Hostname: page-component-669899f699-2mbcq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-25T10:50:40.174Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Political humor and reverse dominance hierarchies - Mark van Vugt and Anjana Ahuja, Naturally Selected: The Evolutionary Science of Leadership (New York: HarperCollins, 2011), 272 pages. ISBN 978-0061963834, Hardcover, $25.99.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2016

Patrick A. Stewart
Patrick A. Stewart*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of Arkansas, 428 Old Main, Fayetteville, AR 72701. [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Forum
Information
Politics and the Life Sciences , Volume 30 , Issue 1 , Spring 2011 , pp. 122 - 124
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Oring, Elliott, “Risky business: Political jokes under repressive regimes,” Western Folklore, 2004, 63(3): 209–236.Google Scholar
2. Rose, Alexander, “When politics is a laughing matter,” Policy Review, 2001: 11059–11071.Google Scholar
3. Boehm, Christopher, Hierarchy in the Forest: The Evolution of Egalitarian Behavior (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
4. Baumgartner, Jody C. and Morris, Jonathan S., “The Daily Show effect,” American Politics Research, 2006, 34(3): 341–367.Google Scholar
5. Jakobwitz, Sharon and Egan, Vincent, “The dark triad and normal personality traits,” Personality and Individual Differences, 2006, 40(2): 331–339.Google Scholar
6. Paulhus, Delroy L. and Williams, Kevin M., “The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy,” Journal of Research in Personality, 2002, 36(6): 556–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Veselka, Livia, Schermer, Julie A., Martin, Rod A., Cherkas, Lynn F., Spector, Tim D., and Vernon, Philip A., “A behavioral genetic study of relationships between humor styles and the six HEXACO personality factors,” Europe's Journal of Psychology, 2010: 33–39.Google Scholar
8. Martin, Rod A., Puhlik-Doris, Patricia, Larsen, Gwen, Gray, Jeanette, and Weir, Kelly, “Individual differences in uses of humor and their relation to psychological well-being: Development of the humor styles questionnaire,” Journal of Research in Personality, 2003, 37(1): 48–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Stillman, Tyler F., Baumeister, Roy F., and DeWall, C. N., “What's so funny about not having money? The effects of power on laughter,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2007, 33(11): 1547–1558.Google Scholar
10. Platow, Michael J., Haslam, S. A., Both, Amanda, Chew, Ivanne, Cuddon, Michelle, Goharpey, Nahal, Maurer, Jacqui, Rosini, Simone, Tsekouras, Anna, and Grace, Diana M., “‘It's not funny if they're laughing’: Self-categorization, social influence, and responses to canned laughter,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2005, 41(5): 542–550.Google Scholar