Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Mealey, Linda
2001.
Conceptual Challenges in Evolutionary Psychology.
Vol. 27,
Issue. ,
p.
19.
Belderbos, Rene
Van Olffen, Woody
and
Zou, Jianglei
2010.
Generic and Specific Social Learning Mechanisms in Foreign Entry Location Choice.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Santibáñez Yáñez, Cristián
2015.
Mindreading, representación, inferencia y argumentación.
Co-herencia,
Vol. 12,
Issue. 23,
p.
171.
Wielkiewicz, Richard M.
2016.
Myopia is an Adaptive Characteristic of Vision: Not a Disease or Defect.
Review of General Psychology,
Vol. 20,
Issue. 4,
p.
437.
Kets de Vries, Manfred F.R.
2017.
Down the Rabbit Hole of Shame.
SSRN Electronic Journal ,
Silva, Thales Moreira Maia
and
Dos Santos, Lucas Soares
2018.
BREVE ESTUDO INTERDISCIPLINAR ACERCA DA EVOLUÇÃO, ONTOGENIA E COGNIÇÃO DO COMPORTAMENTO RITUAL.
CSOnline - Revista Eletrônica de Ciências Sociais,
Frynta, Daniel
Peléšková, Šárka
Rádlová, Silvie
Janovcová, Markéta
and
Landová, Eva
2019.
Human evaluation of amphibian species: a comparison of disgust and beauty.
The Science of Nature,
Vol. 106,
Issue. 7-8,
Subani, Shaik
and
Suresh, B. V. N. Krishna
2020.
A Fast-Effective Algorithm on A Concise Representation of Top Rated Utility Mining Datasets.
International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology,
p.
188.
Shkliarevsky, Gennady
2021.
In Quest for Justice: Solving the Problem of Inclusion and Equality.
SSRN Electronic Journal ,
Załuski, Wojciech
2022.
Evolutionary theory and feminism.
Studia Iuridica,
p.
221.
El-Masri, Azza
Riedl, Martin J.
and
Woolley, Samuel
2022.
Audio misinformation on WhatsApp: A case study from Lebanon.
Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review,
Tejedor, Santiago
Tusa, Fernanda
and
Cervi, Laura
2022.
Estudio comparativo sobre el potencial del meme como recurso de comunicación política: recepción, usos y significados en estudiantes universitarios (Ecuador-España).
Revista de la Asociación Española de Investigación de la Comunicación,
p.
133.