Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T13:39:16.914Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Politics and Genetic Engineering

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2016

Robert H. Blank
Robert H. Blank*
Affiliation:
University of Canterbury, New Zealand
Get access

Extract

THE PURPOSE OF THIS short note is to update readers on recent developments in, and political implications of, genetic engineering, a critical tool in the expanding field of biotechnology. Based on new understanding of the mechanisms of DNA, molecular biologists are now able to chemically cut genes or sets of genes from one organism and splice them into the DNA of another. This is called recombinant DNA (rDNA) technology. Although these techniques were first applied to bacteria and yeasts, in the last decade researchers have made remarkable strides in putting foreign genes into more complex plants and animals.

Type
Update
Information
Politics and the Life Sciences , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , February 1992 , pp. 81 - 85
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barnes, D.M.(1988). “The Biological Tangle of Drug Addiction.” Science 241:415–417.Google Scholar
Bishop, J.E.and Waldholz, M.(1990). Genome. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Blank, R.H.(1988). “The Challenge of Emerging Public Policy Issues in Genetic Counseling.” In National Society for Genetic Counselors, Strategies in Genetic Counseling: The Challenge of the Future. New York: Human Sciences Press.Google Scholar
Blank, R.H., Caldwell, L.K., Wiegele, T.C., and Zilinskas, R.A.(1987). “Biotechnology, Public Policy, and the Social Sciences: Critical Needs in Teaching and Research.” Politics and the Life Sciences 6:64–80.Google Scholar
Caldwell, L.K.(1964). “Biopolitics: Sciences, Ethics and Public Policy.” The Yale Review 54:1–16.Google Scholar
Cantor, C.R.(1990). “Orchestrating the Human Genome Project.” Science 248:49–51.Google Scholar
Ciba Foundation (1990). Human Genetic Information: Science, Law and Ethics. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Davis, J.(1990). Mapping the Code: The Human Genome Project and the Choices of Modern Science. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Duster, T.(1990). Backdoor to Eugenics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Holden, C.(1982). “Looking at Genes in the Workplace.” Science 217:336–337.Google Scholar
Holden, C.(1991). “Probing the Complex Genetics of Alcoholism.” Science 251:163–164.Google Scholar
Lappe, M.(1987). “The Limits of Genetic Inquiry.” Hastings Center Report 17:5–10.Google Scholar
Marx, J.L.(1989). “The Cystic Fibrosis Gene is Found.” Science 245:923–925.Google Scholar
McKusick, V.A.(1989). “Mapping and Sequencing the Human Genome.” New England Journal of Medicine 320:910–915.Google Scholar
Merz, B.(1989). “Gene Therapy Enters ‘Second Generation.’” American Medical News, December 22/29:3,11.Google Scholar
National Center for Human Genome Research (NCHGR) (1990). Understanding our Genetic Heritage: The U.S. Human Genome Project: The First Five Years. Springfield, VA: National Technical Information Service.Google Scholar
Nelkin, D.and Tancredi, L.(1989). Dangerous Diagnostics: The Social Power of Biological Information. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Partington, M.W.(1986). “X-Linked Mental Retardation: Caveats in Genetic Counseling.” American Journal of Medical Genetics 23:101–109.Google Scholar
Selden, R.F., Skoskiewicz, M.J., Russell, P.S., and Goodman, H.M.(1987). “Regulation of Insulin-Gene Expression: Implications for Gene Therapy.” New England Journal of Medicine 317:1067–1075.Google Scholar
Suzuki, D.and Knudtson, P.(1990). Genethics: The Ethics of Engineering Life. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Watson, J.D.(1990). “The Human Genome Project: Past, Present, and Future.” Science 248:44–48.Google Scholar