No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Law and Monogamy: a Troubled Relationship
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 May 2016
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Roundtable Commentaries
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences
References
Bonfield, L. (1991). “Church Law and Family Law in Medieval Western Christendom.” Continuity and Change 6:361–74.Google Scholar
Brundage, J.A. (1987). Law, Sex, and Christian Society in Medieval Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Brundage, J.A. (1994). “Family Membership and Stability in Canon Law: Medieval Adoption.” Paper presented at the International Conference on Medieval Studies, University of Leeds.Google Scholar
Cod. Theod. (1905) = Codex Theodosianus. Edited by Kruger, P. and Mommsen, T.. Berlin: Weidmann.Google Scholar
Falcao, M. (1973). Las prohibiciones matrimoniales de caracter social en el imperio romano. Pamplona: EUNSA.Google Scholar
Gaudemet, J. (1955). “La décision de Callixte en matière de mariage.” In Studi in onore di Ugo Enrico Paoli. Florence: Le Monnier.Google Scholar
Gaudemet, J. (1989). L'église dans l'empire romain (IVe-Ve siècles). Second edition. Paris: Sirey.Google Scholar
Goody, J. (1983). The Development of the Family and Marriage in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKnight, J.M. (1985). “Legitimation and Adoption on the Anglo-Hispanic Frontier of the United States.” Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis 53:135–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheehan, M.M. (1991). “The European Family and Canon Law.” Continuity and Change 6:347–60.Google Scholar
Treggiari, S. (1991). Roman Marriage: Iusti Coniuges from the Time of Cicero to the Time of Ulpian. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar