No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Vaccines for Peace: A Response to Commentaries
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 May 2016
Extract
The Vaccines for Peace (VFP) proposal (Geissler, 1992) has been discussed, inter alia, by Graham Pearson and Oliver Thränert (this issue), as well as by Milton Leitenberg (1992a; 1992b) and other participants at the Biesenthal workshop (see Morse, this issue).
- Type
- Continuing Dialogue—Vaccines for Peace
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences
References
Barker, R.B. (1989). Letter to Honorable John Glenn with Replies to Questions Regarding the U.S. Biological Defense Research Program, August 24. In Global Spread of Chemical and Biological Weapons. See U.S. Congress. Senate (1990).Google Scholar
Geissler, E. (1992). “Vaccines for Peace: An International Program of Development and Use of Vaccines Against Dual-Threat Agents.” Politics and the Life Sciences 11:231–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hewlett, R.G. and Hall, J.M. (1989). Atoms for Peace and War. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Huxsoll, D. (1989). Testimony on “Germ Wars: Biological Weapons Proliferation and the New Genetics,” May 17. In Global Spread of Chemical and Biological Weapons. See U.S. Congress. Senate (1990).Google Scholar
Kane, M. (1992). “Introduction of New Vaccines into Public Health Use.” Paper presented at the Biesenthal Workshop on Vaccines for Peace, September 13. To be published inGeissler, E. and Woodall, J.P. (eds.), Vaccines for Peace.New York: Oxford University Press, in preparation.Google Scholar
King, J. (1989). Testimony on “Germ Wars: Biological Weapons Proliferation and the New Genetics,” May 17. In Global Spread of Chemical and Biological Weapons. See U.S. Congress. Senate (1990).Google Scholar
Leitenberg, M. (1992a). “A Note on the Proposal by Dr. Erhard Geissler, ‘Vaccines for Peace: An International Program of Development and Use of Vaccines Against “Dual Use” Agents’.” Distributed among members of the Federation of American Scientists Working Group on Biological and Toxin Weapons Verification.Google Scholar
Leitenberg, M. (1992b). “The Conversion of Biological Warfare Research and Development Facilities to Peaceful Purposes.” Paper presented at the Biesenthal Workshop on Vaccines for Peace, September 12. To be published inGeissler, E. and Woodall, J.P. (eds.), Vaccines for Peace.New York: Oxford University Press, in preparation.Google Scholar
Morse, S. (1992). “Epidemiologic Surveillance for Investigating Chemical or Biological Warfare and for Improving Human Health.” Politics and the Life Sciences 11:28–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, B. (1989). Testimony on “Germ Wars: Biological Weapons Proliferation and the New Genetics,” May 17. In Global Spread of Chemical and Biological Weapons. See U.S. Congress. Senate (1990).Google Scholar
Russell, P. (1992). “The Children's Vaccine Initiative: Technologic and Management Opportunities and Challenges.” Paper presented at the ICGEB Conference, “Biotechnology R&D Trends: Science Policy for Development.” Trieste, October 2. To be published inFalaschi, A. and Tzotzos, G. (eds.), Biotechology R&D Trends: Science Policy for Development. New York: New York Academy of Sciences, in preparation.Google Scholar
Sims, N. (1991). “Biological and Toxin Weapons: The 1972 Convention and the Reinforcement of its Disarmament Treaty Regime (DTR) through the Review Conferences of 1980, 1986, and 1991.” Paper presented at the Interfaculty Seminar, Vrije University, Brussels, November 28.Google Scholar
Snyder, G.H. (1991). Deterrence and Defense: Toward a Theory of National Security. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Quoted byChevrier, M.I., The International Regime to Control Biological and Toxin Weapons: Is It the Best Way to Minimize the Threat? Ph.D. diss., Harvard University, 1991.Google Scholar
United Nations (1991). Final Document of the Third Review Conference of the Parties to the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on their Destruction. BWC/CONF.III/23 September 27.Google Scholar
U.S. Congress. Senate (1990). Global Spread of Chemical and Biological Weapons. Hearings before the Committee on Governmental Affairs and its Permanent Subcommittee on Investigation. 101st Congress, 1st session.Google Scholar
Wheelis, M. (1992). “Strengthening Biological Weapons Control through Global Epidemiological Surveillance” [with commentaries and response]. Politics and the Life Sciences 11:179–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar