Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T03:04:23.610Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Westermarck's altruism: Charity releasers, moral emotions, and the welfare ethic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2016

Frank Salter
Frank Salter*
Affiliation:
Human Ethology Research Group Max Planck Society Von-der-Tann-Str. 3 82346 Andechs Germany [email protected] Department of Anthropology 270 South 1400 East University of Utah Salt Lake City, Utah 84112-0060 USA
Get access

Abstract

The ethologically oriented method of social analysis developed by Edward Westermarck is applied to the subjects of charitable behavior, the welfare ethic, and the link between them. Westermarck dealt with these topics, but not in the depth he accorded the subjects of incest aversion, the incest prohibition, and the connection between them. Westermarck's approach to analyzing incest behavior and regulating institutions is also useful in the case of charitableness and the welfare ethic. Westermarck would have analyzed the welfare ethic as an institution derived from human nature — secundam naturam — in addition to an authoritative discipliner of behavior as proposed by Freud. Evidence is presented that this is the case with the welfare ethic in modern societies. This evidence includes the sensitivity of welfare to ethnic diversity. The latter decreases public altruism, whether expressed as charitableness to beggars, national charities, or public goods. The parochial leaning of charity and the welfare ethic is allowed for by Westermarck's empirically grounded ethics. Despite the passage of nearly a century, Edward Westermarck can still be an instructive guide to the biosociological enterprise. This continuing relevance shows what could have been, and can still be, done with the conceptual tools offered by an evolutionarily informed sociology.

Type
Research Article
Information
Politics and the Life Sciences , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , September 2008 , pp. 28 - 46
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I., Human Ethology (New York: Aldine de Gruyter, 1989).Google Scholar
2. Lorenz, K., “On the Concept of Instinctive Action,” Mellor, C. J. and Gove, D., trans., in Foundations of Comparative Ethology, Burghardt, G. M., ed. (New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1985), pp. 405–432.Google Scholar
3. Eibl-Eibesfeldt, , Human Ethology.Google Scholar
4. Darwin, C., The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals (London: Murray, 1872).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Esping-Andersen, G., The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
6. Trivers, R. L., “The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism,” Quarterly Review of Biology 1971, 14:35–57.Google Scholar
7. Welfare rhetoric also deploys concepts of fairness and reciprocity, but this aspect is not the subject of this article.Google Scholar
8. Westermarck, E. A., The Origin and Development of the Moral Ideas, Volume 2, 2nd ed. (1912; repr., New York: Johnson Reprint Corporation, 1971), p. 739.Google Scholar
9. Westermarck, E. A., The Future of Marriage in Western Civilization (1936; repr., Freeport, NY: Books for Libraries Press, 1970), p. 257.Google Scholar
10. Wolf, A. P., “Westermarck Redivivus,” Annual Review of Anthropology 1993, 22:157–175.Google Scholar
11. Eibl-Eibesfeldt, , Human Ethology, p. 707.Google Scholar
12. Stroup, T., “Introduction,” in Edward Westermarck: Essays on His Life and Works, Volume 34, Stroup, T., ed. (Helsinki: Acta Philosophica Fennica, 1982), p. x.Google Scholar
13. Westermarck, , Moral Ideas, Volume I.Google Scholar
14. Darwin, C., Expression of the Emotions.Google Scholar
15. Ibid., p. 529.Google Scholar
16. Ibid., p. 538.Google Scholar
17. Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I., Love and Hate: The Natural History of Behavior Patterns, Strachan, G., trans. (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1972).Google Scholar
18. Grammer, K., Signale der Liebe. Die biologischen Gestze der Partnerschaft (Hamburg: Hoffman und Campe, 1993).Google Scholar
19. Schiefenhövel, W., “Universals in Interpersonal Interactions,” in Nonverbal Communication. Where Nature Meets Culture, Segerstråle, U. and Molnár, P., eds. (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1997), pp. 61–79.Google Scholar
20. Hamilton, W. D., “The Genetic Evolution of Social Behavior, parts 1 and 2,” Journal of Theoretical Biology 1964, 7:1–51.Google Scholar
21. Trivers, R. L., “Parental Investment and Sexual Selection,” in Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man: 1871–1971, Campbell, B., ed. (Chicago: Aldine, 1972), pp. 136–179.Google Scholar
22. Alexander, R. D., Darwinism and Human Affairs (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1979).Google Scholar
23. Daly, M. and Wilson, M., Sex, Evolution and Behavior, 2nd ed. (Boston: PWS Publishers, 1983).Google Scholar
24. Westermarck, , Moral Ideas, Volume I, p. 538.Google Scholar
25. Ibid., p. 546.Google Scholar
26. Ibid., pp. 559–560.Google Scholar
27. Wiessner, P., “Risk, Reciprocity and Social Influences on !Kung San Economics,” in Politics and History in Band Societies, Leacock, E. and Lee, R., eds. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982), pp. 61–84.Google Scholar
28. Wiessner, P., “Taking the Risk out of Risky Transactions: A Forager's Dilemma,” in Risky Transactions: Kinship, Ethnicity, and Trust, Salter, E. K., ed. (New York: Berghahn, 2002), pp. 21–43.Google Scholar
29. Trivers, , “Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism.”Google Scholar
30. Butovskaya, M., Salter, F., Diakonov, I., and Smirnov, A., “Urban Begging and Ethnic Nepotism in Russia: An Ethological Pilot Study,” Human Nature 2000, 11(2): 157–182.Google Scholar
31. Salter, F. K., “The Welfare State versus Ethnic Pluralism: Ethological Theory, Research Program, and Invitation to Collaborate,” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the European Sociobiology Society, Russian State University for Humanities, Institute of Cultural Anthropology, Moscow, 31 May to 4 June 1998.Google Scholar
32. Salter, F. K., “Introduction: The Symposium Target Paper in Broader Context,” in Welfare, Ethnicity, and Altruism. New Data and Evolutionary Theory, Salter, F. K., ed. (London: Frank Cass, 2004), pp. 3–24.Google Scholar
33. Eibl-Eibesfeldt, , Human Ethology.Google Scholar
34. Westermarck, , Future of Marriage, pp. 164–167.Google Scholar
35. Spencer, H., The Principles of Psychology, 1890, quoted by Westermarck, Future of Marriage, pp. 164–165. (London: Press, 1890), p. 623.Google Scholar
36. Westermarck, , Future of Marriage, pp. 164–166.Google Scholar
37. Lorenz, K., “Die angeborenen Formen Möglicher Erfahrung,” Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 1943, 5:235–409.Google Scholar
38. Eibl-Eibesfeldt, , Love and Hate.Google Scholar
39. Westermarck, , Future of Marriage, pp. 164–166.Google Scholar
40. Eibl-Eibesfeldt, , Love and Hate.Google Scholar
41. Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I., “Warfare, Man's Indoctrinability and Group Selection,” Ethology (Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie), 1982, 60:177–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
42. Lorenz, K., “The Fashionable Fallacy of Dispensing with Description,” Naturwissenschaften 1973, 60:1–9.Google Scholar
43. Salter, F. K., “The Welfare State versus Ethnic Pluralism.”Google Scholar
44. Butovskaya, M., et al., “Urban Begging and Ethnic Nepotism.”Google Scholar
45. Lockard, J. S., McDonald, L. L., Clifford, D. A., and Martinez, R., “Panhandling: Sharing of Resources,” Science 30 January 1976, 191:406–408.Google Scholar
46. Lockard, J. S., “Studies of Human Social Signals: Theory, Methods and Data,” in The Evolution of Human Social Behavior, Lockard, J. S., ed. (New York: Elsevier, 1980), pp. 1–30.Google Scholar
47. Bischof-Köhler, D., Spiegelbild und Empathie: Die Anfänge der sozialen Kognition (Bern: Hans Huber, 1989).Google Scholar
48. Eibl-Eibesfeldt, , Human Ethology, p. 701.Google Scholar
49. Westermarck, , Future of Marriage, p. 166.Google Scholar
50. Rushton, J. P., “Genetic similarity, human altruism, and group selection,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1989, 12:503–559.Google Scholar
51. van den Berghe, P. L., The Ethnic Phenomenon (New York: Elsevier, 1981).Google Scholar
52. Butovskaya, M., et al., “Urban Begging and Ethnic Nepotism.”Google Scholar
53. Eibl-Eibesfeldt, , Human Ethology.Google Scholar
54. Walzer, M., “What Does It Mean to Be an ‘American’?” in What It Means to Be an American, Walzer, M., ed. (New York: Marsilio, 1992), pp. 23–49, 82.Google Scholar
55. Walzer, M., Spheres of Justice (New York: Basic Books, 1983).Google Scholar
56. Miller, D., On Nationality (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
57. Butovskaya, et al., “Urban Begging and Ethnic Nepotism,” p. 177.Google Scholar
58. Garner, H., “Beggars in New York,” in True Stories: Selected Non-fiction (Melbourne: Text Publishing, 1996), pp. 213–214.Google Scholar
59. Darwin, C., Voyage of the Beagle (1839; New York: Bantam Books, 1972), p. 433.Google Scholar
60. Solow, R. M., “Guess Who Pays for Workfare?” New York Review of Books 5 November 1998, 45(17):37.Google Scholar
61. Gould, S. J., “Introduction,” The Mismeasure of Man, 2nd ed. (New York: Norton. 1996).Google Scholar
62. Roberts, Paul C., Business Week, 11 November 1996, p. 12.Google Scholar
63. Reuther, W.quoted inTime magazine, 7 December 1998, p. 100.Google Scholar
64. Leone, R. C., “Supporting Retirees II: Stick with Public Pensions,” Foreign Affairs 1997, 76(4):53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
65. Acts 20:35. Authorized King James versionGoogle Scholar
66. Eibl-Eibesfeldt, , Human Ethology, pp. 706–707.Google Scholar
67. Bischof-Köhler, , Spiegelbild und Empathie.Google Scholar
68. Piaget, J., The Moral Judgement of the Child (London: Routledge, 1932).Google Scholar
69. Kohlberg, L., “Stage and Sequence: The Cognitive-Developmental Approach to Socialization,” in Handbook of Socialization Theory and Research, Goslin, D. A., ed. (Chicago: Rand McNally, 1969), pp. 347–480.Google Scholar
70. Cummins, D. D., “Evidence for the Innateness of Deontic Reasoning,” Mind and Language 1996, 11(2):160–190.Google Scholar
71. Chater, N. and Oaksford, M., “Deontic Reasoning, Modules and Innateness: A Second Look,” Mind and Language 1996, 11(2):191–202.Google Scholar
72. O'Neill, P. and Petrinovich, L., “A Preliminary Cross-Cultural Study of Moral Intuitions,” Evolution and Human Ethology 1998, 19:349–367.Google Scholar
73. For example: Arnhart, L., “The New Darwinian Naturalism in Political Theory,” American Political Science Review 1995, 89(2):389–400; Wilson, J. Q., The Moral Sense (New York: Free Press, 1993).Google Scholar
74. Alexander, R. D., The Biology of Moral Systems (New York: Aldine de Gruyter, 1987).Google Scholar
75. Gibbard, A., “Moral Emotions,” chapter 7 in Wise Choices, Apt Feelings: A Theory of Normative Judgment (Oxford: Clarendon, 1990).Google Scholar
76. Westermarck, E. A., Ethical Relativity (London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner and Co., 1932), pp. 107–108.Google Scholar
77. Trivers, R. L., “Sociobiology and Politics,” in Sociobiology and Human Politics, White, E., ed. (Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1981), pp. 1–43.Google Scholar
78. Westermarck, , Future of Marriage, p. 257.Google Scholar
79. Hepper, P. G., ed., Kin Recognition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
80. Eibl-Eibesfeldt, , Love and Hate.Google Scholar
81. Johnson, G. R., “In the Name of the Fatherland: An Analysis of Kin Terms Usage in Patriotic Speech and Literature,” International Political Science Review 1987, 8:165–174.Google Scholar
82. Connor, W., “Beyond Reason: The Nature of the Ethnonational Bond,” Ethnic and Racial Studies 1993, 16(3):373–389.Google Scholar
83. Holper, J. J., “Kin Term Usage in The Federalist: Evolutionary Foundations of Publius's Rhetoric,” Politics and the Life Sciences 1996, 15(2):265–272.Google Scholar
84. Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I., “Us and the Others: The Familial Roots of Ethnonationalism,” in Indoctrinability, Ideology, and Warfare: Evolutionary Perspectives, Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. and Salter, F. K., eds. (New York: Berghahn, 1998), pp. 21–53.Google Scholar
85. van den Berghe, , The Ethnic Phenomenon.Google Scholar
86. Westermarck, Especially, Moral Ideas, Volume 1, pp. 546–560.Google Scholar
87. Ibid., p. 556.Google Scholar
88. Ibid., p. 557.Google Scholar
89. Ibid., p. 558.Google Scholar
90. Ibid., p. 559.Google Scholar
91. Hardin, G., The Limits of Altruism: An Ecologist's View of Survival (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1977).Google Scholar
92. Westermarck, , Moral Ideas, Volume 1, pp. 548–549.Google Scholar
93. Freeman, G. P., “Migration and the Political Economy of the Welfare State,” The Annals of the American Academy (AAPSS) 1986, 485 (May):51–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
94. Faist, T., “Ethnicization and Racialization of Welfare-State Politics in Germany and the USA,” Ethnic and Racial Studies 1995, 18(2): 219–250.Google Scholar
95. Ibid., p. 245.Google Scholar
96. Gilens, M., “‘Race Coding’ and White Opposition to Welfare,” American Political Science Review 1996, 90(3):593–604.Google Scholar
97. Alesina, A., Baqir, R., and Easterly, W., “Public Goods and Ethnic Divisions,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 1999, 114 (November):1243–1284.Google Scholar
98. Brown, R. D., “Party Cleavages and Welfare Effort in the American States,” American Political Science Review 1995, 89(1):23–33.Google Scholar
99. Hero, R. E. and Tolbert, C. J., “A Racial/Ethnic Diversity Interpretation of Politics and Policy in the States of the U.S.,” American Journal of Political Science 1996, 40(3):851–871.Google Scholar
100. Schubert, J. and Tweed, M., “Ethnic Diversity, Population Size and Charitable Giving at the Local Level in the United States,” in Welfare, Ethnicity, and Altruism. New Data and Evolutionary Theory, Salter, F. K., ed. (London: Frank Cass, 2004), pp. 53–73.Google Scholar
101. Masters, R. D., “Why Welfare States Rise — and Fall: Ethnicity, Belief Systems, and Environmental Influences on the Support for Public Goods,” in Welfare, Ethnicity, and Altruism. New Data and Evolutionary Theory, Salter, F. K., ed. (London: Frank Cass, 2004), pp. 248–280.Google Scholar
102. Sanderson, S., “Ethnic Heterogeneity and Public Spending: Testing the Evolutionary Theory of Ethnicity with Cross-National Data,” in Welfare, Ethnicity, and Altruism. New Data and Evolutionary Theory, Salter, F. K., ed. (London: Frank Cass, 2004), pp. 74–87.Google Scholar
103. Vanhanen, T., “An Exploratory Comparative Study of the Relationship between Ethnic Heterogeneity and Welfare Politics,” in Welfare, Ethnicity, and Altruism. New Data and Evolutionary Theory, Salter, F. K., ed. (London: Frank Cass, 2004), pp. 88–118.Google Scholar
104. Sanderson, S. and Vanhanen, T., “Reconciling the Differences between Sanderson's and Vanhanen's Results,” in Welfare, Ethnicity, and Altruism. New Data and Evolutionary Theory, Salter, F. K., ed. (London: Frank Cass, 2004), pp. 119–120.Google Scholar
105. Easterly, W. and Levine, R., “Africa's Growth Tragedy: Policies and Ethnic Divisions,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 1997, 112 (November):1203–1250.Google Scholar
106. Masters, W. and McMillan, M., “Ethnolinguistic Diversity, Government, and Growth,” in Welfare, Ethnicity, and Altruism. New Data and Evolutionary Theory, Salter, F. K., ed. (London: Frank Cass, 2004), pp. 123–147.Google Scholar
107. Banfield, E. C., The Moral Basis of a Backward Society (New York: Free Press, 1967).Google Scholar
108. Wiessner, P., “The Impact of Tribalism on the Post-colonial State” (Unpublished manuscript, Department of Anthropology, University of Utah, 2006).Google Scholar
109. Esping-Andersen, , Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism.Google Scholar
110. Darwin, C., The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex (1871; London: Murray, 1913), p. 203.Google Scholar
111. Rawls, J., A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971).Google Scholar
112. Barry, B., “Nationalism, Intervention and Redistribution,” (working paper 3/96, Insitut für Interkulturelle und Internationale Studien [INIIS], Universität Bremen, 1996).Google Scholar
113. Walzer, , Spheres of Justice.Google Scholar
114. Walzer, , “What Does It Mean to Be an ‘American’?”Google Scholar
115. Miller, D., On Nationality.Google Scholar
116. O'Leary, B., “On the Nature of Nationalism: An Appraisal of Ernest Gellner's Writings on Nationalism,” British Journal of Political Science 1997, 27:191–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
117. Walzer, M., “Notes on the New Tribalism,” in Political Restructuring in Europe: Ethical Perspectives, Brown, C., ed. (London: Routledge, 1994), pp. 199–200.Google Scholar
118. Rawls, J., A Theory of Justice.Google Scholar
119. Huxley, T. H., Evolution and Ethics and Other Essays (New York: Appleton, 1894).Google Scholar
120. Williams, G. C., “Huxley's Evolution and Ethics in Sociobiological Perspective,” Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 1988, 23:383–407.Google Scholar
121. Salter, F. K., On enetic nterests: Family, Ethnicity, and Humanity in an Age of Mass Migration (New York: Transaction, 2003).Google Scholar
122. Alexander, , Biology of Moral Systems.Google Scholar
123. Bouchard, T. J. J., “Genes, Environment, and Personality,” Science 17 June 1994, 264:1700–1701.Google Scholar
124. Rushton, J. P., Fulker, D. W., Neal, M. C., Nias, D. K. B., and Eysenck, H. J., “Altruism and Aggression: The Heritability of Individual Differences,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1986, 50:1192–1198.Google Scholar
125. Gibbard, , Wise Choices, Apt Feelings, p. 127.Google Scholar
126. Walzer, , “Notes on the New Tribalism,” p. 200.Google Scholar
127. I Cor. 13:1. Authorized King James versionGoogle Scholar
128. Matt. 19:21. Authorized King James versionGoogle Scholar
129. Alexander, , Darwinism and Human Affairs, pp. 134–136.Google Scholar
130. Lockard, J. S. and Paulhus, D. L., eds., Self-deception: An Adaptive Mechanism? (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1988).Google Scholar
131. Westermarck, , Ethical Relativity, p. 106.Google Scholar
132. Westermarck, , Moral Ideas, Volume II, p. 739.Google Scholar
133. Esping-Andersen, , Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism.Google Scholar
134. Tiger, L., “Notions of Nature, Culture, and the Sources of Indoctrinability,” in Indoctrinability, Ideology, and Warfare: Evolutionary Perspectives, Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. and Salter, F. K., eds. (New York: Berghahn, 1998), pp. 97–106.Google Scholar
135. Westermarck, , as quoted byWolf, A. P., Sexual Attraction and Childhood Association: A Chinese Brief for Edward Westermarck (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1995), p. 12.Google Scholar
136. Stroup, , “Introduction,” p. xvi.Google Scholar
137. Wilson, E. O., Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1998).Google Scholar
138. Wedekind, C., Seebeck, T., Bettens, F., and Paepke, A. J., “MHC-Dependent Mate Preferences in Humans,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Science 1995, 260, 245–249.Google Scholar