Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T18:34:48.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Zen and the Science of American Politics: Minority Religious Traditions and Political Engagement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 February 2013

Patrick Schoettmer
Patrick Schoettmer*
Affiliation:
University of Notre Dame
*
Address correspondence and request for reprints to: Patrick SchoettmerUniversity of Notre Dame. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

American Buddhism is a phenomenon that allows for the testing of a number of generally-held assumptions about how religion operates within the American context. Due to the fairly de-politicized character of the religion in the United States, Buddhism allows for the examination of religion-qua-religion insofar as its role in the political mobilization of believers. This study finds that Buddhist political engagement is driven in general by private religious practice rather than by communal or small-group religious participation, as social capital-oriented theories of religio-political engagement suggest. Furthermore, this appears likely to be due to the nature of Buddhist adherents in the United States (who are predominantly Caucasian converts to the faith and who enjoy a generally high socio-economic status.) Closer examination of the situation of Buddhists in the United States suggests that the resource-model of civic skill acquisition does hold among the most economically disadvantaged, but that other explanations help us better understand political engagement among more advantaged Buddhists.

Type
Articles
Information
Politics and Religion , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , March 2013 , pp. 164 - 185
Copyright
Copyright © Religion and Politics Section of the American Political Science Association 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Beyerlein, Kraig, and Chaves, Mark. 2003. “The Political Activities of Religious Congregations in the United States.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 42:229–246.Google Scholar
Campbell, David E. 2004. “Acts of Faith: Churches and Political Engagement.” Political Behavior 26:155–180.Google Scholar
Campbell, David E. 2006. Why We Vote: How Schools and Communities Shape our Civic Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Djupe, Paul A., and Gilbert, Christopher P.. 2006. “The Resourceful Believer: Generating Civic Skills in Church.” Journal of Politics 68:116–127.Google Scholar
Djupe, Paul A., and Gilbert, Christopher P.. 2009. The Political Influence of Churches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gregory, Peter. 2001. “Describing the Elephant: Buddhism in America.” Religion and American Culture 11:233–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Fredrick. 1999. Something Within: Religion in African-American Political Activism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald, and Norris, Pippa. 2003. Sacred and Secular: Religion and Politics Worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jones-Correa, Michael, and Leal, David L.. 2001. “Political Participation: Does Religion Matter?” Political Research Quarterly 54:751–770.Google Scholar
Nie, Norman, Junn, Jane, and Stehlik-Barry, Kenneth. 1996. Education and Democratic Citizenship. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Numrich, Paul David. 2008. “North American Buddhism: A Field of Study?” in North American Buddhists in Social Context, ed. Numrich, Paul David. Leiden: Koninklihke Brill.Google Scholar
Pew Research Center. 2008. “US Religious Landscape Survey.” http://religions.pewforum.org/pdf/report-religious-landscape-study-full.pdf (Accessed on March 12, 2010).Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 2001. Social Capital Benchmark Survey, 2000. Storrs, CT: Roper Center.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D., and Campbell, David E.. 2010. American Grace: How Religion Is Reshaping Our Civic and Political Lives. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Schoettmer, Patrick L. 2010. “Muslims, Religiosity, and Political Engagement in post-9/11 America.” Presented at the Midwest Political Science Conference, Chicago.Google Scholar
Sharot, Stephen. 2002. “Beyond Christianity: A Critique of the Rational Choice Theory of Religion from a Weberian and Comparative Religions Perspective.” Sociology of Religion 63:427–454.Google Scholar
Smidt, Corwin. 1999. “Religion and Civic Engagement: A Comparative Analysis.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences 565:176–192.Google Scholar
Smidt, Corwin. 2007. “Evangelical and Mainline Protestants at the Turn of the Millennium: Taking Stock and Looking Forward.” In From Pews to Polling Places: Faith and Politics in the American Religious Mosaic, ed. Matthew, Wilson J.Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 29–52.Google Scholar
Smith, Buster G. 2006. “Buddhism in America: An analysis of social receptivity.” Contemporary Buddhism 7:149–164.Google Scholar
Smith, Buster G. 2009. “American Buddhism: A Sociological Perspective.” Ph.D. diss. Waco, TX: Baylor University.Google Scholar
Smith, Buster G., and Froese, Paul. 2008. “The Sociology of Buddhism: Theoretical Implications of Current Scholarship.” Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion 4:3–24.Google Scholar
Steinhauser, Paul. 2010. “Poll: Most Americans say Tibet should be independent.” http://www.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/asiapcf/02/18/tibet.poll/index.html (Accessed June 28, 2010).Google Scholar
Verba, Sidney, Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and Brady, Henry E.. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wald, Kenneth D., Owen, Dennis E., and Hill, Samuel S. Jr. 1988. “Churches as Political Communities.” American Political Science Review 82:531–548.Google Scholar
Welch, Michael R., and Leege, David C.. 1991. “Dual Reference Groups and Political Orientations: An Examination of Evangelically Oriented Catholics.” American Journal of Political Science 35:28–56.Google Scholar
Wilcox, Clyde, and Robinson, Carin. 2007. “Prayers, Parties, and Preachers: The Evolving Nature of Political and Religious Mobilization.” In From Pews to Polling Places: Faith and Politics in the American Religious Mosaic, ed. Wilson, J. Matthew. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 1–28.Google Scholar
Wolfe, Alan. 2003. The Transformation of American Religion: How We Actually Live Our Faith. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Wuthnow, Robert, and Cadge, Wendy. 2004. “Buddhists and Buddhism in the United States: The Scope of Influence.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 43:363–380.Google Scholar
Wuthnow, Robert, and Hackett, Conrad. 2003. “The Social Integration of Practitioners of Non-Western Religions in the United States.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 42:651–667.Google Scholar