We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Christopher D. Johnston, Howard G. Lavine, and Christopher M. Federico, Open versus Closed: Personality, Identity, and the Politics of Redistribution (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017), 282 pages. ISBN: 9781107546424. Paperback $29.99.
Published online by Cambridge University Press:
16 May 2019
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
1
Sears, D. O., “College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on psychology’s view of human nature,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 51(3): 515–530.Google Scholar
2
Krupnikov, Y. and Levine, A. S., “Cross-sample comparisons and external validity,” Journal of Experimental Political Science, 2014, 1(1): 59–80.Google Scholar
3
Druckman, J. N. and Kam, C. D., “Students as experimental participants: A defense of the ‘narrow data base’,” in Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science, Druckman, J. N., Green, D., Kuklinski, J. H., and Lupia, A., eds. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 41–57.Google Scholar
4
Tesler, M., Post-Racial or Most-Racial? Race and Politics in the Obama Era (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2016).Google Scholar