Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-23T05:08:15.873Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Women, behavior, and evolution: Understanding the debate between feminist evolutionists and evolutionary psychologists

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2016

Laurette T. Liesen
Laurette T. Liesen*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Lewis University, One University, Parkway, Romeoville, IL 60446, USA [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Often since the early 1990s, feminist evolutionists have criticized evolutionary psychologists, finding fault in their analyses of human male and female reproductive behavior. Feminist evolutionists have criticized various evolutionary psychologists for perpetuating gender stereotypes, using questionable methodology, and exhibiting a chill toward feminism. Though these criticisms have been raised many times, the conflict itself has not been fully analyzed. Therefore, I reconsider this conflict, both in its origins and its implications. I find that the approaches and perspectives of feminist evolutionists and evolutionary psychologists are distinctly different, leading many of the former to work in behavioral ecology, primatology, and evolutionary biology. Invitingly to feminist evolutionists, these three fields emphasize social behavior and the influences of environmental variables; in contrast, evolutionary psychology has come to rely on assumptions deemphasizing the pliability of psychological mechanisms and the flexibility of human behavior. In behavioral ecology, primatology, and evolutionary biology, feminist evolutionists have found old biases easy to correct and new hypotheses practical to test, offering new insights into male and female behavior, explaining the emergence and persistence of patriarchy, and potentially bringing closer a prime feminist goal, sexual equality.

Type
Research Article
Information
Politics and the Life Sciences , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , March 2007 , pp. 51 - 70
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Hrdy, Sarah Blaffer, The Woman That Never Evolved (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1981).Google Scholar
2.Liesen, Laurette, “Feminism and the Politics of Reproductive Strategies,” Politics and the Life Sciences, 1995, 14:145–162.Google Scholar
3.Daly, Martin and Wilson, Margo, “Human Evolutionary Psychology and Animal Behavior,” Animal Behavior, 1999, 57:509–519.Google Scholar
4.Hrdy, Sarah Blaffer, The Woman That Never Evolved: With a New Preface (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999), p. xix.Google Scholar
5.Fausto-Sterling, Anne, The Myths of Gender: Biological Theories about Women and Men, second ed. (New York: Basic Books, 1992).Google Scholar
6.Bleier, Ruth, Science and Gender: A Critique of Biology and Its Theories on Women (New York: Pergamon Press, 1984).Google Scholar
7.Tang-Martinez, Zuleyma, “The Curious Courtship of Sociobiology and Feminism: A Case of Irreconcilable Differences,” in Feminism and Evolutionary Biology: Boundaries, Intersections, and Frontiers, Gowaty, Patricia Adair, ed. (New York: Chapman and Hall, 1997), pp. 116–117.Google Scholar
8.Greene, Sheila, “Biological Determinism: Persisting Problems for the Psychology of Women,” Feminism and Psychology, 2004, 14(3):431–435.Google Scholar
9.Cosmides, Leda et al., “Introduction: Evolutionary Psychology and Conceptual Integration,” in The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture, Barkow, Jerome H. et al., eds. (New York: Oxford University Press, 1992), pp. 7–8.Google Scholar
10.Geary, David, Male/Female: The Evolution of Human Sex Differences (Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1998), pp. 123, 151–152.Google Scholar
11.Campbell, Anne, A Mind of Her Own: The Evolutionary Psychology of Women (New York: Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
12.Tang-Martinez, , “The Curious Courtship of Sociobiology and Feminism,” pp. 116–150.Google Scholar
13.Fausto-Sterling, Anne, “Beyond Difference: Feminism and Evolutionary Psychology,” in Alas, Poor Darwin, Rose, Hilary and Rose, Steven, eds. (New York: Harmony Books, 2000), pp. 216–218.Google Scholar
14.Buss, David, “Evolutionary Insights into Feminism and the ‘Battle of the Sexes,”’ in Sex, Power, Conflict: Evolutionary and Feminist Perspectives, Buss, David and Malamuth, Neil, eds. (New York: Oxford University Press, 1996), pp. 296–318.Google Scholar
15.Rhoads, Steven E., Taking Sex Differences Seriously (San Francisco: Encounter Books, 2004).Google Scholar
16.Gowaty, Patricia Adair, “Introduction: Darwinian Feminists and Feminist Evolutionists,” in Feminism and Evolutionary Biology: Boundaries, Intersections, and Frontiers, Gowaty, Patricia Adair, ed. (New York: Chapman & Hall, 1997), pp. 13–14.Google Scholar
17.Liesen, “Feminism and the Politics of Reproductive Strategies,” p. 145.Google Scholar
18.Gowaty, “Introduction: Darwinian Feminists and Feminist Evolutionists,” p. 14.Google Scholar
19.Vandermassen, Griet, Who's Afraid of Charles Darwin? Debating Feminism and Evolutionary Theory (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2005), p. 2.Google Scholar
20.Darwin, Charles, The Origins of Species (New York: Collier Press, 1859).Google Scholar
21.Darwin, Charles, The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex (London: John Murray, 1871).Google Scholar
22.Williams, George, Adaptation and Natural Selection (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1966).Google Scholar
23.Hamilton, William, “Evolution of Altruistic Behavior,” The American Naturalist, 1964, 97:354–356.Google Scholar
24.Trivers, Robert, “The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism,” The Quarterly Review of Biology, 1971, 46(4):35–57.Google Scholar
25.Trivers, Robert, “Parental Investment and Sexual Selection,” in Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, Campbell, Bernard, ed. (Chicago: Aldine, 1972).Google Scholar
26.Wilson, Edward O., Sociobiology: The New Synthesis (Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press, 1975).Google Scholar
27.Stamps, Judy, “Sociobiology: Its Evolution and Intellectual Descendants,” Politics and the Fife Sciences, 1995, 14:191.Google Scholar
28.Daly, Martin and Wilson, Margo, Sex, Evolution, and Behavior, second ed. (Boston: PWS Publisher, 1983).Google Scholar
29.Symons, Donald, The Evolution of Sexuality (New York: Oxford University Press, 1979).Google Scholar
30.Buss, David, “Mating,” in The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology, Buss, David, ed. (Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 2005), pp. 251–253.Google Scholar
31.Bateman, A. J., “Intra-Sexual Selection in Drosophila,” Heredity, 1948, 2:349–368.Google Scholar
32.Symons, The Evolution of Sexuality.Google Scholar
33.Tooby, John and Cosmides, Leda, “Conceptual Foundations of Evolutionary Psychology,” in The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology, Buss, David, ed. (Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 2005), p. 5.Google Scholar
34.Tooby, and Cosmides, , “Conceptual Foundations of Evolutionary Psychology,” p. 14.Google Scholar
35.Cosmides, et al., “Introduction: Evolutionary Psychology and Conceptual Integration,” pp. 7–9.Google Scholar
36.Buss, David, The Evolution of Desire: Strategies for Human Mating (New York: Basic Books, 1994), p. 3.Google Scholar
37.Daly, and Wilson, , “Human Evolutionary Psychology and Animal Behavior.”Google Scholar
38.Tooby, and Cosmides, , “Conceptual Foundations of Evolutionary Psychology,” p. 8.Google Scholar
39.Symons, Donald, “On the Use and Misuse of Darwinism in the Study of Human Behavior,” in The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture, Barkow, Jerome H. et al., eds. (New York: Oxford University Press, 1992), p. 138.Google Scholar
40.Buss, David, “Sex Differences in Human Mate Preferences: Evolutionary Hypotheses Tested in 37 Cultures,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1989, 12:1–49.Google Scholar
41.Buss, , The Evolution of Desire.Google Scholar
42.Geary, , Male/Female, p. 161.Google Scholar
43.Buss, David, Evolutionary Psychology: The New Science of the Mind (Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1999).Google Scholar
44.Wright, Robert, “Feminists, Meet Mr. Darwin,” New Republic, 28 November 1994, pp. 34–46.Google Scholar
45.Wright, Robert, The Moral Animal: Evolutionary Psychology and Everyday Life (New York: Vintage Books, 1994), pp. 135–137.Google Scholar
46.Buss, , “Evolutionary Insights into Feminism and the ‘Battle of the Sexes,”’ pp. 296–318.Google Scholar
47.Pinker, Steven, The Blank Slate: Modern Denial of Human Nature (New York: Viking Press, 2003).Google Scholar
48.Rhoads, , Taking Sex Differences Seriously.Google Scholar
49.Wright, , “Feminists, Meet Mr. Darwin.”Google Scholar
50.Hrdy, , The Woman That Never Evolved.Google Scholar
51.Hrdy, Sarah Blaffer, “Empathy, Polyandry, and the Myth of the Coy Female,” in Feminist Approaches to Science, Bleier, Ruth, ed. (New York: Pergamon, 1986), pp. 119–146.Google Scholar
52.Lancaster, Jane, “A Feminist and Evolutionary Biologist Looks at Women,” Yearbook of Physical Anthropology, 1991, 34:1–11.Google Scholar
53.Smuts, Barbara, “Male Aggression against Women: An Evolutionary Perspective,” Human Nature, 1992, 3:1–44.Google Scholar
54.Gowaty, Patricia Adair, “Evolutionary Biology and Feminism,” Human Nature, 1992, 3:217–249.Google Scholar
55.Wright, , The Moral Animal, p. 69.Google Scholar
56.Buss, , The Evolution of Desire, p. 212.Google Scholar
57.Buss, , “Evolutionary Insights into Feminism and the ‘Battle of the Sexes,”’ p. 297.Google Scholar
58.Liesen, Laurette, “The Legacy of Woman the Gatherer: The Emergence of Evolutionary Feminism,” Evolutionary Anthropology, 1998, 6:111–113.Google Scholar
59.Pinker, , The Blank Slate, p. 342.Google Scholar
60.Ridley, Matt, Nature Via Nurture: Genes, Experience, and What Makes Us Human (New York: Harper Collins Publishers, 2003), p. 246.Google Scholar
61.Hrdy, Sarah Blaffer, “Raising Darwin's Consciousness: Female Sexuality and the Prehominid Origins of Patriarchy,” Human Nature, 1997, 8:2–4.Google Scholar
62.Hrdy, Sarah Blaffer, Mother Nature, (New York: Pantheon, 1999).Google Scholar
63.Rhoads, , Taking Sex Differences Seriously.Google Scholar
64.Vandermassen, , Who's Afraid of Charles Darwin?, pp. 147–194.Google Scholar
65.Buss, , “Evolutionary Insights into Feminism and the ‘Battle of the Sexes,”’ p. 308.Google Scholar
66.Vandermassen, , Who's Afraid of Charles Darwin?, p. 188.Google Scholar
67.Tang-Martinez, , “The Curious Courtship of Sociobiology and Feminism.”Google Scholar
68.Buller, David, Adapting Minds: Evolutionary Psychology and the Persistent Quest for Human Nature (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2005).Google Scholar
69.Sayre, Janet, Biological Politics: Feminist and Anti-Feminist Perspectives (London: Tanstock Publications, 1982).Google Scholar
70.Bleier, , Science and Gender.Google Scholar
71.Fausto-Sterling, , The Myths of Gender.Google Scholar
72.Gowaty, Patricia Adair, “Power Asymmetries between the Sexes, Mate Preferences, and Components of Fitness,” in Evolution, Gender, and Rape, Travis, Cheryl Brown, ed. (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2003), p. 62.Google Scholar
73.Tooby, and Cosmides, , “Conceptual Foundations of Evolutionary Psychology,” p. 22.Google Scholar
74.Hagen, Edward, “Controversial Issues in Evolutionary Psychology,” in The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology, Buss, David, ed. (Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 2005), pp. 145–175.Google Scholar
75.Hagen, , p. 155.Google Scholar
76.Wright, , The Moral Animal, pp. 38–39.Google Scholar
77.Tooby, and Cosmides, , “Conceptual Foundations of Evolutionary Psychology,” pp. 386–387.Google Scholar
78.Foley, Robert, “The Adaptive Legacy of Human Evolution: A Search for Environment of Evolutionary Adaptiveness,” Evolutionary Anthropology, 1996, 4:194–195.Google Scholar
79.Foley, , pp. 195–196.Google Scholar
80.Irons, William, “Adaptively Relevant Environments versus the Environment of Evolutionary Adaptiveness,” Evolutionary Anthropology, 1998, 6:195–196.Google Scholar
81.Hrdy, , Mother Nature, p. 101.Google Scholar
82.Irons, , “Adaptively Relevant Environments versus the Environment of Evolutionary Adaptiveness,” p. 195.Google Scholar
83.Gowaty, , “Power Asymmetries between the Sexes, Mate Preferences, and Components of Fitness,” pp. 68–71.Google Scholar
84.Fausto-Sterling, , “Beyond Difference: Feminism and Evolutionary Psychology.”Google Scholar
85.Hrdy, , Mother Nature.Google Scholar
86.Hrdy, , The Woman that Never Evolved.Google Scholar
87.Gowaty, , “Power Asymmetries between the Sexes, Mate Preferences, and Components of Fitness.”Google Scholar
88.West-Eberhard, Mary Jane, “Phenotypic Plasticity and the Origins of Diversity,” Annual Review of Ecological Systems, 1989, 20:249–278.Google Scholar
89.West-Eberhard, Mary Jane, Developmental Elasticity and Evolution (New York: Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
90.West-Eberhard, , Developmental Plasticity and Evolution, p. 28.Google Scholar
91.Sork, Victoria, “Quantitative Genetics, Feminism, and Evolutionary Theories of Gender Differences,” in Feminism and Evolutionary Biology: Boundaries, Intersections, and Frontiers, Gowaty, Patricia Adair, ed. (New York: Chapman and Hall, 1997), p. 107.Google Scholar
92.West-Eberhard, , Developmental Elasticity and Evolution, pp. 16–17.Google Scholar
93.Gowaty, Patricia Adair and Hubbell, Stephen, “Chance, Time Allocation, and the Evolution of Adaptively Flexible Sex Role Behavior,” Integrative and Comparative Biology, 2005, 45:934–936.Google Scholar
94.Gowaty, and Hubbell, , “Chance, Time Allocation, and the Evolution of Adaptively Flexible Sex Role Behavior,” p. 940.Google Scholar
95.Gowaty, , “Power Asymmetries between the Sexes, Mate Preferences, and Components of Fitness.”Google Scholar
96.Hrdy, , “Raising Darwin's Consciousness.”Google Scholar
97.Hrdy, , The Woman that Never Evolved.Google Scholar
98.Zuk, Marlene, Sexual Selections: What We Can and Can't Learn about Sex from Animals (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002).Google Scholar
99.Darwin, , The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex.Google Scholar
100.Bateman, , “Intra-Sexual Selection in Drosophila.”Google Scholar
101.Williams, , Adaptation and Natural Selection.Google Scholar
102.Trivers, , “Parental Investment and Sexual Selection.”Google Scholar
103.Hrdy, , “Empathy, Polyandry, and the Myth of the Coy Female,” pp. 123–129.Google Scholar
104.Hrdy, , “Raising Darwin's Consciousness,” pp. 8–22.Google Scholar
105.Smuts, , “Male Aggression against Women: An Evolutionary Perspective.”Google Scholar
106.Smuts, Barbara, “The Evolutionary Origins of Patriarchy,” Human Nature, 1995, 6:1–32.Google Scholar
107.Zuk, , Sexual Selections.Google Scholar
108.Buss, , “Sex Differences in Human Mate Preferences.”Google Scholar
109.Buss, , The Evolution of Desire.Google Scholar
110.Buller, , Adapting Minds.Google Scholar
111.Hrdy, , “Raising Darwin's Consciousness,” pp. 3–5.Google Scholar
112.Smuts, Barbara and Gubernick, David, “Male-Infant Relationships in Nonhuman Primates: Paternal Investment or Mating Effort?” in Father-Child Relations: Cultural and Biosocial Contexts, Hewlett, B. S., ed. (Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter, 1992).Google Scholar
113.Gowaty, , “Evolutionary Biology and Feminism.”Google Scholar
114.Gowaty, Patricia Adair, “Battle of the Sexes and Origins of Monogamy,” in Partnerships in Birds: The Study of Monogamy, Black, Jeffrey M., ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
115.Gowaty, Patricia Adair, “Sexual Dialectics, Sexual Selection, and Variation in Mating Behavior,” in Feminism and Evolutionary Biology: Boundaries, Intersections, and Frontiers, Gowaty, Patricia Adair, ed. (New York: Chapman & Hall, 1997), pp. 351–384.Google Scholar
116.Gowaty, , “Power Asymmetries between the Sexes, Mate Preferences, and Components of Fitness.”Google Scholar
117.Gowaty, and Hubbell, , “Chance, Time Allocation, and the Evolution of Adaptively Flexible Sex Role Behavior.”Google Scholar
118.Gowaty, , “Sexual Dialectics, Sexual Selection, and Variation in Mating Behavior,” pp. 367–369.Google Scholar
119.Gowaty, , “Sexual Dialectics, Sexual Selection, and Variation in Mating Behavior,” pp. 369–378.Google Scholar
120.Buss, , The Evolution of Desire, pp. 211–214.Google Scholar
121.Smuts, , “The Evolutionary Origins of Patriarchy.”Google Scholar
122.Gowaty, , “Battle of the Sexes and Origins of Monogamy.”Google Scholar
123.Buss, , “Evolutionary Insights into Feminism and the ‘Battle of the Sexes,”’ p. 308.Google Scholar
124.Buss, , The Evolution of Desire, p. 212.Google Scholar
125.Buss, , “Sex Differences in Human Mate Preferences.”Google Scholar
126.Buss, , The Evolution of Desire.Google Scholar
127.Waage, Jonathan and Gowaty, Patricia Adair, “Myths of Genetic Determinism,” in Feminism and Evolutionary Biology: Boundaries, Intersections, and Frontiers, Gowaty, Patricia Adair, ed. (New York: Chapman & Hall, 1997), p. 606.Google Scholar
128.Small, Meredith, “Are We Losers? Putting a Mating Theory to the Test,” New York Times, 30 March 1999, p. F5.Google Scholar
129.Buller, , Adapting Minds, p. 459.Google Scholar
130.Simpson, Jeffrey and Campbell, Lorne, “Methods of Evolutionary Sciences,” in The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology, Buss, David, ed. (Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 2005), pp. 119–144.Google Scholar
131.Kaplan, Hillard and Gangstad, Steven, “Life History Theory and Evolutionary Psychology,” in The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology, Buss, David, ed. (Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 2005), p. 69.Google Scholar
132.Gangestad, Steven and Simpson, Jeffrey, “The Evolution of Human Mating: Trade-offs and Strategic Pluralism,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2000, 23:575–576.Google Scholar
133.Hrdy, , The Woman That Never Evolved, 1981.Google Scholar
134.Hrdy, , “Raising Darwin's Consciousness.”Google Scholar
135.Gowaty, , “Evolutionary Biology and Feminism.”Google Scholar
136.Gangestad, and Simpson, , “The Evolution of Human Mating: Trade-offs and Strategic Pluralism,” p. 574.Google Scholar
137.Low, Bobbi, Why Sex Matters: A Darwinian Look at Human Behavior (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000), pp. 1–18.Google Scholar
138.Zuk, , Sexual Selections.Google Scholar
139.Zuk, , Sexual Selections, p. 11.Google Scholar
140.Lancaster, , “A Feminist and Evolutionary Biologist Looks at Women,” p. 9.Google Scholar
141.Darwin, , The Origins of Species.Google Scholar
142.Darwin, , The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex.Google Scholar
143.Hamilton, , “Evolution of Altruistic Behavior.”Google Scholar
144.Trivers, , “The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism.”Google Scholar
145.Trivers, , “Parental Investment and Sexual Selection.”Google Scholar
146.Low, , 2000.Google Scholar
147.Mulder, Monique Borgerhoff et al., “The Place of Behavioral Ecological Anthropology in Evolutionary Social Science,” in Human by Nature: Between Biology and the Social Sciences, Weingart, Peter et al., eds. (Muhwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 1997), pp. 254–258.Google Scholar
148.Smith, Eric Alden, “Three Styles in the Evolutionary Analysis of Human Behavior,” in Adaptation and Human Behavior: An Anthropological Perspective, Cronk, Lee and Irons, William, eds. (New York: Aldine de Gruyter, Inc., 2000), p. 28.Google Scholar
149.Mulder, Borgerhoff, “The Place of Behavioral Ecological Anthropology in Evolutionary Social Science,” p. 256.Google Scholar
150.Waage, and Gowaty, , “Myths of Genetic Determinism,” pp. 594–595.Google Scholar
151.Foley, , “The Adaptive Legacy of Human Evolution: A Search for Environment of Evolutionary Adaptiveness,” p. 195.Google Scholar
152.Cronk, Lee, “Human Behavioral Ecology,” Annual Review of Anthropology, 1991, 20:26–28.Google Scholar
153.Smith, , “Three Styles in the Evolutionary Analysis of Human Behavior,” p. 29.Google Scholar
154.Laland, Kevin N. and Brown, Gillian R., Sense and Nonsense: Evolutionary Perspectives on Human Behavior (New York: Oxford University Press, 2002), pp. 114–120.Google Scholar
155.Cronk, , “Human Behavioral Ecology,” p. 27.Google Scholar
156.Smith, , “Three Styles in the Evolutionary Analysis of Human Behavior,” p. 30.Google Scholar
157.West-Eberhard, , Developmental Plasticity and Evolution, p. 11.Google Scholar
158.West-Eberhard, , “Phenotypic Plasticity and the Origins of Diversity,” p. 249.Google Scholar
159.West-Eberhard, , Developmental Plasticity and Evolution, p. 33.Google Scholar
160.Hrdy, , The Woman that Never Evolved, 1981.Google Scholar
161.Hrdy, , “Empathy, Polyandry, and the Myth of the Coy Female.”Google Scholar
162.Hrdy, , “Raising Darwin's Consciousness.”Google Scholar
163.Gowaty, , “Evolutionary Biology and Feminism.”Google Scholar
164.Gowaty, , “Introduction: Darwinian Feminists and Feminist Evolutionists,” pp. 9–14.Google Scholar
165.Gowaty, , “Power Asymmetries between the Sexes, Mate Preferences, and Components of Fitness,” p. 901.Google Scholar
166.Hrdy, , “Raising Darwin's Consciousness,” pp. 22–33.Google Scholar
167.Hrdy, , “Raising Darwin's Consciousness,” p. 29.Google Scholar
168.Hrdy, , The Woman That Never Evolved, 1981.Google Scholar
169.Smuts, , “The Evolutionary Origins of Patriarchy,” pp. 12–17.Google Scholar
170.Smuts, , “The Evolutionary Origins of Patriarchy,” pp. 17–18.Google Scholar
171.Betzig, Laura, “Sex, Succession, and Stratification in the First Six Civilizations: How Powerful Men Reproduced, Passed Power onto Their Sons, and Used Power to Defend Their Wealth, Women, and Children,” in Social Stratification and Socioeconomic Inequality, Volume 1, Ellis, L., ed. (Westport, CT: Origin Press, 1993).Google Scholar
172.Masters, Roger, “Explaining ‘Male Chauvinism’ and ‘Feminism’: Cultural Differences in Male and Female Reproductive Strategies,” in Biopolitics and Gender, Watts, M., ed. (New York: Hawthorne, 1984).Google Scholar
173.Smuts, , “The Evolutionary Origins of Patriarchy,” pp. 19–20.Google Scholar
174.Fausto-Sterling, Anne, Gowaty, Patricia, and Zuk, Marlene, “Evolutionary Psychology and Darwinian Feminism,” Feminist Studies, 1997, 23:6.Google Scholar
175.West-Eberhard, , Developmental Plasticity and Evolution.Google Scholar