Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T00:22:09.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of disease salience and xenophobia on support for humanitarian aid

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2017

Johnathan C. Peterson ,
Frank J. Gonzalez  and
Stephen P. Schneider
Johnathan C. Peterson
Affiliation:
Palo Alto College
Frank J. Gonzalez*
Affiliation:
University of Arizona
Stephen P. Schneider
Affiliation:
University of Nebraska, Lincoln
*
Correspondence: Frank J. Gonzalez, School of Government and Public Policy, University of Arizona, Social Sciences Building, 1145 E. South Campus Dr., Tucson, AZ 85719. Email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

This article examines how disease salience influences attitudes toward two types of humanitarian aid: sending foreign aid and housing refugees. Some have argued that disease salience increases levels of out-group prejudice through what is referred to as the behavioral immune system (BIS), and this increase in out-group prejudice works to shape policy attitudes. However, an alternative mechanism that may explain the effects of disease salience is contamination fear, which would suggest there is no group bias in the effects of disease threat. Existing work largely interprets opposition to policies that assist out-groups as evidence of out-group prejudice. We suggest it is necessary to separate measures of out-group animosity from opinions toward specific policies to determine whether increased out-group prejudice rather than fear of contamination is the mechanism by which disease salience impacts policy attitudes. Across two experiments, disease salience is shown to significantly decrease support for humanitarian aid, but only in the form of refugee support. Furthermore, there is converging evidence to suggest that any influence of disease salience on aid attitudes is not caused by a corresponding increase in xenophobia. We suggest that the mechanism by which disease threat influences policy attitudes is a general fear of contamination rather than xenophobia. These findings go against an important hypothesized mechanism of the BIS and have critical implications for the relationship between disease salience and attitudes toward transnational policies involving humanitarian aid.

Keywords

Disease saliencexenophobiahumanitarian aidout-group prejudicebehavioral immune system
Type
Articles
Information
Politics and the Life Sciences , Volume 36 , Issue 2 , Fall 2017 , pp. 17 - 36
Copyright
© Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

McNeil, D. G. Jr., “Ebola response in Liberia is hampered by infighting,” New York Times, November 20, 2014, p. A1.Google Scholar
Gronke, P., “The politics and policy of Ebola,” PS: Political Science & Politics , 2015, 48(1): 3–18.Google Scholar
Schaller, M. and Park, J. H., “The behavioral immune system (and why it matters),” Current Directions in Psychological Science , 2011, 20(2): 99–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faulkner, J., Schaller, M., Park, J. H., and Duncan, L. A., “Evolved disease-avoidance mechanisms and contemporary xenophobic attitudes,” Group Processes & Intergroup Relations , 2004, 7(4): 333–353.Google Scholar
Navarrete, C. D. and Fessler, D. M. T., “Disease avoidance and ethnocentrism: The effects of disease vulnerability and disgust sensitivity on intergroup attitudes,” Evolution and Human Behavior , 2006, 27(4): 270–282.Google Scholar
Schaller, M. and Duncan, L. A., “The behavioral immune system: Its evolution and social psychological implications,” in Evolution and the Social Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and Social Cognition, Forgas, Joseph P., Haselton, Martie G., and von Hippel, William, eds. (New York: Psychology Press, 2007), pp. 293–307.Google Scholar
Schaller, M., “The behavioural immune system and the psychology of human sociality,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences , 2011, 366(1583): 3418–3426.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schaller, pp. 3418–3426.Google Scholar
Fincher, C. L., Thornhill, R., Murray, D. R., and Schaller, M., “Pathogen prevalence predicts human cross-cultural variability in individualism/collectivism,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences , 2008, 275(1640): 1279–1285.Google Scholar
Terrizzi, J. A., Shook, N. J., and McDaniel, M. A., “The behavioral immune system and social conservatism: a meta-analysis,” Evolution and Human Behavior , 2013, 34(2): 99–108.Google Scholar
Stürmer, S., Rohmann, A., Mazziotta, A., Siem, B., and Barbarino, M-L., “Fear of infection or justification of social exclusion? The symbolic exploitation of the Ebola epidemic,” Political Psychology , 2017, 38(3): 499–513.Google Scholar
Choma, B. L., Hodson, G., and Costello, K., “Intergroup disgust sensitivity as a predictor of islamophobia: The modulating effect of fear,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 2012, 48(2): 499–506.Google Scholar
Clifford, S. and Piston, S., “Explaining public support for counterproductive homelessness policy: The role of disgust,” Political Behavior , 2017, 39(2): 1–23.Google Scholar
Clifford, S. and Wendell, D. G., “How disgust influences health purity attitudes,” Political Behavior , 2016, 38(1): 1–24.Google Scholar
Kam, C. D. and Estes, B. A., “Disgust sensitivity and public demand for protection,” Journal of Politics , 2016, 78(2): 481–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, J. H., van Leeuwen, F., and Chochorelou, Y., “Disease-avoidance processes and stigmatization: Cues of substandard health arouse heightened discomfort with physical contact,” Journal of Social Psychology , 2013, 153(2): 212–228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aarøe, L., Osmundsen, M., and Petersen, M. B., “Distrust as a disease avoidance strategy: Individual differences in disgust sensitivity regulate generalized social trust,” Frontiers in Psychology , 2016, 7: 1843, doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01038.Google ScholarPubMed
Schaller, M. and Park, J. H., “The behavioral immune system (and why it matters),” Current Directions in Psychological Science , 2011, 20(2): 99–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clifford, S., Jewell, R. M., and Waggoner, P. D., “Are samples drawn from Mechanical Turk valid for research on political ideology?” Research & Politics , 2015, 2(4): 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berinsky, A. J., Huber, G. A., and Lenz, G. S., “Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk,” Political Analysis , 2012, 20(3): 351–368.Google Scholar
Wong, P. T. P., Recker, G. T., and Glaser, G., “Death attitude profile-revised: A multidimensional measure of attitudes toward death,” in Death Anxiety Handbook: Research, Instrumentation, and Application, Neimeyer, Robert A., ed. (Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis, 1994), pp. 121–148.Google Scholar
Haidt, J., McCauley, C., and Rozin, P., “Individual differences in sensitivity to disgust: A scale sampling seven domains of disgust elicitors,” Personality and Individual Differences , 1994, 16(5): 701–713.Google Scholar
Rohrmann, S., Hopp, H., and Quirin, M., “Gender differences in psychophysiological responses to disgust,” Journal of Psychophysiology , 2008, 22(2): 65–75.Google Scholar
Smith, K. B., Oxley, D., Hibbing, M. V., Alford, J. R., and Hibbing, J. R., “Disgust sensitivity and the neurophysiology of left–right political orientations,” PLOS ONE , 2011, 6(10): e25552.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Balzer, A. and Jacobs, C. M., “Gender and physiological effects in connecting disgust to political preferences,” Social Science Quarterly , 2011, 92(5): 1297–1313.Google Scholar
Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D., Iyer, R., and Haidt, J., “Disgust sensitivity, political conservatism, and voting,” Social Psychological and Personality Science , 2012, 3(5): 537–544.Google Scholar
Terrizzi, J. A., Shook, N. J., and Ventis, W. L., “Disgust: A predictor of social conservatism and prejudicial attitudes toward homosexuals,” Personality and Individual Differences , 2010, 49(6): 587–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imai, K., Keele, L., Tingley, D., and Yamamoto, T., “Unpacking the black box of causality: Learning about causal mechanisms from experimental and observational studies,” American Political Science Review , 2011, 105(4): 765–789.Google Scholar
Spencer, S. J., Zanna, M. P., and Fong, G. T., “Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 2005, 89(6): 845–851.Google Scholar
Stone-Romero, E. F. and Rosopa, P. J., “The relative validity of inferences about mediation as a function of research design characteristics,” Organizational Research Methods , 2008, 11(2): 326–352.Google Scholar
Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., and Schwartz, J. L. K., “Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 1998, 74(6): 1464–1480.Google Scholar
Pérez, E. O., Unspoken Politics: Implicit Attitudes and Political Thinking (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Dovidio, J. F. and Gaertner, S. L., “Aversive racism and selection decisions: 1989 and 1999,” Psychological Science , 2000, 11(4): 315–319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mendelberg, T., The Race Card: Campaign Strategy, Implicit Messages, and the Norm of Equality (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Gadarian, S. K., “The politics of threat: How terrorism news shapes foreign policy attitudes,” Journal of Politics , 2010, 72(2): 469–483.Google Scholar
Gadarian, S. K. and Albertson, B., “Anxiety, immigration, and the search for information,” Political Psychology , 2014, 35(2): 133–164.Google Scholar
Albertson, B. and Gadarian, S. K., Anxious Politics: Democratic Citizenship in a Threatening World (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Khasnis, A. A. and Nettleman, M. D., “Global warming and infectious disease,” Archives of Medical Research , 2005, 36(6): 689–696.Google Scholar
Ferwerda, J., Flynn, D. J., and Horiuchi, Y., “Explaining opposition to refugee resettlement: The role of NIMBYism and perceived threats,” Science Advances , 2017, 3(9): e1700812, doi:10.1126/sciadv.1700812.Google Scholar
Beall, A. T., Hofer, M. K., and Schaller, M., “Infections and elections: Did an Ebola outbreak influence the 2014 U.S. federal elections (and if so, how)?” Psychological Science , 2016, 27(5): 595–605.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Peterson supplementary material 1

Peterson supplementary material

Download Peterson supplementary material 1(File)
File 154.6 KB