Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:27:42.057Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

From Catfish Row to Granby Street: contesting meaning in Porgy and Bess1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2008

Extract

For reasons which would themselves be worthy of an article, the musical theatre has been almost entirely ignored by popular music scholarship. This has often puzzled me, since such factors as the musical theatre's ambiguous position in the high/low culture debate, its close relationship with film (film musicals were for a time a favoured subject – with film theorists), its persistent playing with the links between song and drama, the sociality of its performance conventions, the durability of the amateur performance tradition, to name but a few, together suggest a promising vein of study. Musical theatre songs have been the subject of intermittent scholarly investigation, mostly from a perspective derived from classical musicology. Wilfrid Mellers, characteristically, sought meaning through musicology (he speaks of Cole Porter's chromatics as telling us ‘regretfully, that we are kidding ourselves’ (in love) and of the ‘queasy honesty’ of ‘Anything Goes’), but found too many musicals tend to ‘create an illusion that we can live on the surface of our emotions’ and never get beyond that point. (Mellers 1964, pp. 384, 385).

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, R. C. 1990. Horrible Prettiness: Burlesque and American Culture (Chapel Hill)Google Scholar
Billington, M. 1992. ‘Learning to live on Catfish Row’, The Guardian, 6 10, p.32Google Scholar
Cohen, S. 1993. ‘Localizing sound: music, place and social mobility’, paper given at the 7th International Conference on Popular Music Studies,Stockton, California,July 1993Google Scholar
Cruse, H. 1967. The Crisis of the Negro Intellectual (New York)Google Scholar
Gifford, Lord. 1989. Loosen the Shackles: First Report of the Liverpool 8 Inquiry into Race Relations in Liverpool (London)Google Scholar
Horn, D. 1994. ‘Who loves you Porgy?’, in The American Musical in Context, ed Lawson-Peebles, R. (Exeter), in pressGoogle Scholar
Jablonski, E. 1987. Gershwin (New York)Google Scholar
Meintjes, L. 1990. ‘Paul Simon's Graceland, South Africa, and the mediation of musical meaning’, Ethnomusicology, 34:1, pp. 3771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellers, W. 1964. Music in a New Found Land: Themes and Developments in the History of American Music (London)Google Scholar
Mellers, W. 1986. ‘Voices from Eden’, Times Literary Supplement, 25 07, p. 817Google Scholar
Middleton, R. 1990. Studying Popular Music (Buckingham)Google Scholar
Peechey, G. 1989. ‘On the borders of Bakhtin: dialogisation, decolonisation’, in Bakhtin and Cultural Theory, ed. Hirschkop, K. and Shepherd, D. (Manchester), pp. 3967Google Scholar
Rosenberg, D. 1992. Fascinating Rhythm: the Collaboration of George and Ira Gershwin (London)Google Scholar
Starr, L. 1984. ‘Toward a re-evaluation of Gershwin's “Porgy and Bess”’, American Music, 2:2, pp. 2537Google Scholar