No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
On the prevalence of population groups in the human-genetics research literature
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 May 2016
Abstract
Background.
Population-specific human-genetics research has become commonplace but remains controversial, as its results can affect public and personal perceptions of the ethnic, national, and racial groups studied. Choice of populations for study has generally seemed a function of scientific, logistical, or economic factors.
Research Question.
Has the identity of populations studied in the human-genetics research literature varied systematically, and, if it has, in what ways?
Methods.
I searched the PubMed database for population-genetics reports, calculating for each a population score, a genetics score, and a mutation score.
Results.
Some populations had been studied far more intensively than others. Many of the most frequently studied groups were ethnically defined and politically marginal in their home countries; some of these groups were involved in self-determination struggles. In the mutation-research literature, state-defined Muslim and Mediterranean populations prevailed.
Conclusion.
Study-population selection may in some cases be explained by, or may complicate, political predicament.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences
References
1.Berger, A., “Private company wins rights to Icelandic gene database,” British Medical Journal, Jan 2, 1999; 318(7175): 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.McInnis, M. G., “The assent of a nation: genethics and Iceland,” Clinical Genetics, April 1999; 55(4): 234–9.Google Scholar
3.Duncan, N., “World Medical Association opposes Icelandic gene database,” British Medical Journal, April 24, 1999; 318(7191): 1096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Merz, J. F., McGee, G. E., Sankar, P., “‘Iceland Inc.’?: On the ethics of commercial population genomics,” Social Science and Medicine, March 2004; 58(6): 1201–9.Google Scholar
5.Lippman, A., “Led (astray) by genetic maps: the cartography of the human genome and health care,” Social Science and Medicine, 1992, 35:1469–76.Google Scholar
6.Conrad, P., “Public eyes and private genes: historical frames, news constructions, and social problems,” Social Problems, 1997, 44:139–54.Google Scholar
7.Conrad, P., “A mirage of genes,” Sociology of Health and Illness, 1999, 21(2): 228–39.Google Scholar
8.Conrad, P., “Genetic optimism: framing genes and mental illness in the news.” Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry, June 2001, 25(2): 225–47.Google Scholar
9.Conrad, P.Gabe, J., “Introduction: sociological perspectives on the new genetics: an overview,” Sociology of Health and Illness, 1999, 21(5): 505–16.Google Scholar
10.Cunningham-Burley, S.Kerr, A., “Defining the ‘social’: towards an understanding of scientific and medical discourses on the social aspects of the new human genetics,” Sociology of Health and Illness, 1999, 21(5): 647–68.Google Scholar
11.Brodwin, P., “Genetics, identity, and the anthropology of essentialism,” Anthropological Quarterly, 2002, 75(2): 323–30.Google Scholar
12.Alper, J. S.Beckwith, J., “Genetic fatalism and social policy: the implications of behavior genetic research,” Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, 1993, 66:511–24.Google Scholar
13.Wolpe, P. R., “If I am only my genes, what am I? Genetic essentialism and a Jewish response,” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 1997, 7(1): 213–30.Google Scholar
14.Nelkin, D.Lindee, M. S., “Cloning in the popular imagination,” Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 1998, 7: 2, 145–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Lippman, A., “Led (astray) by genetic maps: the cartography of the human genome and health care,” Social Science and Medicine, 1992, 35:1469–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Turney, Jon, Frankenstein's Footsteps: Science, Genetics, and Popular Culture (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
17.Van Dijk, J., Imagenation: Popular Images of Genetics (London/New York: Macmillan, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Nelkin, D.Lindee, M. S., The DNA Mystique: The Gene as a Cultural Icon (New York: W. H. Freeman, 1995).Google Scholar
22.Burley, J., The Genetic Revolution and Human Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
24.Bradby, H., “Genetics and racism” in Marteau, T. and Richards, M., eds., The Troubled Helix: Social and Psychological Aspects of the New Human Genetics. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), pp. 295–316.Google Scholar
25.Dyson, S., “‘Race’, ethnicity, and haemoglobin disorders,” Social Science and Medicine, 1998, 47:121–31.Google Scholar
27.Rabinow, P., French DNA: Trouble in Purgatory (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999).Google Scholar
28.Bonfadelli, H., Dahinden, U., Leonarz, M., “Biotechnology in Switzerland: high on the public agenda, but only moderate support,” Public Understanding of Science, 2002, 11:113–30.Google Scholar
29.Gutteling, J. M., “Biotechnology in the Netherlands: controversy or consensus?” Public Understanding of Science, 2002, 11:131–42.Google Scholar
30.Office of Science and Technology and the Wellcome Trust, “Science and the public: a review of science communication and public attitudes toward science in Britain,” Public Understanding of Science, 2001, 10:315–30.Google Scholar
31.Miller, S., “Public understanding of science at the crossroads,” Public Understanding of Science, 2001, 10:115–20.Google Scholar
32.Robins, R., “Overburdening risk: policy frameworks and the public uptake of gene technology,” Public Understanding of Science, 2001, 10:19–36.Google Scholar
33.Harry, D., Shelton, B. L., Howard, S., Indigenous People, Genes and Genetics: What Indigenous People Should Know About Bio colonialism: A Primer and Resource Guide, 2000, <http://www.ipcb.org/pub/ipgg.html>, last accessed 2/10/02.,+last+accessed+2/10/02.>Google Scholar
34.Shelton, B. L., Consent and Consultation in Genetic Research on American Indians and Alaska Natives, 2002, <http://www.ipcb.org/pub/consent.htm>, last accessed 2/10/02.,+last+accessed+2/10/02.>Google Scholar
35.Whitt, L. A., 2000, <http://www.admin.mtu.edu/urel/breaking/2000/whitt.html>, last accessed 8/10/02.,+last+accessed+8/10/02.>Google Scholar
36.Nickens, H., “The Genome Project and health services for minority populations” in Murray, T. H., Rothstein, M. A., and Murray, R. F., eds., The Human Genome Project and the Future of Health Care (Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press, 1996), pp. 59–78.Google Scholar
37.Points to Consider When Planning a Genetic Study That Involves Members of Named Populations (Bethesda: National Insitutes of Health) <http://www.nih.gov/sigs/bioethics/named_populations.html>, last accessed 3/25/05.,+last+accessed+3/25/05.>Google Scholar
38.Beckwith, J.Alper, J. S., “Reconsidering genetic antidiscrimination legislation,” Journal of Law, Medicine, and Ethics, 1998, Fall 26(3): 205–10, 178.Google Scholar
39.The Communities of Color and Genetic Policy Project, <http://esa.un.org/unpp/p2k0data.asp>..>Google Scholar
40.Ethnicity, Race, Citizenship: Identity After the Human Genome Project (Program on Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications, The National Human Genome Research Institute), <http://www.genome.gov/10001848>, last accessed 3/25/05.,+last+accessed+3/25/05.>Google Scholar
41.Points to Consider When Planning a Genetic Study That Involves Members of Named Populations.Google Scholar
42.Arcos-Burgos, M.Muenke, M., “Genetics of population isolates,” Clinical Genetics, 2002, 61(4): 233–47.Google Scholar
43.Escamilla, M. A., “Population isolates: their special value for locating genes for bipolar disorder,” Bipolar Disorder, 2001, 3(6): 299–317.Google Scholar
47.Philipkoski, Kristen, “Iceland's genetic jackpot,” Wired News, 12/10/1999 <http://www.wired.com/news/print/0,1294,32904,00.html>.Google Scholar
49.World Population Prospects: The 2000 Revision Highlights (New York: United Nations Population Division, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 28 February 2001) <http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/wpp2000/annex-tables.pdf>..>Google Scholar
53.Marshall, E., “DNA studies challenge the meaning of race,” Science, 1998, 282:654–5.Google Scholar
55.Billings, P. R., et al., “Discrimination as a consequence of genetic testing,” American Journal of Human Genetics, March 1992, 50(3): 476–82.Google Scholar
56.Natowicz, M. R., Alper, J. K., Alper, J. S., “Genetic discrimination and the law,” American Journal of Human Genetics, 1992, 50:465–75.Google Scholar
57.Pascoe, Peggy, “Miscegenation law, court cases, and ideologies of ‘race’ in twentieth-century America” in Hodes, Martha, ed., Sex, Love, Race: Crossing Boundaries in North American History (New York: New York University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
58.Brodkin, K., How Jews Became White Folks, and What That Says About Race in America (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
60.Waldman, L., “No rainbow bus for us: building nationalism in South Africa” in Barnard, A. and Kenrich, J., eds., Africa's Indigenous Peoples (Edinburgh: Centre for African Studies, 2001).Google Scholar