No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Contemporary Ethical Analyses: A Shortfall in Scientific Knowledge
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 May 2016
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0730938400025211/resource/name/firstPage-S0730938400025211a.jpg)
- Type
- Roundtable Commentaries
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences
References
Bacchetta, M.D. and Richter, G. (1996). “Dimensions and Classification of Genetic Interventions in the Human Genome.” A Response to “Germ-line Therapy to Cure Mitochondrial Disease: Protocol and Ethics of In Vitro Ovum Nuclear Transplantation” by Rubenstein, D. S. et al. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 5:450–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, F.G., Fins, J.J., and Bacchetta, M.D. (1996). “Clinical Pragmatism: John Dewey and Clinical Ethics.” The Journal of Contemporary Health Law and Policy 13:27–51.Google Scholar
Rubenstein, D.S., Thomasma, D.DC., Schon, E.A., and Zinaman, M.J. (1995). “Germ-Line Therapy to Cure Mitochondrial Disease: Protocol and Ethics of Invitro Ovum Nuclear Transplantation.” Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 4:316–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar