Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T09:33:10.344Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Strategies for reconstructing the popular past

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2008

Extract

One of the things that distinguishes music from other forms of popular culture is that its consumption is accompanied by so much comment. Neither TV nor film, for instance, has accrued the volume, diversity or specialisation of the books and magazines devoted to music and read by people without a professional investment. This literature poses particular problems for historians of rock'n'roll, rock and pop. What are its main methods of ordering the popular past? Which musics and events does it privilege? How should scholars read the music press as sources? How can the pop histories contained in New Musical Express, Billboard or The Face be interpreted for histories of pop? This article is derived from work-in-progress concerning the history of discotheques and club cultures from the late 1950s until the present day. As such, it offers no tidy solutions or complete narratives, but rehearses a few dilemmas relevant to writing about popular culture.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bourdieu, P. 1984. Distinction: a Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste, trans. Nice, Richard (Cambridge, MA)Google Scholar
Clarke, D. (ed.) 1989. The Penguin Encyclopaedia of Popular Music (London)Google Scholar
Cohn, N. 1969. Rock From the Beginning (New York)Google Scholar
Cummings, T. 1975. ‘Gloria Gaynor and the disco boom’, Black Music, II (19, 06)Google Scholar
Donovan, K. 1981. The Place (Hanley, Staffordshire)Google Scholar
Elms, E. 1988. ‘NightclubbingThe Face, 100 (09)Google Scholar
Frith, S. and Horne, H. 1987. Art into Pop (London)Google Scholar
Frith, S. 1988. Music For Pleasure (London)Google Scholar
Ford, J. 1983. Musician, (04)Google Scholar
Ford, J. 1984. Musician, (12)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, J. 1979. ‘Will disco really stand up on this side of the Atlantic?’, Music Week: Disco Supplement, 5 05, p. 2Google Scholar
Gillett, C. 1983. The Sound of the City. Rev. edn. (London)Google Scholar
Hebdige, D. 1981. Subculture: the Meaning of Style (London)Google Scholar
Hebdige, D. 1988. ‘The bottom line on Planet One’, Hiding in the Light (London)Google Scholar
Hillmore, P. 1988. ‘Dancing as fast as they can’, Observer Magazine, 10 04Google Scholar
Holden, S. 1979. ‘The evolution of a dance craze’, Rolling Stone, 19 04Google Scholar
Joe, R. A. 1980. This Business of Disco (New York)Google Scholar
Marcus, G. 1977. Mystery Train (London)Google Scholar
Marcus, G. 1989. Lipstick Traces: a Secret History of the Twentieth Century (London)Google Scholar
McRobbie, A. 1980. ‘Settling accounts with subcultures: a feminist critique’, Screen Education, 34 (Spring)Google Scholar
Melly, G. 1970. Revolt into Style (London)Google Scholar
Musician's Union Executive Committee's Reports of Biennial Delegates Conferences,1959Google Scholar
Rolling Stone, 1977. ‘Disco's top thirty’, 19 04, pp. 20–3.Google Scholar
Welch, C. 1975. ‘Disco-trekkinMelody Maker, 30 08Google Scholar
White, H. 1980. ‘The value of narrativity in the representation of reality’, Critical Inquiry, Autumn, pp. 527Google Scholar
Wise, S. 1984. ‘Sexing Elvis’, Women's Studies International Forum, VII (1)Google Scholar