No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Evolutionary ethics: An argument for “new wave” Aristotelianism
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 May 2016
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Harrison Symposium III
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences
References
1.Barash, David, “Evolutionary Existentialism, Sociobiology, and the Meaning of Life,” BioScience, 2000, 50(11):1012–1017; Ruse, Michael and Wilson, E. O., “Moral Philosophy as Applied Science,” Philosophy, 1986, 61:173–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Casebeer, William, Natural Ethical Facts: Evolution, Connectionism, and Moral Cognition (MIT Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Hume, David, A Treatise of Human Nature (Clarendon Press, [1739] 1985); Moore, G. E., Principia Ethica (Prometheus Books, [1902] 1988.)Google Scholar
4.Quine, W. V. O., From a Logical Point of View, second edition, revised (Harvard University Press, [1953] 1980; Dewey, John, “The Influence of Darwin on Philosophy and Other Essays in Contemporary Thought,” in Collected Works: The Middle Works, Volume 4 (Southern Illinois Press, [1909] 1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Allen, Colin, Bekoff, Mark, Lauder, George, eds., Nature's Purposes: Analyses of Function and Design in Biology (MIT Press, 1998).Google Scholar
6.Broadie, Sarah, Ethics with Aristotle (Oxford University Press, 1991); Aristotle, Nichomachean Ethics (Hackett, 1985).Google Scholar
7.Arnhart, Larry, Darwinian Natural Right: The Biological Ethics of Human Nature (State University of New York Press, 1998).Google Scholar
8.Casebeer, William, “The Neural Mechanisms of Moral Cognition,” Nature Reviews Neurosciences, 2003, 4(10): 841–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar