No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Extract
If you give me six lines written by the hand of the most honest of men, I will find something in them which will hang birn.
—Armand Jean du Plessis, Cardinal Richelieu (1641)
- Type
- Articles and Commentaries
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences
References
Beauchamp, T.L. and Childress, J.F. (1979). Principles of Biomedical Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blank, R.H. (1984). Redefining Human Life: Reproductive Technologies and Social Policy. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Blank, R.H.(forthcoming). Maternal Responsibility for Fetal Development. Port Washington, N.Y.: Associated Faculty Press.Google Scholar
Caldwell, L.K. (1982). Science and the National Environmental Policy Act: Redirecting Policy Through Procedural Reform. University, Ala.: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Caldwell, L.K. (1969). “Health and Homeostasis as Social Concepts: An Exploratory Essay.” Diversity and Stability in Ecological Systems 22: 206–223. Brookhaven Symposium in Biology.Google ScholarPubMed
“The Challenge of Sociobiology to Ethics and Theology” (1984). Series of articles. Zygon 12, June.Google Scholar
Childress, J.F. (1982). Who Should Decide? Paternalism in Health Care. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. (1871). The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: J. Murray; New York: D. Appleton.Google Scholar
Dror, Y. (1984). “Policymaking as Fuzzy Gambling.” Paper presented at Annual Meeting of American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Dunlap, R. (1980). “Paradigm Change in Social Science.” American Behavioral Scientist 24: 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emerson, A.E. (1954). “Dynamic Homeostasis: A Unifying Principle in Organic, Social, and Ethical Evolution.” Scientific Monthly 88: 67–85.Google Scholar
Gilman, S.C. (1985). “Political Theory and Degeneration: From Left to Right, From Up to Down.” In Gilman, S. and Chamberlin, T. (eds.), Degeneration. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Gilman, S.C., Simon, R., and Zegura, S. (1983). “Evolution, Ethics, and Equality.” In Carrough, M. and Blank, R. (eds.), Biological Differences and Social Equality. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Glacken, C.J. (1967). Traces on the Rhodian Shore: Nature and Culture in Western Thought from Ancient Times to the End of the Eighteenth Century. Los Angeles: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, S.J. (1977). Ontogeny and Phytogeny. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Graham, L.R. (1977). “Science and Values: The Eugenics Movement in Germany and Russia in the 1920's.” American Historical Review 82: 1133–1164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grayson, M.J. and Shepard, T.R. (1973). Disaster Lobby: Prophets of Ecological Doom and Other Absurdities. Chicago: Follett.Google Scholar
Kantrowitz, A. (1977). “The Science Court Experiment: Criticisms and Responses.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 33: 44–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, L.S. (1958). The Medical World of the 18th Century. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kinsey, A.C., Pomeroy, W.B. and Martin, C.E. (1953). Sexual Behavior in the Human Female. Philadelphia: Saunders.Google Scholar
Larson, E. (1984). “Why the Cockroach May Thrive Another 350 Million Years.” Wall Street Journal, May 14.Google Scholar
Lewontin, R.C. (1974). The Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Marsh, G.P. (1864). Man and Nature or, Physical Geography as Modified by Human Action. New York: Charles Scribner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, P.S., and Klein, R.G., eds. (1984). Quaternary Extinctions: A Prehistoric Revolution. Tucson, Ariz.: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Masters, R.D. (1978). “Jean Jacques is Alive and Well: Rousseau and Contemporary Sociobiology.” Daedalus.Google Scholar
Milbraith, L.W. (1984). Environmentalists: Vanguard for a New Society. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R.C. (1984). “Public Opinion and Environmental Politics in the 1970s and 1980s.” Environmental Policy in the 1980s: Reagan's New Agenda. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
Newman, H.H. (1921). Evolution, Genetics and Eugenics. Ch. XLII-XIIV. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Newman, H.H. (1925). Evolution, Genetics and Eugenics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Politics and the Life Sciences (1982—). DeKalb, Ill.: Association for Politics and the Life Sciences.Google Scholar
Riesman, D. (1938). Medicine in Modern Society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sayers, J. (1982). Biological Politics: Feminist and Antifeminist Perspectives. New York: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar
Schubert, G. (1981). “The Sociobiology of Political Behavior.” In White, E. (ed.), Sociobiology and Human Politics. Lexington, Mass.: D.C. Heath, ch. 7.Google Scholar
Schubert, G.(forthcoming). “Scientific Creation and the Evolution of Religious Behavior.” Journal of Social and Biological Structures.Google Scholar
Scriven, M. (1959). “Explanation and Prediction in Evolutionary Theory.” Science.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepard, P. (1978). Thinking Animals: Animals and the Development of Human Intelligence. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Simon, J.L. (1981). The Ultimate Resource. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Somit, A., Peterson, S.A., Richardson, W.D., and Goldfischer, D.S. (1980) The Literature of Biopolitics, 2nd ed.DeKalb, Ill.: Program for Biosocial Research, Northern Illinois University.Google Scholar
Stone, C.D. (1974a) Should Trees Have Standing: Toward Legal Rights for Natural Objects. Los Altos, Calif.: W. Kaufmann.Google Scholar
Stone, C.D. (1974b). “Should Trees Have Standing: Toward Legal Rights for Natural Objects.” Southern California Law Review 45: 450–501.Google Scholar
Task Force of Presidential Advisory Group on Anticipated Advances in Science and Technology (1976a). Proceeding of the Colloquium on the Science Court PB 261305. Leesburg, Va.: National Technical Information Center.Google Scholar
Task Force of Presidential Advisory Group on Anticipated Advances in Science and Technology (1976b). “The Science Court Experiment: An Interim Report.” Science 193: 652–656, August 30.Google Scholar
Taylor, P.W. (1981). “The Ethics of Respect for Nature.” Environmental Ethics 3: 197–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, P.W. (1983). “In Defense of Biocentrism.” Environmental Ethics 5: 237–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wasby, S.L. (1976). Continuity and Change: From the Warren Court to the Burger Court. Pacific Palisades, Calif.: Goodyear Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Wiegele, T.C., ed. (1982). Biology and the Social Sciences: An Emerging Revolution. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Williams, G.C. (1966). Adaptation and Natural Selection: A Critique of Some Current Evolutionary Thought. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, R.J. (1953). Free and Unequal: The Biological Basis of Individual Liberty. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Williams, R.J. (1963). Biological Individuality: The Basis for the Genotrophic Concept. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar