Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T09:57:34.814Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Prospects and Problems of a Biological Approach to the Study of Formal Social Organization: A Review of Biology and Bureaucracy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2016

Warren D. TenHouten*
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology University of California Los Angeles, California 90024
Get access

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Comte, A. (1968). System of Positive Polity, Vols. I, II, and IV; originally published 1851, 1852, and 1854. London: George Bell & Sons.Google Scholar
Doktor, R. and Bloom, D. M. (1977). “Selective Lateralization of Cognitive Style Related to Occupation as Determined by EEG Alpha Asymmetry.” Psychophysiology 14 (July): 385387.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Durkheim, E., and Mauss, M. (1967). Primitive Classification. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 8188; originally published in 1903 as “De quelques formes primitives de classification: contribution à l'étude des représentations collectives.” Année Sociologique 6 (1901–1902, Paris): 1–72.Google Scholar
Hamilton, W. D. (1964a, 1964b). “The Genetic Evolution of Social Behaviour. I, II.” Journal of Theoretical Biology 7 (07): 116, 17-52.Google Scholar
Mintzberg, H. (1976). “Planning on the Left Side and Managing on the Right.” Harvard Business Review 54 (July-August): 4958.Google Scholar
Zopf, G. W. Jr. (1962). “Attitude and Context.” In von Foerster, H. and Zopf, G. W. Jr. (eds.), Principles of Self-Organization. New York: Pergamon, p. 340.Google Scholar