Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T09:15:33.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mother revolution: representations of the maternal body in the work of Tori Amos

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 April 2015

Sarah Boak
Sarah Boak*
Affiliation:
Department of Music, University of Southampton, Highfield Campus, Southampton, SO21 1BJ E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The pregnant or maternal body is conspicuously absent within popular music. The dominant representation of female bodies – sonically, visually and spatially conceived – is that of a sexualised body, available to men and existing under the male gaze. The figure of the pregnant, maternal or motherly body is marked as Other – not desirable and therefore not marketable. Looking at the work of Tori Amos, I demonstrate how she makes the maternal body both audible and visible through a number of musical and extra-musical strategies. Theorising the maternal body in a series of overlapping stages – from the pregnant body to the maternal body, through liminal stages such as miscarriage and birthing – I highlight how Amos uses the figure of the maternal body not only to challenge dominant tropes of sexuality, but to create an embodied space where normative conceptions of ‘mother’ and ‘mothering’ can be troubled.

Type
Articles
Information
Popular Music , Volume 34 , Issue 2 , May 2015 , pp. 296 - 311
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Amos, T., and Powers, A. 2005. Piece by Piece (New York, Broadway Books)Google Scholar
Augé, M. 2008[1995]. Non-Places: An Introduction to Supermodernity (London and New York, Verso)Google Scholar
Bitten and Bound website. http://www.bittenandbound.com (accessed 2 April 2011)Google Scholar
Burns, L., and Lafrance, M. 2002. Disruptive Divas: Feminism, Identity and Popular Music (New York, Routledge)Google Scholar
Burns, L., and Woods, A. 2004. ‘Authenticity, appropriation, signification: Tori Amos on gender, race and violence in covers of Billie Holiday and Eminem’, Music Theory Online, 10/2Google Scholar
Caruth, C. 1996. Unclaimed Experience: Trauma, Narrative and History (Baltimore, MD, Johns Hopkins University Press)Google Scholar
Cixous, H. 1976. ‘The laugh of the Medusa’, Signs, 1/4, Summer, pp. 875–93Google Scholar
Cusick, S.G. 2006[1994]. ‘On a lesbian relationship with music: a serious effort not to think straight’, in Queering the Pitch: The New Gay and Lesbian Musicology, ed. Brett, P., Thomas, G. and Wood, E. (New York, Routledge), pp. 67–83Google Scholar
De Beauvoir, S. 1997[1949]. The Second Sex (London, Vintage)Google Scholar
Grosz, E. 1994. Volatile Bodies (Bloomington, IN, Indiana University Press)Google Scholar
Kristeva, J. 1982. Powers of Horror (New York and Guildford, Columbia University Press)Google Scholar
Lankford, R.D. Jr. 2010. Women Singer-Songwriters in Rock: A Populist Rebellion in the 1990s (Lanham, MD, Scarecrow Press)Google Scholar
Longhurst, R. 2001. Bodies: Exploring Fluid Boundaries (London, Routledge)Google Scholar
Longhurst, R. 2008. Maternities: Gender, Bodies and Space (London, Routledge)Google Scholar
McMullen, T. 2006. ‘Corpo-realities: keepin’ it real in “music and embodiment” scholarship’, Current Musicology, 82, Fall, pp. 61–80Google Scholar
Mulvey, L. 1989[1975]. ‘Visual pleasure and narrative cinema’, Screen, 16/3, pp. 6–18Google Scholar
Quinn, K.E. 2009. ‘A rare beauty: the orchid in Western art’, in Orchid Biology: Reviews and Perspectives, ed. Kull, A. and Wong, M. (Dordrecht, Springer)Google Scholar
Rycenga, J. 1997. ‘Sisterhood: a loving lesbian ear listens to progressive heterosexual women's rock music’, in Keeping Score: Music, Disciplinarity, Culture, ed. Schwartz, D., Kassabian, A. and Siegler, L. (Charlottesville, VA, University Press of Virginia), pp. 204–28Google Scholar
Scarlet Stories website. Transcription of CD. http://www.hereinmyhead.com/collect/walk.walk10.html (accessed 2 April 2011)Google Scholar
Tyler, I. 2001. ‘Skin-tight: celebrity, pregnancy and subjectivity’, in Thinking Through the Skin, ed. Ahmed, S. and Stacey, J. (London and New York, Routledge), pp. 69–83Google Scholar
Walker, M.B. 1998. Philosophy and the Maternal Body: Reading Silence (London and New York, Routledge)Google Scholar
Weiss, G., and Haber, H.F. (eds) 1999. Perspectives on Embodiment: The Intersections of Nature and Culture (London, Routledge)Google Scholar
Whiteley, S. 2000. ‘Authenticity, truthfulness and community: Tori Amos, Courtney Love, PJ Harvey and Björk’, in Women and Popular Music: Sexuality, Identity and Subjectivity (Oxford, Routledge), pp. 196–213Google Scholar
Whiteley, S. 2005. Too Much Too Young: Popular Music, Age and Gender (New York, Routledge)Google Scholar

Discography

Amos, T.Boys for Pele. Atlantic/WEA, 7567-82862-2. 1996Google Scholar
Amos, T.from the choirgirl hotel. Atlantic/WEA, 7567830952. 1998Google Scholar
Amos, T.Scarlet Stories. 2002Google Scholar
Amos, T.Scarlet's Walk. Sony, EK86412. 2002Google Scholar