Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T18:25:38.700Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Republicans, Catholics and the West: Explaining the Strength of Religious School Aid Prohibitions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 August 2013

Ursula Hackett
Ursula Hackett*
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Ursula Hackett, Department of Politics and International Relations, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the current polarized political climate there is heightened attention paid to the American state constitutional provisions known as “Blaine Amendments” or “No-Aid Provisions” that were passed between 1835 and 1959 to prohibit public aid to religious schools. Judgments about No-Aid Provisions have largely been made by scholars on an ad hoc basis using narrative-based historical accounts, emotive language and without clear classificatory criteria. Using content analysis this article constructs the first quantitative scale of No-Aid Provision strength and subjects it to statistical treatment to explain why some prohibitions are much stronger than others. It finds that larger Catholic populations, Republican dominance, and Federal Enabling Acts make No-Aid language more strident. In so doing this article adjudicates between competing explanations for No-Aid Provision strength in a way that illuminates the interaction of politics, religion and education in America.

Type
Articles
Information
Politics and Religion , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , September 2014 , pp. 499 - 520
Copyright
Copyright © Religion and Politics Section of the American Political Science Association 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adams, N.A. 2005. “Pedigree of an Unusual Blaine Amendment: Article 1, Section 3 Interpreted and Implemented in Florida Education.” Nova Law Review 30:1–74.Google Scholar
Alvarez, L. 2012. “Voters in Florida Are Set to Weigh in on Two Contentious Ballot Questions.” The New York Times http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/07/us/floridians-face-initiatives-on-abortion-and-church-and-state.html (Accessed on August 7, 2013).Google Scholar
Annbinder, T. 1992. Nativism and Slavery: The Northern Know-Nothings and the Politics of the 1850s. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Arend, J.J. 1961. Matthews v Quinton, 362 P.2d 932. Alaska Supreme Court.Google Scholar
Bassett, J.M. 1875. “Grant”s Religious Plank.” Los Angeles Daily Herald, October 13.Google Scholar
Bybee, J.S., and Newton, D.W.. 2002. “Of Orphans and Vouchers: Nevada's ‘Little Blaine Amendment’ and the Future of Religious Participation in Public Programs.” Nevada Law Journal 2:551–589.Google Scholar
Clarke, K.A. 2005. “The Phantom Menace: Omitted Variable Bias in Econometric Research.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 22 (4).Google Scholar
DeForrest, M.E. 2003. “An Overview and Evaluation of State Blaine Amendments: Origins, Scope, and First Amendment Concerns.” Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 26:551–626.Google Scholar
Dubin, M.J. 2007. Party Affiliations in the State Legislatures: A Year By Year Summary, 1796–2006. Jefferson, NC: McFarland and Company, Inc. Google Scholar
Duncan, K. 2006. “Secularism's Laws: State Blaine Amendments and Religious Persecution.” Bepress Legal Series 26.Google Scholar
Finke, R., and Stark, R. 1992. The Churching of America, 1776–1990: Winners and Losers in Our Religious Economy. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Florida Department of State, Division of Elections. “Religious Freedom Ballot Initiative.” http://election.dos.state.fl.us/ (Accessed on August 7, 2013).Google Scholar
Fusarelli, L.D. 2003. The Political Dynamics of School Choice: Negotiating Contested Terrain. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Garnett, R.W. 2004. “The Theology of the Blaine Amendments.” First Amendment Law Review 2:45–84.Google Scholar
Gedicks, F.M. 2004. “Reconstructing the Blaine Amendments.” First Amendment Law Review 2:85–106.Google Scholar
Green, S.K. 2004. “‘Blaming Blaine’: Understanding the Blaine Amendment and the ‘No Funding‘ Principle.” First Amendment Law Review 2:107–152.Google Scholar
Green, S.K. 2008. “The Insignificance of the Blaine Amendment.” Brigham Young University Law Review XX:295–333.Google Scholar
Green, S.K. 2012. The Bible, the School, and the Constitution. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heytens, T.J. 2000. “School Choice and State Constitutions.” Virginia Law Review 86:117–162.Google Scholar
Jefferson, T. 1802. “Jefferson's Letter to the Danbury Baptists.” Library of Congress http://www.loc.gov/loc/lcib/9806/danpre.html (Accessed on August 7, 2013).Google Scholar
Johnson, D.F. 2008. State Blaine Amendments: Origins, History, and Education Policy Implications Following Mitchell, Zelman, and Locke. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida.Google Scholar
Kemerer, F.R. 1997. “The Constitutional Dimension of School Vouchers.” Texas Forum on Civil Liberties and Civil Rights 3:137–186.Google Scholar
Kinzer, D.L. 1964. An Episode in Anti-Catholicism: The American Protective Association. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Kiousis, S. 2004. “Explicating Media Salience: A Factor Analysis of New York Times Issues Coverage During the 2000 U.S. Presidential Election.” Journal of Communication 54: 71–87.Google Scholar
Leach, J. 1968. Honohan v Holt, 17 Ohio 57. Common Pleas Court of Franklin County.Google Scholar
Lee, L.F. 1982. “Specification Error in Multinomial Logit Models: Analysis of the Omitted Variable Bias.” Journal of Econometrics 20:197–209.Google Scholar
Overdyke, W.D. 1950. The Know-Nothing Party in the South. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Press.Google Scholar
Peterson, P.E., and Campbell, D.E.. 2001. Charters, Vouchers, and Public Education. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Plakon, and Precourt. 2011. CS/HJR 1471 Religious Freedom. CS/HJR.Google Scholar
Stern, M.D. 2004. “Blaine Amendments, Anti-Catholicism, and Catholic Dogma.” First Amendment Law Review 2:153–178.Google Scholar
Tarr, G.A. (ed). 2011. The Oxford Commentaries on the State Constitutions of the United States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Hackett Supplementary Files

Appendix

Download Hackett Supplementary Files(File)
File 60.4 KB