Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T01:28:09.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Human Embryos and Genetic Testing: A Private Policy Model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2016

Andrea L. Bonnicksen
Andrea L. Bonnicksen*
Affiliation:
Northern Illinois University
Get access

Abstract

The practice of medicine, which traditionally falls outside the sphere of substantive governmental control, poses challenges to political scientists who perceive the need for oversight regarding problematic new technologies. The challenge is even greater when the technologies involve reproduction, in which constitutional liberties are at stake. This article suggests a private policy model for overseeing one problematic emerging reproductive technology—the diagnosis of chromosomal and genetic disorders in human embryos. It bids political scientists to examine and recommend creative private sector policies appropriate to biomedicine. Rules developed in the private sector, if regarded as obligatory by clinicians, offer a theoretically interesting bridge between voluntary ethical principles and mandatory public sector rules.

Type
Articles
Information
Politics and the Life Sciences , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , February 1992 , pp. 53 - 62
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, W.F.(1990). “Genetics and Human Malleability.” Hastings Center Report 20:21–24.Google Scholar
Beauchamp, T.L.and Childress, J.F.(1983). Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 2d ed.New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bolton, V., Hawes, S.M., Taylor, C.T., and Parsons, J.H.(1989). “Development of Spare Human Preimplantation Embryos in Vitro: An Analysis of the Correlations Among Gross Morphology, Cleavage Rates, and Development to the Blastocyst.” Journal of In Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer 6:30–35.Google Scholar
Bonnicksen, A.L.(1989). In Vitro Fertilization: Building Policy From Laboratories to Legislatures. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Bonnicksen, A.L.(1991). “The Embryo as Patient: New Techniques, New Dilemmas.” In Humber, J.and Almeder, R., eds. Biomedical Ethics Reviews. Clifton, N.J.: The Humana Press.Google Scholar
Bonnicksen, A.L.and Blank, R.H.(1988). “The Government and In Vitro Fertilization (IVF): Views of IVF Directors.” Fertility and Sterility 49:396–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brumby, M.and Kasimba, P.(1987). “When is Cloning Lawful?” Journal of In Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer 4:198–204.Google Scholar
Callahan, D.(1990). What Kind of Life?: The Limits of Medical Progress. New York: Touchstone.Google Scholar
Capron, A.J.(1990). “Which Ills to Bear?: Reevaluating the ‘Threat’ of Modern Genetics.” Emory Law Journal 39:665–696.Google Scholar
Cardozo, B.N.(1956). The Paradoxes of Legal Science. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, J., Elsner, C., Kort, H., Malter, H., Massey, J., Mayer, M.P., and Wiemer, K.. (1990). “Impairment of the Hatching Process Following IVF in the Human and Improvement of Implantation by Assisting Hatching Using Micromanipulation.” Human Reproduction 5:7–13.Google Scholar
Cottrell, L.S. Jr.(1966). “The Interrelationships of Law and Social Science.” In Jones, H.W., ed. Law and the Social Role of Science. New York: Rockefeller University Press.Google Scholar
Cusine, D.J.(1990). “Experimentation: Some Legal Aspects.” In Dyson, A.and Harris, J., eds. Experiments on Embryos. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
De Braekeller, M.and Dao, T.-N.(1991). “Cytogenetic Studies in Male Infertility: A Review.” Human Reproduction 6:245–250.Google Scholar
DeCherney, A.H.(1989). “Assisted Reproduction: Registration Visa-Vis Regulation.” Fertility and Sterility 51:568–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denonn, L.E., ed. (1953). The Wit and Wisdom of Oliver Wendell Holmes, Father and Son. Boston: The Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Dokras, A., Sargent, I.L., Ross, C., Gardner, R.L., and Barlow, D.H.(1990). “Trophectoderm Biopsy in Human Blastocysts.” Human Reproduction 5:821–825.Google Scholar
Elias, S.and Annas, G.J.(1987). Reproductive Genetics and the Law. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers.Google Scholar
“Embryology Needs Rules, Not New Laws” (1983). Nature 302:735–736.Google Scholar
Ethics Advisory Board, Department of Health, Education, and Welfare (1979). Report and Conclusions: HEW Support of Research Involving Human In Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Ethics Committee of the American Fertility Society (1990). “Ethical Considerations of the New Reproductive Technologies.” Fertility and Sterility, Supplement 2, 53:1S–109S.Google Scholar
Ferguson, M.W.J.(1990). “Contemporary and Future Possibilities for Human Embryonic Manipulation.” In Dyson, A.and Harris, J., eds. Experiments on Embryos. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fleisher, L.D.(1987). “Wrongful Births: When Is There Liability for Prenatal Injury?” American Journal of Diseases of Children 141:1260–1265.Google Scholar
“Germ Cell Gene Panel.” (1991). Science 253:841.Google Scholar
Gordon, J.W., Grunfeld, L., and Garrisi, G.J.(1989). “Successful Microsurgical Removal of a Pronucleus From Tripronuclear Human Zygotes.” Fertility and Sterility 52:67–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, D.K., Handyside, A.H., Penketh, R.J.A., Winston, R.M.L., and Delhanty, J.D.A.(1991). “Fluorescent In-Situ Hybridization to Interphase Nuclei of Human Preimplantation Embryos With X and Y Chromosome Specific Probes.” Human Reproduction 6:101–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Handyside, A.H., Penketh, R.J.A., Winston, R.M.L., Pattinson, J.K., Delhanty, J.D.A., and Tuddenham, E.G.D.. (1989). “Biopsy of Human Preimplantation Embryos and Sexing By DNA Amplification.” Lancet i (8634):347–349.Google Scholar
Hardy, K., Martin, K.L., Leese, H.J., Winston, R.M.L., and Handyside, A.H.(1990). “Human Implantation Development in Vitro Is Not Adversely Affected by Biopsy at the 8-Cell Stage.” Human Reproduction 5:708–714.Google Scholar
Harrison, M.R.(1990). “The Fetus as Patient: Historical Perspective.” In Harrison, M.R., Golbus, M.S., and Filly, R.A., eds. The Unborn Patient: Prenatal Diagnosis and Treatment. 2nd ed.Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders.Google Scholar
Jackson, L.G., Wapner, R.J., Grebner, E.E., Barr, M.A., and Davis, G.H.(1990). “Fetal Diagnosis by Chorionic Villus Sampling.” In Filkins, K.and Russo, J.F., eds. Human Prenatal Diagnosis. 2nd ed.New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
Jonsen, A.R.(1990). The New Medicine and the Old Ethics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kola, I., Lacham, O., and Jansen, R.P.S.(1990). “Chromosomal Analysis of Human Oocytes Fertilized by Microinjection of Spermatozoa into the Perivitelline Space.” Human Reproduction 5:575–577.Google Scholar
Ma, S., Kalousek, D.K., and Zouves, C.(1990). “The Chromosomal Complements of Cleaved Human Embryos Resulting from In Vitro Fertilization.” Journal of In Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer 7:16–21.Google Scholar
Medical Research International (1991). “In Vitro Fertilization-Embryo Transfer (IVF-ET) in the United States: 1989 Results From the IVF-ET Registry.” Fertility and Sterility 55:14–23.Google Scholar
Morgan, D.and Lee, R.G.(1991). Blackstone's Guide to the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990. London: Blackstone Press.Google Scholar
National Institutes of Health (1986). “Points to Consider in the Design and Submission of Human Somatic-Cell Gene Therapy Protocols.” September 29, 1986. Reprinted inNichols, E. K., Human Gene Therapy Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Office of Technology Assessment (1988). Infertility: Medical and Social Choices. OTA-BA-358Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Orwell, G.(1986). “Politics and the English Language.” In The Norton Anthology of English Literature, 5th ed., Volume 2. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Pergament, E.(1990). “Preimplantation Diagnosis: A Patient Perspective.” Presented at the 5th International Congress on Early Fetal Diagnosis, Prague, Czechoslovakia.Google Scholar
Roberts, L.(1989). “Ethical Questions Haunt New Genetic Technologies.” Science 243:1134–1136.Google Scholar
Roberts, L.(1991). “FISHing Cuts the Angst in Amniocentesis.” Science 254:378–379.Google Scholar
Rust v. Sullivan, 114 L. Ed. 2d 233 (1991).Google Scholar
Sabatier, P.A.(1991). “Toward Better Theories of the Policy Process.” PS: Political Science and Politics 24:147–156.Google Scholar
Schindler, J.M.(1990). “Basic Developmental Genetics and Early Embryonic Development: What's All the Excitement About?” Journal of NIH Research 2:49–55.Google Scholar
Schroeder, O. Jr.(1972). The Dynamics of Technology: From Medicine and Law to Health and Justice. Cleveland: Law-Medicine Center.Google Scholar
Scott, R.(1986). “Experimenting and the New Biology: ‘A Consummation Devoutly to Be Wished.’” Law, Medicine and Health Care 14:123–128.Google Scholar
Strom, C.M., Milayera, S., Enriquez, G., and Verlinsky, Y.(1990). “DNA Analysis of Single Cells for Single Gene Diseases.” Abstracts of the First International Symposium on Preimplantation Genetics, Chicago.Google Scholar
Tarin, J.J., Gomez, E., and Pellicer, A.(1991). “Chromosomal Anomalies in Human Ooctyes in Vitro.” Fertility and Sterility 55:964–969.Google Scholar
U.S. General Accounting Office, Report to the Chairman, Subcommittee on Regulation, Business Opportunities and Energy, Committee on Small Business, House of Representatives (1989). Human Embryo Laboratories: Standards Favored to Ensure Quality. GAO/HRD-90-24.Google Scholar
United States v. University Hospital, 729 F. 2d 144 (1984).Google Scholar
Verlinsky, Y., Pergament, E., and Strom, C.(1990). “The Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis of Genetic Diseases.” Journal of In Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer 7:1–5.Google Scholar
Walters, L.(1987). “Ethics and New Reproductive Technologies.” Hastings Center Report 17:3S–9S.Google Scholar
Warnock, M.(1985). A Question of Life: The Warnock Report on Human Fertilisation and Embryology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wertz, D.and Fletcher, J.C., eds. (1989). Ethics and Human Genetics: A Cross-Cultural Perspective. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar