Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T17:19:57.470Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Is your love in vain? – dialectical dilemmas in Bob Dylan's recent love songs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2008

Extract

In a recent interview, Bob Dylan said that he has learned never to ‘give one hundred per cent’ – a person, particularly a public artist, should always hold something in reserve. Somewhat taken aback, the interviewer pressed for a follow-up to this puzzling statement. Wasn't Dylan giving 100 per cent on those great albums of the 1960s. Highway 61 Revisited and Blonde on blonde? All right, Dylan finally admitted, maybe he was. The reporter dropped the question and went on to other subjects, leaving the readers, like Mr Jones, wondering just what is going on here. Most people who have followed Dylan's work throughout his career would agree that, in his work of the 1980s, he seems to be holding something back. There are flashes of brilliance, of the old verbal acuity, the ability to come up with the startlingly perfect phrase to fit his needs in a song. There have been truly great songs, like ‘Jokerman’, ‘Dark Eyes’ and ‘Brownsville Girl’. But there have also been embarrassingly awful songs, like ‘Never Gonna Be the Same Again’, lacklustre singing and woefully inconsistent production values on his records. We know what he is capable of – he knows what he is capable of – yet he doesn't give us his best. Why? In our view the answer, like most aspects of Bob Dylan, is not simple but may well involve a complex combination of factors all pertaining to the attempt to balance the dialectical forces pulling upon him from both the public and private areas of his life.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Askham, J. 1976. ‘Identity and stability within the marriage relationship’, Journal of Marriage and the Family, 4, pp. 535–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooley, C. H. 1902. Human Nature and the Social Order (New York)Google Scholar
Erikson, E. 1970. Motivation and Personality (New York)Google Scholar
La Gaipa, J. J. 1981. A systems approach to social relationships', in Personal Relationships, Vol. 1, ed. Duck, S. and Gilmour, R.. (New York) pp. 6790Google Scholar
Levinson, D. J. 1978. The Seasons of a Man's Life (New York)Google Scholar
Lewis, R. A. 1981. Emotional intimacy among men', Journal of Social Issues, 34, pp. 108–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pogrebin, L. C. 1987. Among Friends (New York)Google Scholar
Rawlins, W. K. 1982. ‘Cross sex friendship and the communicative management of sex role expectations’, Communication Quarterly, 30(Fall), pp. 343–52Google Scholar
Rawlins, W. K. 1983. ‘Negotiating close friendship: the dialectic of conjunctive freedoms’, Human Communication Research, 9, pp. 255–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, L. B. 1983. Intimate Strangers: Men and Women Together (New York)Google Scholar
Seeman, M. 1959. ‘On the meaning of alienation’, American Sociological Review, 24, pp. 783–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. and Grajeh, S. 1984. ‘The nature of love’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, pp. 312–29Google Scholar