Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T03:24:20.532Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The brain, aggression, and public policy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2016

Robert H. Blank
Robert H. Blank*
Affiliation:
Division of Social Sciences New College of Florida 5700 North Tamiami Trail Sarasota, FL 34243-2197 [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Investigational, conceptual, and interventional advances in the neurosciences strain consensus in research ethics, clinical ethics, legal ethics, and jurisprudence and demand innovative adaptation in public policy. I review these advances, ask how they might change a range of policies, and conclude that their implications — particularly relating to aggression — are likely to have been underestimated.

Type
Research Article
Information
Politics and the Life Sciences , Volume 24 , Issue 1-2 , September 2005 , pp. 12 - 21
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Crick, Francis, “Thinking about the brain,” Scientific American (1979), September.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Blakemore, Sarah-Jayne and Frith, Uta, “How does the brain deal with the social world?” Neuroreport (2004), 15(1): 119–28. Adolphs, Ralph, “Cognitive Neuroscience of Human Social Behavior,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience (2003), 4:165–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Moreno, Jonathan D., “Neuroethics: an agenda for neuroscience and society,” Nature Neuroscience (2003), 4:149–53.Google Scholar
4. Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy, Illes, Judith, ed. (New York: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
5. Ethical Challenges in Advanced Neuroimaging, Brain and Cognition, Illes, Judith, ed. (San Diego: Academic Press, 2002).Google Scholar
6. Farah, Martha J., “Emerging ethical issues in neuroscience,” Nature Neuroscience (2002), 5(11): 1123–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Blank, Robert H., Brain Policy (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
8. George, M., Wasserman, E., and Post, R., “Transcranial magnetic stimulation: A neuropsychiatric tool for the 21st century,” Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience (1996), 8:373–82.Google Scholar
9. Philips, Helen, “Brain electrodes cure obsessive patients,” New Scientist (2002), 25 October.Google Scholar
10. George, Mark S., “Stimulating the brain,” Scientific American (2003), 289(3):66–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Pollack, Andrew, “With tiny brain implants, just thinking may make it so,” New York Times (2004), 13 April.Google Scholar
12. “Panel to review pacemaker device for brain,” Reuters (2005); www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5190146/.Google Scholar
13. Hall, Stephen S., “The quest for a smart pill,” Scientific American (2003), 289(3):54–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Steven, P. Rose, R., “‘Smart drugs’: do they work? Are they ethical? Will they be legal?” Nature Reviews/Neuroscience (2002), 3:975–77.Google Scholar
15. Tindall, B., “Better playing through chemistry,” New York Times (2004), October 17: Arts 1.Google Scholar
16. Cartwright, Glenn F., “Virtual or real? The mind in cyberspace,” Futurist (1994), March–April: 22–26.Google Scholar
17. Burdea, Grigori and Coiffet, Philippe, Virtual Reality Technology (New York: John Wiley, 1994).Google Scholar
18. Carney, Stuart and Geddes, John, “Electroconvulsive therapy,” British Medical Journal (2003), 326:43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19. Honderich, Ted, How Free Are You? The Determinism Problem (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
20. Spence, Sean A., Hunter, Mike D., and Harpin, Gemma, “Neuroscience and the will,” Current Opinion in Psychiatry (2002), 15(5):519–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Gazzaniga, Michael S., The Ethical Brain (New York: Dana Press, 2005).Google Scholar
22. Wolpe, Paul R., “Neuroethics of enhancement,” Brain and Cognition (2003), 50:387–95.Google Scholar
23. Perring, Christian, “Medicating children: The case of Ritalin,” Bioethics (1997), 11(3–4):228–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. “Attention deficit drugs may have long-term affects,” Reuters (2003), 8 December.Google Scholar
25. President's Council on Bioethics, Beyond Therapy: Biotechnology and the Pursuit of Happiness (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 2003).Google Scholar
26. Illes, Judith, Rosen, A. C., Huang, L. et al. “Ethical consideration of incidental findings on adult brain MRI in research,” Neurology (2004), 62:888–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27. Hamer, Dean, “Rethinking behavior genetics,” Science (2002), 298:72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28. “The future of mind control,” The Economist (2002), May 23, p. 36.Google Scholar
29. Illes, Judith and Racine, Eric, “Imaging or imagining? A neuroethics challenge informed by genetics.” American Journal of Bioethics (2005), 5(2):5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30. Elliott, F. A., “Neurological findings in adult minimal brain dysfunction and the dyscontrol syndrome,” J New Ment Dis, November (1982), 170(11):680–7.Google Scholar
31. Restak, Richard M., The Modular Brain (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1994).Google Scholar
32. Bushman, Brad J. and Anderson, Craig A., “Is it time to pull the plug on the hostile versus instrumental aggression dichotomy?” Psychology Review (2001), 108:273–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33. Blair, R. J. R., “Neurocognitive models of aggression, the antisocial personality disorders, and psychopathy,” Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry (2001), 71(6):727–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34. Gilbert, Paul, “Evolutionary approaches to psychopathology: The role of natural defences,” Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry (2001), 35(1): 17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35. Comings, David C., “Both genes and environment play a role in antisocial behavior,” Politics and the Life Sciences (1996), 15(l):84–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36. Pincus, Jonathon H., Base Instincts: What Makes Killers Kill? (New York: W. W. Norton, 2002).Google Scholar
37. Blank, , Chapter 8.Google Scholar
38. Filley, Christopher M., Price, Bruce H., Nell, Victor D. et al. “Toward an understanding of violence: neurobehavioral aspects of unwarranted physical aggression,” Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology, & Behavioral Neurology (2001), 14(1):1.Google Scholar
39. Foreman, Judy, “Roots of violence may lie in damaged brain cells,” Los Angeles Times (2002), April 29.Google Scholar
40. Pietrini, Pietro, Guazzelli, Mario, Basso, Gianpaolo, Jaffe, Karen, and Grafman, Jordan, “Neural correlates of imaginal aggressive behavior assessed by positron emission tomography in healthy subjects,” The American Journal of Psychiatry (2000), 157(11):1772–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
41. Mozes, Alan, “Violent images activate brain region,” Reuters (2001), November 15.Google Scholar
42. Anderson, S. W., Bechara, A., Damasio, Hanna, Tranel, Daniel, and Damasio, Antonio R., “Impairment of social and moral behavior related to early damage in human prefrontal cortex,” Nature Neuroscience (1999), 2:1032–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
43. Raine, Adrian, Reynolds, Chandra, Venables, Peter H., Mednick, Sarnoff A., and Farrington, David P., “Fearlessness, stimulation-seeking, and large body size at age 3 years as early predispositions to childhood aggression at age 11 years,” Archives of General Psychiatry (1998), 55(8):745–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
44. Davidson, Richard J., Putnam, Katherine M., and Larson, Christine L., “Dysfunction in the neural circuitry of emotion regulation: A possible prelude to violence,” Science (2000), 289:591–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
45. Gardiner, Amanda, “Brain structure difference linked to disruptive teens,” HealthScoutNews (2002), December 2.Google Scholar
46. Enserink, Martin, “Searching for the mark of Cain,” Science (2000), 289:575–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
47. Szabo, C. A., Xiong, J., Lancaster, J. L., Rainey, L. and Fox, P., “Amygdalar and hippocampal volumetry in control participants: Differences regarding handedness,” American Journal of Neuroradiology (2001), 22:1342–45.Google Scholar
48. Jeffery, .Google Scholar
49. Freedman, D. and Hemenway, D., “Precursors of lethal violence: A death row sample,” Social Science and Medicine (2000), 50:1757–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
50. Jeffery, C. Ray, “The brain, the law, and the medicalization of crime.” In Masters, Roger D. and McGuire, Michael T., eds., The Neurotransmitter Revolution: Serotonin, Social Behavior and the Law (Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
51. Masters, Roger D. and Coplan, Myron, “Toxins, brain chemistry, and behavior,” Optimal Center Newsletter (2001), 262 (October 10); www.mercola.com/2001/oct/10/toxins.html.Google Scholar
52. Carey, Gregory and Gottesman, Irving I., “Genetics and antisocial behavior: Substance versus sound bytes,” Politics and the Life Sciences (1996), 15(1):88–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
53. Anderson, Craig A. and Bushman, Brad J., “Human aggression [altruism and aggression],” Annual Review of Psychology (2002), 53:33.Google Scholar
54. Pope, Harrison G., Kouri, Elena M., and Hudson, James I., “Effects of supraphysiologic doses of testosterone on mood and aggression among men,” Archives of General Psychiatry (2000), 57(2):133–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
55. Davidson, , Putnam, and Larson, .Google Scholar
56. Shinnick-Gallagher, Patricia et al., eds., The Amygdala in Brain Function: Basic and Clinical Approaches (New York: New York Academy of Sciences, 2003).Google Scholar
57. Armony, Jorge L. and Dolan, Raymond J., “Modulation of spatial attention by fear-conditioned stimuli: An event-related fMRI study,” Neuropsychologia (2002), 40(7):817–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
58. Churchland, Patricia Smith, Brain-Wise: Studies in Neurophilosophy (Cambridge: MIT Press, 2002, p. 342).Google Scholar
59. Stein, Murray B., Goldin, Philippe R., Sareen, Jitender, Zorrilla, Lisa T. Eyler, and Brown, Gregory G., “Increased amygdala activation to angry and contemptuous faces in generalized social phobia,” Archives of General Psychiatry (2002), 59(11):1027–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
60. Adolphs, Ralph, “Is the human amygdala specialized for processing social information?” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (2003). 985:326–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
61. Adolphs, Ralph, Tranel, Daniel, and Damasio, Antonio R., “The human amygdala in social judgment,” Nature (1998), 393:470–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
62. Winston, J. S., Strange, B. A., O'Doherty, J., and Dolan, R. J., “Automatic and intentional brain responses during evaluation of trustworthiness of faces,” Nature Neuroscience (2002), 5:277–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
63. Morris, J. S., Oehman, A., and Dolan, R. J., “Conscious and unconscious emotional learning in the amygdala,” Nature (1998), 393:467–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
64. Phillips, Helen, “Private thought, public property,” New Scientist, (2004), 31 July, pp. 38–41.Google Scholar
65. Papps, B. P., Calder, A. J., Young, A. W. and O'Carroll, R. E., “Dissociation of affective modulation of recollective and perceptual experience following amygdala damage,” Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry (2003), 74:253–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
66. Baxter, Mark G. and Murray, Elisabeth A., “The amygdala and reward,” Nature Neuroscience (2002), 3:563–74.Google Scholar
67. Dolan, R. J., “Emotion, cognition, and behavior,” Science (2002), 298:1191–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
68. Yancey, S. W. and Phelps, E. A., “Functional neuroimaging and episodic memory: A perspective,” Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology (2001), 23(1):32–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
69. Rolls, Edmund T., “Memory systems in the brain,” Annual Review of Psychology (2000), 51:599–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
70. Morrison, Paul D., Allardyce, Judith and McKane, Joseph P., “Fear knot: Neurobiological disruption of long-term fear memory,” The British Journal of Psychiatry (2002), 180:195–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
71. Adolphs, Ralph, Tranel, Daniel, Damasio, Hanna, and Damasio, Antonio R., “Fear and the human amygdala,” Journal of Neuroscience (1999), 15:5879–91.Google Scholar
72. Thomas, Kathleen M., Drevets, Wayne C., Dahl, Ronald E. et al. “Amygdala response to fearful faces in anxious and depressed children,” Archives of General Psychiatry (2001), 58(11):1057–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
73. Blair, R. J. R., “Neurobiological basis of psychopathy,” The British Journal of Psychiatry (2003), 182:5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
74. Davidson, , Putnam, , and Larson, .Google Scholar
75. Perry, Bruce D., “Aggression and violence: The neurobiology of experience,” Scholastic (2002); www.teacher.scholastic.com/.Google Scholar
76. Editorial, , “Misplaced faith in ‘mind reading’ scans is sure route to injustice,” New Scientist (2004), 31 July, p. 3.Google Scholar
77. Thompson, Clive, “There's a sucker born in every medial prefrontal cortex,” New York Times (2003), 26 October.Google Scholar
78. Singer, Emily, “They know what you want,” New Scientist (2004), 31 July, pp. 36–37.Google Scholar
79. Phillips, Helen, “Private thoughts, public property,” New Scientist (2004), 31 July, p. 41.Google Scholar
80. Edelman, Marian Wright, “The injustices if the juvenile justice system,” Children's Defense Fund (2005), 11 April; www.childresdefensefund.org/childwatch/050411.aspx.Google Scholar
81. El-Zein, Rhanda A., “Cytogenetic effects in children treated with methylphenidate,” Cancer Letter (2005).Google Scholar
82. Scarano, Victor R., “Psychiatric defenses to criminal offenses,” Current Opinion in Psychiatry (2001), 14(6):559–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
83. Enserink, .Google Scholar
84. Pincus, .Google Scholar
85. Phelps, Elizabeth A., “Faces and races in the brain,” Nature Neuroscience (2001), 4(8):775–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
86. Phelps, Elizabeth A., Cannistraci, Christopher J. and Cunningham, William A., “Intact performance on an indirect measure of race bias following amygdala damage,” Neuropsychologia (2003), 41:204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
87. Ibid. Google Scholar
88. Kurzban, Robert, Tooby, John, and Cosmides, Leda, “Can race be erased? Coalitional computation and social categorization,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2001), 98(26):15387–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
89. Fiske, Susan T., “What we know about bias and intergroup conflict: The problem of the century,” Current Directions in Psychological Science (2002), 11(4):123–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
90. Fischer, Håkan, Wright, Christopher I., Whalen, Paul J., McInerney, Sean C., Shin, Lisa M. and Rauch, Scott L., “Brain habituation during repeated exposure to fearful and neutral faces: A functional MRI study.” Brain Research Bulletin (2003), 59(5):387–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
91. Phelps, Elizabeth A. et al. “Performance on indirect measures on race evaluation predicts amygdala activation,” Journal of Cognitive Neurosciences (2000), 12(5):729–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
92. Pinker, Steven, The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature (New York: Viking, 2002).Google Scholar
93. Fiske, , p. 124.Google Scholar
94. Ibid, at p. 125.Google Scholar
95. Ibid. at p. 127.Google Scholar
96. Hewstone, Miles, Rubin, Mark, and Willis, Hazel, “Intergroup bias,” Annual Reviews of Psychology (2002), 53:575–604.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
97. Horowitz, Donald, The Deadly Ethnic Riot (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
98. Pettigrew, Thomas F., “Intergroup contact theory,” Annual Review of Psychology (1989), 49:65–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
99. Teicher, Martin, “Scars that won't heal: The neurobiology of child abuse,” Scientific American (2002), 286(3):68–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
100. Pincus, .Google Scholar
101. Long, William J. and Brecke, Peter, “The emotive causes of recurrent international conflicts,” Politics and the Life Sciences (2003), 22(1):24–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
102. Editorial, “Violence, crime, and mental illness: How strong a link?” Archives of General Psychiatry (2000), 53(6):484.Google Scholar