Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:26:24.820Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Donor Gametes and Embryos: Who Wants to Know What about Whom, and Why?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2016

Pia Broderick  and
Iain Walker
Pia Broderick*
Affiliation:
Murdoch University, Australia
Iain Walker
Affiliation:
Murdoch University, Australia
*
Correspondence may be addressed to School of Psychology, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA,6150, Australia (E-mail: [email protected] or [email protected]).
Get access

Abstract

Many treatments for infertility require the use of donated gametes or embryos. Arguments have been made that all parties involved (donors, recipients, and children) should have open access to information about one another. The present article reports a survey of attitudes of 77 donors and 327 recipients in the state of Western Australia. Donors and recipients endorsed a register of nonidentifying information, but were less keen on a register of identifying information. They believed that medical personnel should have access to such registers, and that donors and recipients (but not children) should have access to nonidentifying, but not identifying, information. Typically, the sort of information respondents wanted to access pertained to health status and physical characteristics. Overwhelmingly, both donors and recipients saw gamete and embryo donation as more like blood donation than like adoption.

Type
Articles
Information
Politics and the Life Sciences , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , March 2001 , pp. 29 - 42
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amuzu, B., Laxova, R., and Shapiro, S. (1990). “Pregnancy Outcome, Health of Children, and Family Adjustment after Donor Insemination.” Obstetrics and Gynecology 75:899–905.Google Scholar
Berger, D., Eisen, A., Shuber, J., and Doody, K.F. (1986). “Psychological Patterns in Donor Insemination Couples.” Canadian Journal of Psychiatry 31:818–23.Google Scholar
Bolton, V., Golombok, S., Cook, R., and Rust, J. (1991). “A Comparative Study of Attitudes towards Donor Insemination and Egg Donation in Recipients, Potential Donors and the Public.” Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynaecology 12:217–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandon, J. (1979). “Telling the AID Child.” Adoption and Fostering 95:13–14.Google Scholar
Brandon, J. and Warner, J. (1977). “AID and Adoption: Some Comparisons.” British Journal of Social Work 7:335–41.Google Scholar
Brewaeys, A., Ponjaert, I., Van Hall, E.V., and Golombok, S. (1997a). “Donor Insemination: Child Development and Family Functioning in Lesbian Mother Families.” Human Reproduction 12:1349–59.Google Scholar
Brewaeys, A., Ponjaert-Kristoffersen, I., Van Steirteghem, A.C., and Devroey, P. (1993). “Children from Anonymous Donors: An Inquiry into Homosexual and Heterosexual Parents' Attitudes.” Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynaecology 14:23–35.Google Scholar
Brewaeys, A. et al. (1995). “Lesbian Mothers Who Conceived after Donor Insemination: A Follow-Up Study.” Human Reproduction 10:2731–35.Google Scholar
Brewaeys, A. et al. (1997b). “Donor Insemination: Dutch Parents' Opinions about Confidentiality and Donor Anonymity and the Emotional Adjustment of Their Children.” Human Reproduction 12:1591–97.Google Scholar
Broderick, P. and Walker, I. (1995). “Information Access and Donated Gametes: How Much Do We Know about Who Wants to Know?” Human Reproduction 10:3338–41.Google Scholar
Broderick, P. and Walker, I. (1996a). “Gametes and Embryo Donation and Adoption: A Comparison.” Paper presented at the Australasian Human Development Conference, Perth, Western Australia, April.Google Scholar
Broderick, P. and Walker, I. (1996b). “Recipient Couples' Agreement on Information Access and Disclosure Following Use of Donated Gametes and Embryos.” Paper presented at the 52nd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine; Boston, Massachusetts, November.Google Scholar
Clayton, C.E. and Kovacs, G.T. (1982). “AID Offspring: Initial Follow-Up Study of 50 Couples.” Medical Journal of Australia 1:338–39.Google Scholar
Cook, R. and Golombok, S. (1995). “A Survey of Semen Donation; Phase II: The View of the Donors.” Human Reproduction 10:951–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, R., Golombok, S., Bish, A., and Murray, C. (1995). “Disclosure of Donor Insemination: Parental Attitudes.” American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 65:549–59.Google Scholar
Cook, R., Vatev, I., Michova, Z., and Golombok, S. (1997). “The European Study of Assisted Reproduction Families: A Comparison of Family Functioning and Child Development between Eastern and Western Europe.” Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynaecology 18:203–12.Google Scholar
Cooke, I.D. (1993). “Secrecy, Openness, and Dl in the UK.” Politics and the Life Sciences 12:178–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniels, K.R. (1987). “Semen Donors in New Zealand: Their Characteristics and Attitudes.” Clinical Reproduction and Fertility 5:177–90.Google Scholar
Daniels, K.R. (1988). “Artificial Insemination Using Donor Semen and the Issue of Secrecy: The Views of Donors and Recipient Couples.” Social Science and Medicine 27:377–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniels, K.R. (1989). “Semen Donors: Their Motivations and Attitudes to Their Offspring.” Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology 7:121–27.Google Scholar
Daniels, K.R. (1991). “Relationships between Semen Donors and Their Networks.” Australian Social Work 44:29–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniels, K.R. (1995). “Information Sharing in Donor Insemination: A Conflict of Rights and Needs.” Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 4:217–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniels, K.R., Curson, R., and Lewis, G.M. (1996a). “Families Formed as a Result of Donor Insemination: The Views of Semen Donors.” Child and Family Social Work 1:97–106.Google Scholar
Daniels, K.R., Curson, R., and Lewis, G.M. (1996b). “Semen Donor Recruitment: A Study of Donors in Two Clinics.” Human Reproduction 11:746–51.Google Scholar
Daniels, K.R., Ericsson, H.L., and Burn, I.P. (1996). “Families and Donor Insemination: The Views of Semen Donors.” Scandinavian Journal of Social Welfare 5:229–37.Google Scholar
Daniels, K.R., Lewis, G.M., and Curson, R. (1997). “Information Sharing in Semen Donation: The Views of Donors.” Social Science and Medicine 44:673–80.Google Scholar
Daniels, K.R. and Taylor, K. (1993). “Secrecy and Openness in Donor Insemination.” Politics and the Life Sciences 12:155–70.Google Scholar
Durna, E.M. et al. (1997). “Donor Insemination: Attitudes of Parents towards Disclosure.” Medical Journal of Australia 167:256–59.Google Scholar
Golombok, S., Cook, R., Bish, A., and Murray, C. (1995). “Families Created by the New Reproductive Technologies: Quality of Parenting and Social and Emotional Development of the Children.” Child Development 66:285–95.Google Scholar
Golombok, S. et al. (1996). “The European Study of Assisted Reproduction Families: Family Functioning and Child Development.” Human Reproduction 11:2324–31.Google Scholar
Handelsman, D.J. et al. (1985). “Psychological and Attitudinal Profiles in Donors for Artificial Insemination.” Fertility and Sterility 43:95–101.Google Scholar
Kirkland, A. et al. (1992). “Comparison of Attitudes of Donors and Recipients to Oocyte Donation.” Human Reproduction 7:355–57.Google Scholar
Klock, S.C. (1993). “Psychological Aspects of Donor Insemination.” Psychological Issues in Infertility 4:455–69.Google Scholar
Klock, S.C., Jacob, M.C., and Maier, D. (1994). “A Prospective Study of Donor Insemination Recipients: Secrecy, Privacy, and Disclosure.” Fertility and Sterility 62:477–84.Google Scholar
Klock, S.C., Jacob, M.C., and Maier, D. (1996). “A Comparison of Single and Married Recipients of Donor Insemination.” Human Reproduction 11:2554–57.Google Scholar
Klock, S.C. and Maier, D. (1991). “Psychological Factors Related to Donor Insemination.” Fertility and Sterility 56:489–95.Google Scholar
Kovacs, G.T., Clayton, C.E., and McGowan, P. (1983). “The Attitudes of Semen Donors.” Clinical Reproduction and Fertility 2:73–75.Google Scholar
Lauritzen, P. (1993). “Dl's Dirty Little Secret.” Politics and the Life Sciences 12:188–89.Google Scholar
Leiblum, S.R. and Aviv, A.L. (1997). “Disclosure Issues and Decisions of Couples Who Conceived via Donor Insemination.” Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynaecology 18:292–300.Google Scholar
Leiblum, S.R., Palmer, M.G., and Spector, I.P. (1995). “Non-Traditional Mothers: Single Heterosexual/Lesbian Women and Lesbian Couples Electing Motherhood via Donor Insemination.” Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynaecology 16:11–20.Google Scholar
Lui, S.C. et al. (1995). “A Survey of Semen Donor Attitudes.” Human Reproduction 10:234–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahlstedt, P.P. and Probasco, K.A. (1991). “Sperm Donors: Their Attitudes toward Providing Medical and Psychological Information for Recipient Couples and Donor Offspring.” Fertility and Sterility 56:747–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manuel, C., Chevret, M., and Czyba, J. (1980). “Handling the Secrecy by AID Couples.” In David, G. and Price, W. (eds.), Human Artificial Insemination and Semen Preservation. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
McWhinnie, A.M. (1993). “Doubts and Realities in Dl Family Relationships.” Politics and the Life Sciences 12:189–91.Google Scholar
Nachtigall, R.D. (1993). “Secrecy: An Unresolved Issue in the Practice of Donor Insemination.” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 168:1846–51.Google Scholar
Nachtigall, R.D., Becker, G., Quiroga, S.S., and Tschann, J.M. (1998). “The Disclosure Decision: Concerns and Issues of Parents of Children Conceived through Donor Insemination.” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 178:1165–70.Google Scholar
Nachtigall, R.D., Becker, G., and Wozny, M. (1992). “The Effects of Gender-Specific Diagnosis on Men's and Women's Response to Infertility.” Fertility and Sterility 57:113–21.Google Scholar
Nicholas, M.K. and Tyler, J.P.P. (1983). “Characteristics, Attitudes, and Personalities of Al Donors.” Clinical Reproduction and Fertility 2:47–54.Google Scholar
Nielsen, A.F., Pedersen, B., and Lauritsen, J.G. (1995). “Psychosocial Aspects of Donor Insemination: Attitudes and Opinions of Danish and Swedish Donor Insemination Patients to Psychosocial Information Being Supplied to Offspring and Relatives.” Acta Obstetrics and Gynecology of Scandinavia 74:45–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, B., Nielsen, A.F., and Lauritsen, J.G. (1994). “Psychosocial Aspects of Donor Insemination; Sperm Donors: Their Motivations and Attitudes to Artificial Insemination.” Acta Obstetrics Gynecology of Scandinavia 73:701–5.Google Scholar
Pettee, D. and Weckstein, L.N. (1993). “A Survey of Parental Attitudes toward Oocyte Donation.” Human Reproduction 8:1963–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purdie, A. et al. (1992). “Identifiable Semen Donors: Attitudes of Donors and Recipient Couples.” New Zealand Medical Journal 105:27–28.Google Scholar
Robinson, J.N. et al. (1991). “Attitudes of Donors and Recipients to Gamete Donation.” Human Reproduction 6:307–9.Google Scholar
Rowland, R. (1983). “Attitudes and Opinions of Donors on an Artificial Insemination by Donor (AID) Programme.” Clinical Reproduction and Fertility 2:249–59.Google Scholar
Sauer, M.V., Gorrill, M.J., Zeffer, K.B., and Bustillo, M. (1989). “Attitudinal Survey of Sperm Donors to an Artificial Insemination Clinic.” Journal of Reproductive Medicine 34:362–63.Google Scholar
Schover, L.R., Collins, R.L., and Richards, S. (1992). “Psychological Aspects of Donor Insemination: Evaluation and Follow-Up of Recipient Couples.” Fertility and Sterility 57:583–91.Google Scholar
Shenfield, F. (1994). “Filiation in Assisted Reproduction: Potential Legal Implications.” Human Reproduction 9:1348–54.Google Scholar
Shenfield, F. and Steele, S.J. (1997). “What Are the Effects of Anonymity and Secrecy on the Welfare of the Child in Gamete Donation?” Human Reproduction 12:392–95.Google Scholar
Triseliotis, J. (1993). “Donor Insemination and the Child.” Politics and the Life Sciences 12:195–97.Google Scholar
Turner, C. (1993). “A Call for Openness in Donor Insemination.” Politics and the Life Sciences 12:197–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Balen, F., Verdurman, J., and Ketting, V. (1997). “Choices and Motivations of Infertile Couples.” Patient Education and Counseling 31:19–27.Google Scholar
Walker, I. and Broderick, P. (1999). “The Psychology of Assisted Reproduction, or Psychology Assisting Its Reproduction?” Australian Psychologist 34:38–44.Google Scholar
Wellsmore, H. (1999). “Known Donors: The Way of the Future.” Fertility Society of Australia Newsletter 42:9.Google Scholar
Winkler, R.C. and Midford, S.M. (1986). “Biological Identity in Adoption, Artificial Insemination by Donor (AID) and the New Birth Technologies.” Australian Journal of Early Childhood 11:43–48.Google Scholar