Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T01:23:52.617Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The cost of music

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2020

Matt Brennan  and
Kyle Devine
Matt Brennan
Affiliation:
School of Culture and Creative Arts, University of Glasgow, United Kingdom E-mail: [email protected]
Kyle Devine
Affiliation:
Department of Musicology, Faculty of Humanities, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

What is the cost of music in the so-called Anthropocene? We approach this question by focusing on the case of sound-recording formats. We consider the cost of recorded music through two overlapping lenses: economic cost, on the one hand, and environmental cost, on the other. The article begins by discussing how the price of records has changed from the late 19th to the 21st century and across the seven most economically significant playback formats: phonograph cylinder, gramophone disc, vinyl LP, cassette tape, compact disc, digital audio files on hard drive, and streaming from the cloud. Our case study territory is the United States, and we chart the gradual decline in the price of recorded music up to the present. We then examine the environmental and human costs of music by looking at what recordings are made out of, where those materials come from, and what happens to them when they are disposed of. Despite what rhetorics of digital dematerialisation tell us, we show that the labour conditions in the digital electronics and IT industries are as inhumane as ever, while the amount of greenhouse gases released by the US recording industry could actually be higher today than at the height of any previous format. We conclude by asking the obvious (but by no means straightforward) question: what are musicians and fans to do?

Type
Articles
Information
Popular Music , Volume 39 , Issue 1 , February 2020 , pp. 43 - 65
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Acland, C. (ed.). 2007. Residual Media (Minneapolis, MN, University of Minnesota Press)Google Scholar
Alhadeff, P. 2006. ‘The value of music and the trappings of the marketplace, 1990–2005’, The MEIEA Journal, 6(1). http://www.meiea.org/Journal/html_ver/Vol06_No01/2006_Vol_6_No_1_A1.htmCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, A.S., Titon, J.T. and Von Glahn, D. 2014. “Sustainability and Sound: Ecomusicology Inside and Outside the University,” Music and Politics, 7(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.3998/mp.9460447.0008.205Google Scholar
Arditi, D. 2018. ‘Digital subscriptions: the unending consumption of music in the digital era’, Popular Music and Society, 41, pp. 302–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ballereau, V. et al. 2018. ‘Pour une géologie des instruments de musique’, in Les arts du spectacle au prisme du développement durable, ed. Urrutiaguer, D. (Paris, Presses de la Sorbonne Nouvelle)Google Scholar
Behr, A., Brennan, M., and Cloonan, M. 2016a. ‘Cultural value and cultural policy: some evidence from the world of live music’, International Journal of Cultural Policy, 22/3, pp. 403–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behr, A., Brennan, M., Cloonan, M., Frith, S., and Webster, E. 2016b. ‘Live concert performance: an ecological approach’, Rock Music Studies, 3/1, pp. 5–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bendor, R., Maggs, D., Peake, R., Robinson, J., and Williams, S. 2017. ‘The imaginary worlds of sustainability: observations from an interactive art installation’, Ecology and Society, 22/2, p. 17. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09240-220217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, J., Hashimzade, N., and Myles, G. 2009. A Dictionary of Economics (Oxford, Oxford University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blistein, J. 2019. ‘Is streaming music dangerous to the environment?’, Rolling Stone. https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-features/environmental-impact-streaming-music-835220/ (23 May)Google Scholar
Borgdorff, H.A. 2012. The Conflict of the Faculties: Perspectives on Artistic Research and Academia (Amsterdam, Leiden University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, A. 2011. Originary Technicity: the Theory of Technology from Marx to Derrida (New York, Palgrave Macmillan)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, M. 2020. ‘The infrastructure and environmental consequences of live music’, in Audible Infrastructures: Music, Sound, Media, ed. Devine, K. and Boudreault-Fournier, A. (Oxford, Oxford University Press), in pressGoogle Scholar
Brennan, M., and Archibald, P. 2019. The Economic Cost of Recorded Music: Findings, Datasets, Sources, and Methods. Dataset hosted at the University of Glasgow. http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/183249/Google Scholar
Brennan, M., and Devine, K. 2019. ‘Music streaming has a far worse carbon footprint than the heyday of records and CDs – new findings’, The Conversation, 8 April. https://theconversation.com/music-streaming-has-a-far-worse-carbon-footprint-than-the-heyday-of-records-and-cds-new-findings-114944Google Scholar
Brennan, M., Collinson-Scott, J., Connelly, A., and Lawrence, G. 2019. ‘Do music festival communities address environmental sustainability and how? A Scottish case study’, Popular Music, 38/2, 252–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronfman, A. 2020. ‘Glittery: unearthed histories of music, mica, and work’, in Audible Infrastructures: Music, Sound, Media, ed. Devine, K. and Boudreault-Fournier, A. (Oxford, Oxford University Press), in pressGoogle Scholar
Chakrabarty, D. 2012. ‘Postcolonial studies and the challenge of climate change’, New Literary History, 43, pp. 1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, O., and Sawchuk, K. 2012. ‘Research-creation: intervention, analysis and ‘family resemblances’, Canadian Journal of Communication 37/1, pp. 5–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devine, K. 2015. ‘Decomposed: a political ecology of music’, Popular Music, 34, pp. 367–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devine, K. 2019. Decomposed: The Political Ecology of Music (Cambridge, MA, MIT Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devine, K., and Boudreault-Fournier, A. (eds.) 2020. ‘Making infrastructures audible: an introduction’, in Audible Infrastructures: Music, Sound, Media, ed. Devine, K. and Boudreault-Fournier, A. (Oxford, Oxford University Press), in pressGoogle Scholar
Excell, C., and Moses, E. 2017. Thirsting for Justice: Transparency and Poor People's Struggle for Clean Water in Indonesia, Mongolia, and Thailand (Washington, DC, World Resources Institute)Google Scholar
Finnegan, R. 1989. The Hidden Musicians: Music-making in an English Town (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Frith, S. 1978. The Sociology of Rock (London, Constable)Google Scholar
Frith, S. 1996. Performing Rites: On the Value of Popular Music (Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press)Google Scholar
Galloway, A. 2016. ‘History is what hurts: on old materialism’, Social Text, 127, pp. 125–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelatt, R. 1977. The Fabulous Phonograph, 1877–1977 (New York, Collier Books)Google Scholar
Government of India. 1946. Labour Investigation Committee: Main Report (Delhi, Manager of Publications)Google Scholar
Gronow, P., Moseley, C., and Saunio, I. 1999. An International History of the Recording Industry (London, Bloomsbury Academic)Google Scholar
Grossberg, L. 2010. Cultural Studies in the Future Tense (Durham, NC, Duke University Press)Google Scholar
Haraway, D., Ishikawa, N., Scott, G., Olwig, K., Tsing, A., and Bubandt, N. 2015. ‘Anthropologists are talking – about the Anthropocene’, Ethnos, 81, pp. 535–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heise, U.K. 2016. ‘The environmental humanities and the futures of the human’, New German Critique, 128, pp. 21–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jevons, W.S. 1865. The Coal Question (London, Macmillan)Google Scholar
Kagen, S., and Kirchberg, V. 2016. ‘Music and sustainability: organizational cultures towards creative resilience – a review’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 135, pp. 1487–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keightley, K. 2001. ‘Reconsidering rock’, in The Cambridge Companion to Pop and Rock, ed. Frith, S., Straw, W. and Street, J. (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press), pp. 109–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klinger, B. 2007. Cylinder Records: Significance, Production, and Survival, Library of Congress www.loc.gov/programs/static/national-recording-preservation-board/documents/klinger.pdfGoogle Scholar
Koenigsberg, A. 1969. Edison Cylinder Records, 1889–1912 with an Illustrated History of the Phonograph (New York, Stellar Productions)Google Scholar
Krause, B. 2016. Wild Soundscapes: Discovering the Voice of the Natural World (New Haven, CT, Yale University Press)Google Scholar
Lepawsky, J. 2018. Reassembling Rubbish: Worlding Electronic Waste (Cambridge, MA, MIT Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, L. 2019. ‘Do people value recorded music?’, Cultural Sociology 13(2), pp. 141–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martland, P. 2013. Recording History: the British Record Industry, 1888–1931 (Lanham, Md: Scarecrow Press)Google Scholar
Merchant, B. 2017. The One Device: The Secret History of the iPhone (London, Bantam Press)Google Scholar
Middleton, R. 1990. Studying Popular Music (Philadelphia, PA, Open University Press)Google Scholar
Nixon, R. 2011. Slow Violence and the Environmentalism of the Poor (Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press)Google Scholar
O'Brien, D. (2010) ‘Measuring the value of culture: A report to the Department for Culture Media and Sport’. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/measuring-the-value-of-culture-a-report-to-the-department-for-culture-media-and-sport (accessed 3 April 2019)Google Scholar
Oliver, P.G. 2010. “The DIY artist: issues of sustainability within local music scenes,” Management Decision, 48/9, pp. 1422–1432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, W. 2011. ‘Wallet share’, PRS for Music Economic Insight. https://www.prsformusic.com/-/media/files/prs-for-music/research/economic-insight-22-wallet-share.ashx?la=en&hash=A6374CEEECC7D6D901253306F859FCEA34DE0F34 18 AprilGoogle Scholar
Pedelty, M. 2012. Ecomuiscology: Rock, Folk, and the Environment (Philadelphia, PA, Temple University Press)Google Scholar
Qiu, J.L. 2016. Goodby iSlave: a Manifesto for Digital Abolition (Urbana, IL, University of Illinois Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothenberg, D., and Ulvaeus, M. 2009. The Book of Music and Nature (Middletown, CT, Wesleyan University Press)Google Scholar
Roy, E. 2020. ‘Another side of shellac: cultural and natural cycles of the gramophone disc’, in Audible Infrastructures: Music, Sound, Media, ed. Devine, K. and Boudreault-Fournier, A. (Oxford, Oxford University Press), in pressGoogle Scholar
Savage, M. 2019. ‘Is this the end of owning music?’, BBC News, https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-46735093 3 JanuaryGoogle Scholar
Schippers, H., and Grant, C. (eds). 2016. Sustainable Futures for Music Cultures: An Ecological Perspective (New York, Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, Z.B. 2018. ‘The limits of Anthropocene narratives’, European Journal of Social Theory, https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1368431018799256 online pre-publication versionCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J. 2015. Eco-Sonic Media (Berkeley, CA, University of California Press)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Starosielski, N. 2015. The Undersea Network (Durham, NC, Duke University Press)Google Scholar
Sophie, Stévance, and Lacasse, Serge. 2017. Research-Creation in Music and the Arts: Towards a Collaborative Interdiscipline (London, Routledge)Google Scholar
Taylor, T. 2007. The commodification of music at the dawn of the era of ‘mechanical music’, Ethnomusicology, 51/2, 281–305Google Scholar
Taylor, T. 2017. ‘Valuing music’, in Music in the World: Selected Essays (Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press), pp. 174–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomlinson, G. 2015. A Million Years of Music: The Emergence of Human Modernity (New York, Zone Books)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Titon, J.T. 2009. “Music and Sustainability: An Ecological Viewpoint,” The World of Music, 51/1, pp. 119–137.Google Scholar
Vergès, F. 2017. ‘Radical Capitalocene’, in Futures of Black Radicalism, ed. Johnson, G.T. and Lubin, A. (London, Verso)Google Scholar
Wile, Raymond R. 2008. The Edison Discography 1926–29 (Denver, CO, Mainspring)Google Scholar
Williams, R. 1977. Marxism and Literature (Oxford, Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Wolcott, S.J. 2016. ‘The role of music in the transition towards a culture of sustainability’, Empowering Sustainability International Journal, 3, pp. 1–19Google Scholar
Yusoff, K. 2018. A Billion Black Anthropocenes or None (Minneapolis, MN, University of Minnesota Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zagorski-Thomas, S. and Henson, D. 2019. ‘Setting the agenda: the theory of popular music practice’, in The Bloomsbury Handbook of Popular Music Education, ed. Moir, Z., Powell, B. and Dylan-Smith, G. (New York, Bloomsbury Academic Press)Google Scholar
Bravo, Citizen, Build a Thing of Beauty. Chemikal Underground Records. 2019Google Scholar
Hess, T., and Hutton, N., Guts. Directed and produced by N. Hutton and T. Hess. 2019Google Scholar
‘How much should we pay artists for listening to their music?’ Directed by Graeme O'Hara. Bob's Trainset Productions. 2019Google Scholar
The Cost of Music. Directed by Graeme O'Hara. Bob's Trainset Productions. 2019Google Scholar
‘What is the environmental cost of recorded music?’ Directed by Graeme O'Hara. Bob's Trainset Productions. 2019Google Scholar
Bravo, Citizen, Build a Thing of Beauty. Chemikal Underground Records. 2019Google Scholar
Hess, T., and Hutton, N., Guts. Directed and produced by N. Hutton and T. Hess. 2019Google Scholar
‘How much should we pay artists for listening to their music?’ Directed by Graeme O'Hara. Bob's Trainset Productions. 2019Google Scholar
The Cost of Music. Directed by Graeme O'Hara. Bob's Trainset Productions. 2019Google Scholar
‘What is the environmental cost of recorded music?’ Directed by Graeme O'Hara. Bob's Trainset Productions. 2019Google Scholar