No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Beyond Darwin, Hymenoptera, and Survival: A Review of Sociobiology and Human Politics
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 May 2016
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0730938400000289/resource/name/firstPage-S0730938400000289a.jpg)
- Type
- Book Reviews
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences
References
Adorno, T., Frenkl–Brunswik, E., Levinson, D.J., and Sanford, R.N. (1950). The Authoritarian Personality. N.Y.: Harper.Google Scholar
Aristotle (ca. 325 B.C., 1926) The Nicomachean Ethics. Translated by Rackham, H.Loeb Classical Library, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, pp. 471–482. Reprinted in J.C. Davies (ed.), When Men Revolt and Why. N.Y.: The Free Press, pp. 89–91.Google Scholar
Davies, J.C., (1969a). “The Psychobiology of Political Behavior: Some Provocative Developments.” Paper presented at the meeting of the Western Political Science Association, Honolulu.Google Scholar
Davies, J.C., (1969b), “The Forebrain, the Midbrain, and Political Violence.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Davies, J.C., (1970), Violence and Aggression: Innate or Not? Western Political Quarterly 23:611–623.Google Scholar
Davies, J.C., (1971). “Biology, Darwinism, and Political Science: Some New and Old Frontiers.” Paper presented at the meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Davies, J.C., (1975). “Biology and Politics: Wine and Wineskins, Old and New.” Paper presented at the meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago. “As I look at the growing variety of linkages between biology and political science, those that are most promising … lie in physiological research” (page 13, with following discussion, 13–16).Google Scholar
Davies, J.C., (1973). “Aggression, Violence, Revolution, and War.” In Knutson, J.N. (ed.), Handbook of Political Psychology. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, pp. 234–260.Google Scholar
Davies, J.C., (1976). “Ions of Emotion and Political Behavior: A Prototheory.” In Somit, A. (ed.), Biology and Politics. The Hague: Mouton, 97–126.Google Scholar
Davies, J.C., (1977). “Political Socialization: From Womb to Chidhood.” In Renshon, S.A., (ed.), Handbook of Political Socialization. N.Y.: The Free Press, pp. 142–171.Google Scholar
Davies, J.C., (1980). “Biological Perspectives on Human Conflict.” In Gurr, T.R. (ed.), Handbook of Political Conflict. N.Y.: The Free Press, pp. 19–68.Google Scholar
Eibl–Eibesfeldt, I. (1975, 1979), The Biology of Peace and War: Men, Animals, and Aggression. N.Y.: Viking.Google Scholar
Eibl–Eibesfeldt, I. (1979). “Human Ethology: Concepts and Implications for the Sciences of Man.” The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2:1–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Einstein, A., and Freud, S. (1932). Why War? Paris: International Institute of Intellectual Cooperation.Google Scholar
Pavlov, I. P. (1927). Conditioned Reflexes: An Investigation of the Physiological Activity of the Cerebral Cortex. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schubert, G. (1979a). “Ethology: A Primer for Political Scientists, Part II.” Notes 2 (April):3–4. DeKalb, III.: Center for Biopolitical Research.Google Scholar
Schubert, G. (1979b). Commentary on I. Eibl–Eibesfeldt, ‘Human Ethology: Concepts and Implications for the Science of Man.”’ The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2:1–57.Google Scholar
Scott, J. P. (1975a). “Violence and the Disaggregated Society.” Aggressive Behavior 1:235–260.3.0.CO;2-8>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sumner, W. G., and Keller, A. G. (1927). The Science of Society, vol. 1. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
White, Elliott, ed. (1981). Sociobiology and Human Politics. Lexington, Mass.: D. C. Heath.Google Scholar