-Fordism: A Reader (Oxford, Blackwell)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersson, T. 2008a. ‘Na na na’, YouTube.com. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n2eD4GcLohE (accessed 8 August 2010)Google Scholar
Andersson, T. 2008b. ‘Birds Fly Away’, YouTube.com. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vMXqn42AykM (accessed 5 January 2011)Google Scholar
Auslander, P. 2008. Liveness: Performance in a Mediatized Culture, 2nd edn (New York, Routledge)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bastin, B. 1984. ‘From the medicine show to the stage: some influences upon the development of a blues tradition in the southeastern United States’, American Music, 2/1, pp. 29–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauman, Z. 2002. Society Under Siege (Oxford, Blackwell)Google Scholar
Bentley, J. 2009. ‘Theresa Andersson’, Morning Becomes Eclectic, 11 May. http://www.kcrw.com/music/programs/mb/mb090511theresa_andersson (accessed 1 May 2011)Google Scholar
Bird, A. 2009. ‘Anonanimal’, Pitchfork.com. http://pitchfork.com/tv/cemetery-gates/138-andrew-bird/1592-anonanimal/ (accessed 2 August 2013)Google Scholar
Brooks, T. 2004. Lost Sounds: Blacks and the Birth of the Recording Industry, 1890–1919 (Urbana, University of Illinois Press)Google Scholar
Bruno, A. 2007. ‘The YouTube conundrum’, Billboard, 3 March, pp. 32–3Google Scholar
Carmeli, Y. 2003. ‘Lion on display: culture, nature, and totality in a circus performance’, Poetics Today, 24/1, pp. 65–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cleveland, B. 2006. ‘Higher education: looping’, Guitar Player, 40/4, pp. 88–94Google Scholar
DeNora, T. 1991. ‘Musical patronage and social change in Beethoven's Vienna’, American Journal of Sociology, 97/2, pp. 310–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dean, J. 2009. Democracy and Other Neoliberal Fantasies: Communicative Capitalism and Left Politics (Durham, Duke University Press)Google Scholar
Duke, D. 2009. ‘Andersson and her invisible band return’, Virginian-Pilot, 5 March, p. E7Google Scholar
Ellis, A. 2000. ‘Flippertronics: Phish's TreyAnastasio trips out on guitar loops’, Guitar Player, 34/8, pp. 90–102Google Scholar
Everdell, A. 2009. ‘Frozen frame: what Warner Music Group and YouTube's messy breakup means for the future of online video’, Spin, 25 (April), p. 31Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, J. 1995. ‘Motown crossover hits 1963–1966 and the creative process’, Popular Music, 14/1, pp. 1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, M. 2008. The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France 1978–79, ed. Senellart, M. et al. , trans. Burchell, G. (Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan)Google Scholar
Fripp, R. 2007. ‘Friday, 2nd February 2007’, Robert Fripp's Diary, 2 February. http://www.robertfripp.com/diaries.htm?entry=5979 (accessed 9 June 2011)Google Scholar
García-Mainar, L. 2009. ‘Contemporary Hollywood crime film and the new individualism’, European Journal of American Studies, 2. http://ejas.revues.org/7650 (accessed 24 February 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gershuny, D. 2009. ‘Come on in my kitchen: Theresa Andersson’, Electronic Musician, 1 February. http://www.emusician.com/features-interviews/0777/profile-come-on-in-my-kitchen--theresa-anderson/134721 (accessed 1 August 2013)Google Scholar
Grossman, R. 2008. ‘The tip of the iceberg: laptop music and the information-technological transformation of music’, Organized Sound, 13/1, pp. 5–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, A. 1988. ‘Sample and hold: pop music in the digital age of reproduction’, Critical Quarterly, 30/3, pp. 34–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, S. 1988. ‘Brave new world’, Marxism Today, (October), pp. 24–9Google Scholar
Harms, B. 2007. ‘Early percussion’, in A Performer's Guide to Renaissance Music, 2nd edn, ed. Kite-Powell, J.T. (Bloomington, Indiana University Press), pp. 194–205Google Scholar
Harvey, D. 2007. A Brief History of Neoliberalism (New York, Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Himes, G. 2008. ‘Talented, down to her toes: vocal, instrumental, even foot pedal mastery evident in one-woman show’, Washington Post, 26 September, p. WE07Google Scholar
Holland, W.E. 2000. Change Is The Rule: Practical Actions for Change: On Target, On Time, On Budget (Chicago, Dearborn)Google Scholar
Kelley, R. 1997. Yo Mama's Dysfunctional: Fighting the Culture Wars in Urban America (Boston, Beacon Press)Google Scholar
Kramer, L. 1990. Music As Cultural Practice 1800–1900 (Berkeley, University of California Press)Google Scholar
Kramer, L. 2002. Musical Meaning: Toward a Critical History (Berkeley, University of California Press)Google Scholar
Krims, A. 2007. Music and Urban Geography (New York, Routledge)Google Scholar
Levine, L. 1988. Highbrow/Lowbrow: The Emergence of Cultural Hierarchy in America (Cambridge, Harvard University Press)Google Scholar
Lindgren, H. 2009. ‘Influences: Andrew Bird’, New York Magazine, 2 February. http://nymag.com/arts/popmusic/features/53586/ (accessed 13 May 2011)Google Scholar
Little, K. 2006. ‘The circus in ruins: a comment on “Lion on display: culture, nature, and totality in a circus performance”’, Poetics Today, 27/3, pp. 597–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macan, E. 1997. Rocking the Classics: English Progressive Rock and the Counterculture (New York, Oxford University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcus, G. 1993. In the Fascist Bathroom: Punk in Pop Music, 1977–92 (Cambridge, Harvard University Press)Google Scholar
Martin, C. 1993. ‘Traditional criticism of popular music and the making of a lip-synching scandal’, Popular Music and Society, 17/4, pp. 63–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayhew, H. 1864. London Labour and the London Poor, Vol. 3 (London, Charles Griffin and Company)Google Scholar
McClary, S. 2002. Feminine Endings: Music, Gender, and Sexuality (Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press)Google Scholar
McRobbie, A. 1999. In The Culture Society: Art, Fashion and Popular Music (London, Routledge)Google Scholar
Negus, K. 1999. Music Genres and Corporate Cultures (London, Routledge)Google Scholar
Oliver, P. 1984. Songsters and Saints: Vocal Traditions on Race Records, Vol. 2 (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Oliver, P. 2003. ‘One-man band’, in Continuum Encyclopedia of Popular Music Of The World, Vol. 2, ed. Shepherd, J. (London, Continuum), pp. 48–9Google Scholar
Picker, J. 1999. ‘The soundproof study: Victorian professionals, work space, and urban noise’, Victorian Studies, 42/3, pp. 427–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powers, A. 2001. Weird Like Us: My Bohemian America (New York, Da Capo Press)Google Scholar
Richardson, J. 2009. ‘Televised live performance, looping technology and the “Nu Folk”: KT Tunstall on Later … with Jools Holland’, in The Ashgate Research Companion to Popular Musicology, ed. Scott, D. (Surrey, Ashgate), pp. 85–101Google Scholar
Rowland-Jones, A. 1995. ‘The recorder's medieval and renaissance repertory: a commentary’, in The Cambridge Companion to the Recorder, ed. Thompson, J.M. (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press), pp. 26–50Google Scholar
Scherzinger, M. 2005. ‘Music, Corporate Power, and Unending War’, Cultural Critique, 60, pp. 23–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, S. 1999. Dancing in the Street: Motown and the Cultural Politics of Detroit (Cambridge, Harvard University Press)Google Scholar
Tanenbaum, S. 1995. Underground Harmonies: Music and Politics in the Subways of New York (Ithaca, Cornell University Press)Google Scholar
Théberge, P. 1997. Any Sound You Can Imagine: Making Music /Consuming Technology (Hanover, University Press of New England and Wesleyan University Press)Google Scholar
Thompson, A. 2002. ‘Hallowed ground: 50 of the greatest stomp boxes of all time’, Guitar Player, 36/9, pp. 66–76Google Scholar
Van Ronk, D., and Wald, E. 2006. The Mayor of MacDougal Street: A Memoir (New York, Da Capo Press)Google Scholar
Vincent, J. 2010. ‘Left Behind in America: the Army of One at the end of history’, in Reframing 9/11: Film, Popular Culture, and the ‘War on Terror’, ed. Birkenstein, J., Froula, A. and Randell, K. (New York and London, Continuum)Google Scholar
Virno, P. 1996. ‘Virtuosity and revolution: the political theory of Exodus’, in Radical Thought in Italy: A Potential Politics, ed. Virno, P. and Hardt, M. (Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press)Google Scholar
Weiss, N. 1999. ‘Stranger in the night: nobody knows what madness will unfold at Jon Brion's weekly gigs – including Jon Brion’, Los Angeles, (January), p. 22Google Scholar
Wilson, C. 2008. ‘The trouble with indie rock: it's not just race. It's class’, in Best Music Writing 2008, ed. George, N. and Carr, D. (New York, Da Capo Press), pp. 1–6Google Scholar
Wirt, J. 2005. ‘Johnson's drumming memories are music history’, Baton Rouge Advocate, 14 January, p. FUN-12Google Scholar
Wirt, J. 2010. ‘Andersson's music evolved into a one-woman show’, Baton Rouge Advocate, 23 April, p. 23Google Scholar
Wray, J. 2008. ‘The return (sort of) of the one-man band’, New York Times Magazine, 18 May, pp. 34–9Google Scholar
Wolff, J. 1989. ‘Forward: the ideology of autonomous art’, in Music and Society: The Politics of Composition, Performance, and Reception, ed. Leppert, R. and McClary, S. (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Wood, J. 1999. Wooden Images: Misericords and Medieval England (Cranbury, Associated University Presses)Google Scholar
Zucchi, J. 1992. The Little Slaves of the Harp: Italian Child Street Musicians in Nineteenth Century Paris, London and New York (Montreal, McGill-Queen's University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar