We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. (1973). Der Vorprogrammierte Mensch. Wien: Verlag Fritz Molden.Google Scholar
Grafen, A. (1985). “Hamilton's Rule O.K.” Nature318: 310–311.Google Scholar
Guillaume, I. (1985). “La biosociologie d'Espinas et la sociobiologie de Wilson, deux systèmes de pensée comparables.” In “Sciences Sociales et défi de la sociobiologie.” Revue Européenne Des Sciences Sociales (Genève)23 (69): 139–156.Google Scholar
Langaney, A. (1979). Le sexe et I'innovation. Paris: Editions du Seuil.Google Scholar
Lewontin, R. C. (1977). “Caricature of Darwinism.” Nature266: 283–284.Google Scholar
Lopreato, J. (1984). Human Nature and Biocultural Evolution. Boston: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Lorenz, K. (1965). Uber tierisches und menschliches Verhalten. München: R. Piper & Co Verlag.Google Scholar
Queller, D. C. (1985). “Kinship, Reciprocity and Synergism in the Evolution Of Social Behavior.” Nature318: 366–367.Google Scholar
Sahlins, M. (1977). The Use and Abuse of Biology: An Anthropological Critique of Sociobiology. London: Tavistock Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
Stebbins, G. L., and Ayala, F. J. (1985). “The Evolution of Darwinism.” Scientific American253 (1): 54–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanner, N. M. (1981). On Becoming Human. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar