Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T17:09:59.675Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The jukebox of history: narratives of loss and desire in the discourse of country music

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2008

Extract

Is country music for real? This question haunts country's detractors, critics, fans and analysts, as it haunts all students of popular culture. Country music is only an extreme example of the instability, contradiction and ironic reflexivity characteristic of popular cultural forms in general in postmodern, capitalist society. It seems impossible to locate an ‘authentic’ country music text, performance or context, one which represents the ‘real’ life of a ‘real’ community without alienated nostalgia, false consciousness or kitschy commodification. On the other hand, country remains more overtly loyal to the experience, desires and language of a particular class and culture than almost any other major popular musical genre. A unique, if elusive core of ‘authenticity’ tantalises country's supporters and infuriates its critics, but attempts to separate the true from the false in country music, whether at the level of text, context or performance, are bound to fail. Country resists all such attempts; it incorporates and combines the true and the false into a poetic which is explicitly deconstructive of the ideology which these categories encode.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Connor, S. 1989. Postmodernist culture (London)Google Scholar
Derrida, J. 1978. Writing and Difference (Chicago)Google Scholar
Frith, S. 1988. Music for Pleasure: Essays in the Sociology of Pop (London)Google Scholar
Gaillard, F. 1978. Watermelon Wine: The Spirit of Country Music (New York)Google Scholar
Gleason, H. 1988. ‘Beyond labels: marketers search for fresh ways to promote new, improved country’, Billboard, 15 10, p. C-6.Google Scholar
Horstman, D. 1986. Sing Your Heart Out, Country Boy (Nashville)Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. 1960. ‘Concluding statement: linguistics and poetics’ in Style in Language, ed. Sebeok, T. A. (Cambridge)Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. 1981. ‘Poetry of grammar and grammar of poetry’, in Selected Writings III (The Hague), pp. 8797 (orig. 1960)Google Scholar
Jensen, J. 1984. ‘Creating the Nashville sound: a case-study in commercial culture production’, unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of IllinoisGoogle Scholar
Malone, B. 1985. Country Music U.S.A.: A Fifty Year History (2nd ed.) (Austin)Google Scholar
Mannheim, B. 1986. ‘Popular song & popular grammar, poetry & metalanguage’, Word, 37 (1–2), pp. 4575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, S. 1988. ‘Crowded country airwaves: radio, records uneasily share new prosperity; new artist door begins to close’, Billboard, 15 10, p. C-6Google Scholar
Stewart, K. n.d. ‘The narrative poetics of American “country” lament: a re-presentation of country music's lost love and Appalachia's litanies of the dead’ (manuscript)Google Scholar
Stewart, K. 1990. ‘Backtalking the wilderness: “Appalachian” engenderings’, in Uncertain Terms: Negotiating Gender in American Culture, eds. Ginsburg, Faye and Tsing, Anne (Boston)Google Scholar
Williams, R. 1977. Marxism and Literature (Oxford)Google Scholar
Willis, P. 1981. Learning to Labor (New York)Google Scholar