Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T06:25:38.646Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Beating up the classics: aspects of a compact discourse

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2008

Colin Symes
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Although much has been written about the changes wrought to art in the age of mechanical reproduction, these same changes as they have impacted on music through the phenomenon of the phonograph have not received equivalent attention or, if they have, then their discussion has been restricted to particular sectors of the music industry. This failure to address an important facet of contemporary music practice derives from a continuing tendency to abstract musical questions from their context and to obscure the material contributions that technology makes to such practice (Shepherd 1977, 1991; Scott 1990). With some musics this is more apparent than others. For instance, while there has been an extensive analysis of the degree to which the recording industry has influenced and been an integral element in the development of popular music, there has not been an equivalent analysis of its influence on classical music. This is because in the case of the former the links between the two have been somewhat more dramatic. The recording industry, particularly through its links with radio and television stations, has in large measure facilitated the spread of popular music across the world as a dominant element of a globalised culture, as one of its master codes.

Type
Articles
Information
Popular Music , Volume 16 , Issue 1 , January 1997 , pp. 81 - 95
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adorno, T. 1990. ‘Opera and the long playing record’, October, 55, pp. 62–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Attali, J. 1985. Noise: The Political Economy of Music (Manchester)Google Scholar
Berland, J. 1984. ‘Angels dancing: cultural technologies and the production of space’, Popular Music, 4, pp. 119–49Google Scholar
Blake, A. 1992. The Music Business (London)Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste (Cambridge, Mass.)Google Scholar
Buckley, J. et al. 1994. The Rough Guide to Classical Music on CD (London)Google Scholar
Cook, N. 1994. ‘Music and meaning in the commercials’, Popular Music, 13, pp. 27–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, D. 1976. ‘Marxism and popular culture’, in Approaches to Popular Culture, ed. Bigsby, C. S. W. (London)Google Scholar
Durant, A. 1990. ‘A new day for music? Digital technologies in contemporary music making’, in Culture Technology and Creativity in the Late Twentieth Century, ed. Hayward, P. (London)Google Scholar
Featherstone, M. 1993. Consumer Culture and Postmodernism (London)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frith, S. 1987. ‘Towards an aesthetic of popular music’, in Music and Society: The Politics of Composition, Performance and Reception, eds Leppert, R. and McClary, S. (Cambridge)Google Scholar
Frith, S. and Goodwin, A. 1990. On Record: Rock, Pop and the Written Word (London)Google Scholar
Gay, P. du and Negus, K. 1994. ‘The changing sites of sound: music retailing and the composition of consumers’, Media, Culture and Society, 61, pp. 87–114Google Scholar
Gould, G. 1987. ‘The prospect of recording’, in The Glenn Gould Reader, ed. Page, T. (London)Google Scholar
Greenfield, E., Layton, R. and March, I. 1994. The Penguin Guide to Compact Discs (Harmondsworth)Google Scholar
Griffith, A. G. 1994. ‘Sleight of hand’, Gramophone, 72Google Scholar
Grossberg, L. 1986. ‘Teaching the popular’, in Theory in the Classroom, ed. Nelson, C. (Urbana, Ill.)Google Scholar
Grossberg, L. 1993. ‘Cinema, postmodernity and authenticity’, in Sound and Vision: The Music Video Reader, eds Frith, S., Goodwin, A. and Grossberg, L. (London)Google Scholar
Hosokawa, S. 1984. ‘The Walkman effect’, Popular Music, 3, pp. 165–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ives, C. 1973. Memos (London)Google Scholar
Jameson, F. 1984. ‘Postmodernism, or the cultural logic of late capitalism’, New Left Review, 146Google Scholar
Jones, S.C. and Schumacher, T.G. 1992. ‘Muzak: on functional music and power’, Critical Studies and Mass Communication, 9 pp. 156–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, N. 1991. Always Playing (London)Google Scholar
Lanham, R.A. 1993. The Electronic Word (Chicago)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollard, C. 1994. ‘Passing notes through yellow tinted spectacles’, Gramophone, 71, pp. 18–20Google Scholar
Scott, D.B. 1990. ‘Music and sociology for the 1990s: a changing perspective’, The Musical Quarterly, 74, pp. 385–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepherd, J. 1977. ‘Media, social process and music’, in Whose Music? A Sociology of Musical Language, eds Shepherd, J. et al. (London)Google Scholar
Shepherd, J. 1991. Music as Social Text (Cambridge)Google Scholar
Symes, C. 1992. ‘Exhibiting at “The Ekka”: an essay in domestic aesthetics’, Arena, 98, pp. 76–87Google Scholar