Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T02:44:18.144Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Yikes! Are we disgusted by politicians?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 September 2020

Bert N. Bakker Open the ORCID record for Bert N. Bakker [Opens in a new window] ,
Gijs Schumacher Open the ORCID record for Gijs Schumacher [Opens in a new window]  and
Maaike D. Homan Open the ORCID record for Maaike D. Homan [Opens in a new window]
Bert N. Bakker*
Affiliation:
University of Amsterdam
Gijs Schumacher
Affiliation:
University of Amsterdam
Maaike D. Homan
Affiliation:
University of Amsterdam
*
Correspondence: Bert N. Bakker, Amsterdam School of Communication Research. University of Amsterdam, 1000 NG, the Netherlands. Email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

In the political domain, disgust is primarily portrayed as an emotion that explains individual differences in pathogen avoidance. We hypothesized that political rhetoric accusing opponents of moral transgressions also elicits disgust responses. In this registered report, we present the results from a laboratory experiment. We find that participants self-report higher disgust and have stronger physiological (Levator labii) responses to pictures of out-party leaders compared with in-party leaders. Participants also report higher disgust in response to moral violations of in-party leaders. There is more suggestive evidence that in-party leaders evoke more labii activity when they commit moral violations than when out-party leaders do. The impact of individual differences in moral disgust and partisanship strength is very limited to absent. Intriguingly, on average, the physiological and self-reported disgust responses to the treatment are similar, but individuals differ in whether their response is physiological or cognitive. This motivates further theorizing regarding the concordance of emotional responses.

Keywords

Moral violationdisgustphysiologyself-reportregistered report
Type
Article
Information
Politics and the Life Sciences , Volume 39 , Special Issue 2: Special Issue: Disgust and Political Attitudes , Fall 2020 , pp. 135 - 153
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Association for Politics and the Life Sciences

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aarøe, L., Petersen, M. B., & Arceneaux, K. (2017). The behavioral immune system shapes political intuitions: Why and how individual differences in disgust sensitivity underlie opposition to immigration. American Political Science Review, 111(2), 277–294.Google Scholar
Arceneaux, K., & Bakker, B. N. (2019). Concordance in emotional processing and political attitudes pre-analysis plan. OSF. https://osf.io/nxvyc/Google Scholar
Arceneaux, K., Dunaway, J., & Soroka, S. N. (2018). Elites are people, too: The effects of threat sensitivity on policymakers’ spending priorities. PLOS ONE, 13(4), e0193781.Google ScholarPubMed
Arceneaux, K., & Vander Wielen, R. J. (2017). Taming intuition: How reflection minimizes partisan reasoning and promotes democratic accountability. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Associated Press. (2016, April 24). Trump: Clinton is “as crooked as they come.” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z_u4rq_03Y0Google Scholar
Bakker, B. N., Lelkes, Y., & Malka, A. (2020). Understanding partisan cue receptivity: Tests of predictions from the bounded rationality and expressive utility perspectives. Journal of Politics, 82(3), 1061–1077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakker, B. N., Schumacher, G., Gothreau, C., & Arceneaux, K. (2020). Conservatives and liberals have similar physiological responses to threats. Nature Human Behaviour, 4, 613–621.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Balzer, A., & Jacobs, C. M. (2011). Gender and physiological effects in connecting disgust to political preferences. Social Science Quarterly, 92(5), 1297–1313.Google Scholar
Bankert, A., Huddy, L., & Rosema, M. (2017). Measuring partisanship as a social identity in multi-party systems. Political Behavior, 39(1), 103–132.Google Scholar
Bisgaard, M., & Slothuus, R. (2018). Partisan elites as culprits? How party cues shape partisan perceptual gaps. American Journal of Political Science, 62(2), 456–469.Google Scholar
Blair, G., Cooper, J., Coppock, A., & Humphreys, M. (2019). Declaring and diagnosing research designs. American Political Science Review, 113(3), 838–859.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bolls, P. D., Lang, A., & Potter, R. F. (2001). The effects of message valence and listener arousal on attention, memory, and facial muscular responses to radio advertisements. Communication Research, 28(5), 627–651.10.1177/009365001028005003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (2000). Measuring emotion: Behavior, feeling, and physiology. In Lane, R. & Nadel, L. (Eds.), Cognitive Neuroscience of Emotion (pp. 242–276). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brooks, D. J., & Geer, J. G. (2007). Beyond negativity: The effects of incivility on the electorate. American Journal of Political Science, 51(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, L. M., Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (2006). Affective reactions to pictures of ingroup and outgroup members. Biological Psychology, 71(3), 303–311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bullock, J. G. (2011). Elite influence on public opinion in an informed electorate. American Political Science Review, 105(3), 496–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, E. A., Gross, J. J., & Barnard, K. (2014). Testing the effects of suppression and reappraisal on emotional concordance using a multivariate multilevel model. Biological Psychology, 98, 6–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cannon, P. R., Schnall, S., & White, M. (2010). Transgressions and expressions. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(3), 325–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, H. A., Kim, D. A., Susskind, J. M., & Anderson, A. K. (2009). In bad taste: Evidence for the oral origins of moral disgust. Science, 323(5918), 1222–1226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
CNN. (2016, June 22). Presumptive GOP nominee Donald Trump slams Hillary Clinton. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WfPmFlvxlbUGoogle Scholar
Codispoti, M., Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (2001). Affective reactions to briefly presented pictures. Psychophysiology, 38(3), 474–478.Google ScholarPubMed
Dodd, M. D., Balzer, A., Jacobs, C. M., Gruszczynski, M. W., Smith, K. B., & Hibbing, J. R. (2012). The political left rolls with the good and the political right confronts the bad: Connecting physiology and cognition to preferences. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 367(1589), 640–649.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dolezal, M., Ennser-Jedenastik, L., & Müller, W. C. (2016). Negative campaigning and the logic of retaliation in multiparty competition. International Journal of Press/Politics, 21(2), 253–272.10.1177/1940161215626566CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elmelund-Præstekær, C. (2010). Beyond American negativity: Toward a general understanding of the determinants of negative campaigning. European Political Science Review, 2(1), 137–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evers, C., Hopp, H., Gross, J. J., Fischer, A. H., Manstead, A. S., & Mauss, I. B. (2014). Emotion response coherence: A dual-process perspective. Biological Psychology, 98, 43–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Franco, A., Malhotra, N., & Simonovits, G. (2014). Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer. Science, 345(6203), 1502–1505.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fridkin, K. L., Kenney, P. J., & Woodall, G. S. (2009). Bad for men, better for women: The impact of stereotypes during negative campaigns. Political Behavior, 31, 53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haidt, J., Rozin, P., Mccauley, C., & Imada, S. (1997). Body, psyche, and culture: The relationship between disgust and morality. Psychology and Developing Societies, 9(1), 107–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofmann, S. G., & Kim, H.-J. (2006). Anxiety goes under the skin: Behavioral inhibition, anxiety, and autonomic arousal in speech-anxious males. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(7), 1441–1451.10.1016/j.paid.2005.12.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopmann, D. N., Vliegenthart, R., & Maier, J. (2018). The effects of tone, focus, and incivility in election debates. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 28(3), 283–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huddy, L., Bankert, A., & Davies, C. (2018). Expressive versus instrumental partisanship in multiparty European systems. Political Psychology, 39, 173–199.Google Scholar
Huddy, L., Mason, L., & Aarøe, L. (2015). Expressive partisanship: Campaign involvement, political emotion, and partisan identity. American Political Science Review, 109(1), 1–17.10.1017/S0003055414000604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutcherson, C. A., & Gross, J. J. (2011). The moral emotions: A social–functionalist account of anger, disgust, and contempt. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(4), 719–737.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D., Iyer, R., & Haidt, J. (2011). Disgust sensitivity, political conservatism, and voting. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(5), 537–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iyengar, S., Sood, G., & Lelkes, Y. (2012). Affect, not ideology: A social identity perspective on polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(3), 405–431.10.1093/poq/nfs038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, W. (1884). What is an emotion? Mind, 9(34), 188–205.10.1093/mind/os-IX.34.188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kam, C. D. (2005). Who toes the party line? cues, values, and individual differences. Political Behavior, 27(2), 163–182.10.1007/s11109-005-1764-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenski, K., Filer, C. R., & Conway-Silva, B. A. (2018). Lying, liars, and lies: Incivility in 2016 presidential candidate and campaign tweets during the invisible primary. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(3), 286–299.10.1177/0002764217724840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kludt, T. (2016, September 21). Pew poll: Most voters “frustrated,” “disgusted” with 2016 election. CNN. https://edition.cnn.com/2016/09/21/politics/pew-poll-hillary-clinton-donald-trump/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
Kreibig, S. D. (2010). Autonomic nervous system activity in emotion: A review. Biological Psychology, 84(3), 394–421.Google ScholarPubMed
Lang, P. J. (1968). Fear reduction and fear behavior: Problems in treating a construct. Research in Psychotherapy Conference, 3, 90–102.10.1037/10546-004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, P. J. (2014). Emotion’s response patterns: The brain and the autonomic nervous system. Emotion Review, 6(2), 93–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (1997). International Affective Picture System (IAPS): Technical manual and affective ratings. Bethesda, MD: NIMH Center for the Study of Emotion and Attention.Google Scholar
Lang, P. J., Greenwald, M. K., Bradley, M. M., & Hamm, A. O. (1993). Looking at pictures: Affective, facial, visceral, and behavioral reactions. Psychophysiology, 30(3), 261–273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
LeDoux, J. E., & Pine, D. S. (2016). Using neuroscience to help understand fear and anxiety: A two-system framework. American Journal of Psychiatry, 173(11), 1083–1093.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lodge, M., & Taber, C. S. (2005). The automaticity of affect for political leaders, groups, and issues: An experimental test of the hot cognition hypothesis. Political Psychology, 26(3), 455–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcus, G. E., Neuman, W. R., & MacKuen, M. B. (2015). Measuring emotional response: Comparing alternative approaches to measurement. Political Science Research and Methods, 5(4), 733–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molho, C., Tybur, J. M., Güler, E., Balliet, D., & Hofmann, W. (2017). Disgust and anger relate to different aggressive responses to moral violations. Psychological science, 28(5), 609–619.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murray, M. (2018, January 19). Poll: More than half of Americans strongly disapprove of trump. NBC News. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/first-read/poll-more-half-americans-strongly-disapprove-trump-n838926Google Scholar
Mutz, D. C. (2006). How the mass media divide us. In Nivola, P. S. & Brady, D. W. (Eds.), Red and blue nation? Characteristics and causes of America’s polarized politics (pp. 223–262). Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Mutz, D. C., & Reeves, B. (2005). The new videomalaise: Effects of televised incivility on political trust. American Political Science Review, 99(1), 1–15.10.1017/S0003055405051452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nabi, R. L. (2002). The theoretical versus the lay meaning of disgust: Implications for emotion research. Cognition & Emotion, 16(5), 695–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nai, A. (2018). Going negative, worldwide: Towards a general understanding of determinants and targets of negative campaigning. Government and Opposition, 55(3), 430–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osmundsen, M., Hendry, D. J., Laustsen, L., Smith, K. B., & Petersen, M. B. (2019). The psychophysiology of political ideology: Replications, reanalysis and recommendations. PsyArXiv. https://psyarxiv.com/49hfg/Google Scholar
Oxley, D. R., Smith, K. B., Alford, J. R., Hibbing, M. V., Miller, J. L., Scalora, M., … Hibbing, J. R. (2008). Political attitudes vary with physiological traits. Science, 321(5896), 1667–1670.Google ScholarPubMed
Petersen, M. B., Skov, M., Serritzlew, S., & Ramsøy, T. (2013). Motivated reasoning and political parties: Evidence for increased processing in the face of party cues. Political Behavior, 35(4), 831–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rozin, P., Lowery, L., Imada, S., & Haidt, J. (1999). The CAD triad hypothesis: A mapping between three moral emotions (contempt, anger, disgust) and three moral codes (community, autonomy, divinity). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(4), 574–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaefer, H. S., Larson, C. L., Davidson, R. J., & Coan, J. A. (2014). Brain, body, and cognition: Neural, physiological and self-report correlates of phobic and normative fear. Biological Psychology, 98, 59–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, K. B., Oxley, D., Hibbing, M. V., Alford, J. R., & Hibbing, J. R. (2011). Disgust sensitivity and the neurophysiology of left-right political orientations. PLOS ONE, 6(10), e25552.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sobieraj, S., & Berry, J. M. (2011). From incivility to outrage: Political discourse in blogs, talk radio, and cable news. Political Communication, 28(1), 19–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soroka, S. N. (2014). Negativity in democratic politics: Causes and consequences. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soroka, S. N., & McAdams, S. (2015). News, politics, and negativity. Political Communication, 32(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, R., Schienle, A., Sarlo, M., Palomba, D., Walter, B., & Vaitl, D. (2005). Influences of disgust sensitivity on hemodynamic responses towards a disgust-inducing film clip. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 57(1), 61–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stark, R., Walter, B., Schienle, A., & Vaitl, D. (2005). Psychophysiological correlates of disgust and disgust sensitivity. Journal of Psychophysiology, 19(1), 50–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755–769.10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tassinary, L. G., Cacioppo, J. T., & Vanman, E. J. (2007). The skeletomotor system: Surface electromyography. In Cacioppo, J. T., Tassinary, L. G., & Berntson, G. (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (pp. 267–300). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tybur, J. M., & de Vries, R. E. (2013). Disgust sensitivity and the HEXACO model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 55(6), 660–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tybur, J. M., Lieberman, D., & Griskevicius, V. (2009). Microbes, mating, and morality: Individual differences in three functional domains of disgust. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(1), 103–122.Google ScholarPubMed
Tybur, J. M., Lieberman, D., Kurzban, R., & DeScioli, P. (2013). Disgust: Evolved function and structure. Psychological Review, 120(1), 65–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vrana, S. R. (1993). The psychophysiology of disgust: Differentiating negative emotional contexts with facial EMG. Psychophysiology, 30(3), 279–286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walter, A. S. (2014). Choosing the enemy: Attack behaviour in a multiparty system. Party Politics, 20(3), 311–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westwood, S. J., Iyengar, S., Walgrave, S., Leonisio, R., Miller, L., & Strijbis, O. (2018). The tie that divides: Cross-national evidence of the primacy of partyism. European Journal of Political Research, 57(2), 333–354.Google Scholar
Whitton, A. E., Henry, J. D., Rendell, P. G., & Grisham, J. R. (2014). Disgust, but not anger provocation, enhances levator labii superioris activity during exposure to moral transgressions. Biological Psychology, 96, 48–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Bakker et al. supplementary material

Appendix

Download Bakker et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 2.5 MB