Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T18:12:01.910Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Religious Legacies, Churches, and the Shaping of Immigration Policies in the Age of Religious Diversity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2008

Michael Minkenberg
Michael Minkenberg*
Affiliation:
New York University/Viadrina European University Frankfurt (Oder)
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Michael Minkenberg. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Western democracies are undergoing a process of extraordinary religious and cultural pluralization which is largely a result of an intensified immigration over the last decades. This article analyzes in a structural and an actor-oriented perspective the way in which religion affects the immigration policies in 19 Western democracies. Based on a typology of immigration regimes in 19 Western democracies, the article asks what role Christian legacies (Catholic and Protestant traditions, church-state regimes, Christian parties) and churches (both Catholic and Protestant) play in bringing about particular immigration policies. It follows the “family of nations” concept in comparative policy research (F. Castles) and argues that the interplay of nation building, religious traditions and church-state-relations affect churches' role in the making of immigration policy. This role signifies a disjuncture between the countries' general patterns of religious traditions and immigration policies on the one hand, and the actual policy positions and effects of churches on the other.

Type
Articles
Information
Politics and Religion , Volume 1 , Issue 3 , December 2008 , pp. 349 - 383
Copyright
Copyright © Religion and Politics Section of the American Political Science Association 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aleinikoff, T. Alexander, and Klusmeyer, Douglas, eds. 2000. From Migrants to Citizens: Membership in a Changing World. Washington, D.C.: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
Aleinikoff, T. Alexander, and Klusmeyer, Douglas, eds. 2001. Citizenship Today: Global Perspectives and Practices. Washington, D.C.: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
Aleinikoff, T. Alexander, and Klusmeyer, Douglas, eds. 2002. Citizenship Policies for an Age of Migration. Washington, D.C.: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
Alesina, Alberto, Devleeschauwer, Arnaud, Easterly, William, Kurlat, Sergio, and Wacziarg, Romain. 2003. “Fractionalization.” Journal of Economic Growth 82:219–58.Google Scholar
Almond, Gabriel A., and Powell, G. Bingham Jr. 1978. Comparative Politics. System, Process, and Policy. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Anderson, John. 2003. Religious Liberty in Transitional Societies. The Politics of Religion. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bader, Veit, ed. 2007. “Governing Islam in Western Europe. Essays of Governance of Religious Diversity.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 33:871–1016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin-Edwards, Martin. 1992. “Immigration after 1992.” Policy and Politics 19:199–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, David, Kurian, George, and Johnson, Todd, eds. 2001. World Christian Encyclopedia: A Comparative Survey of Churches and Religion. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barwig, Klaus. 1999. “Nur ein Übergangsmodell? Eine Bilanz zur Reform des deutschen Staatsangehörigkeitsgesetz (Only a transition model? The balance of the reform of the German nationality code).” Herder Korrespondenz 53:345–50.Google Scholar
Beck, Ulrich. 1986. Risikogesellschaft. Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne (Risk Society. Towards Another Modernity). Frankfurt/Main, Germany: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Beyer, Peter, and Beaman, Lori, eds. 2007. Religion, Globalization, and Culture. Boston, MA: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouma, Gary. 2006. Australian Soul. Religion and Spirituality in the Twenty-first Century. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowden, John, ed. 2005. Encyclopedia of Christianity. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Breward, Ian. 2001. A History of the Churches in Australasia. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brubaker, Rogers. 1992. Citizenship and Nationhood in France and Germany. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruce, Steve. 2000. Fundamentalism. Oxford, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Bruce, Steve. 1996. Religion in the Modern world. From Cathedrals to Cults. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bruce, Steve. 2002. God is Dead. Secularization in the West. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bruce, Steve. 2003. Politics and Religion. Oxford, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
Buos, Constance de. 2004. “Les chrétiens avec les sans-papier (The Christians with the Undocumented).” La Croix, July 7.Google Scholar
Burdick, Laura, and Chenoweth, Jeff. 2007. A More Perfect Union. A National Citizenship Plan. Washington, D.C.: Catholic Legal Immigration Network, Inc.Google Scholar
Cahill, Desmond, Bouma, Gary, Dellal, Hass, and Leahy, Michael. 2004. Religion, Cultural Diversity and Safeguarding Australia. Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
Castles, Francis, ed. 1993. Families of Nations. Patterns of Public Policy in Western Democracies. Aldershot, UK: Dartmouth.Google Scholar
Castles, Francis. 1998. Patterns of Public Policy. Patterns of Post-War Transformation. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Chaves, Mark, and Cann, David E.. 1992. “Regulation, Pluralism, and Religious Market Structure.” Rationality and Society 4:272–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christiansen, Drew. 1996. “Movement, Asylum, Borders: Christian Perspectives.” International Migration Review 30:7–17.Google Scholar
Church of England. 2001. “Bishops Respond to Home Secretary's Asylum Proposals.” http://www.cofe.anglican.org/news/news_item.2004-10-19.9719446477 (Accessed February 15, 2007).Google Scholar
Church of England, Board for Social Responsibility. 2002. Secure Borders, Safe Haven – Integration with Diversity in Modern Britain. London, UK: Church House.Google Scholar
Church of England, Mission and Public Affairs Council. 2005: A place of Refuge. A Positive Approach to Asylum Seekers and Refugees in the UK. London, UK: Church House Publishing.Google Scholar
Church of England. 2000. “Party Leaders Assure Church Delegations on Racism in Politics.” http://www.cofe.anglican.org/news/party_leaders_assure_church_delegations_on_racism.html (Accessed February 15, 2007).Google Scholar
Conférence des évêques de France, Commission sociale des Evêques. 2002. Accueillir les demandeurs l'asile. Déclaration de la Conférence des évêques de France sur le droit d'asile (Welcoming the Asylum Seekers. Declaration of the Bishops' Conference of France on the Right to Asylum). Paris, France: Bishops' Conference.Google Scholar
Cooperman, Alan. 2006. “Letter on Immigration Deepens Split Among Evangelicals.” The Washington Post, April 5, A4.Google Scholar
Cornelius, Wayne A., Martin, Philip L., and Hollifield, James F., eds. 1994. Controlling Immigration. A Global Perspective. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Costes, André. 1988. “L'Eglise catholique dans le débat sur l'immigration (The Catholic Church in the Immigration Debate).” Revue Européenne des Migrations Internationales 4:29–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalton, Russell J. 1996. Citizen Politics. Chatham, UK: Chatham House Publishers.Google Scholar
Davie, Grace. 2000. Religion in Modern Europe: A Memory Mutates. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ecclestone, Giles. 1985. “The General Synod and Politics.” In Church and Politics Today: Essays on the Role of the Church of England in Contemporary Politics, ed. Moyser, George. Edinburgh, UK: T. & T. Clark. Ltd, 107–27.Google Scholar
Enzinger, Han. 2000. “The Dynamics of Integration Policies: A Multidimensional Model.” In Challenging Immigration and Ethnic Relations Politics, eds. Koopmans, Ruud, and Statham, Paul. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 97–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fetzer, Joel, and Soper, J. Christopher. 2005. Muslims and the State in Britain, France, and Germany. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fetzer, Joel. 2006. “Why Did House Members Vote for H.R. 4437?” International Migration Review 40:698–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaulmyn, Isabelle de. 2004. “L'Eglise et l'accueil des sans-Papiers (The Church and the Welcoming of the Undocumented).” La Croix, June 16.Google Scholar
Geddes, Andrew. 1999. “The Development of EU Immigration Policy: Supranationalisation and the Politics of Belonging.” In The Politics of Belonging: Migrants and Minorities in Contemporary Europe, eds. Geddes, Andrew, and Favell, Adrian. Aldersho, UK: Ashgate, 176–91.Google Scholar
Gillis, Chester. 2003. “American Catholics. Neither out Far nor in Deep.” In Religion and Immigration. Christian, Jewish and Muslim Experiences in the United States, eds. Yazbeck Haddad, Yvonne, Smith, Jane, and Esposito, John L.. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press, 33–51.Google Scholar
Gimpel, James G., and Edwards, James R. Jr. 1999. The Congressional Politics of Immigration Reform. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Gustafsson, Göran. 2003. “Church-State Separation – Swedish Style.” In Church and State in Contemporary Europe: The Chimera of Neutrality, eds. Madeley, John and Enyedi, Zolt. London, UK: Routledge, 51–72.Google Scholar
Hammar, Tomas, ed. 1985. European Immigration Policy. A Comparative Study. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammar, Tomas. 1990. Democracy and the Nation State. Aliens, Denizens, and Citizens in a World of International Migration. Aldershot, UK: Avebury.Google Scholar
Hammar, Tomas. 2003. “Einwanderung in einen skandinavischen Wohlfahrtsstaat: die schwedische Erfahrung (Immigration into a Scandinavian Welfare State: The Swedish Experience).” In Migration im Spannungsfeld von Globalisierung und Nationalstaat, eds. Dietrich, Thränhardt and Hunger, Uwe. Wiesbaden, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag, 227–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanley, David. 2003. “Die Zukunft der europäischen Christdemokratie (The Future of the European Christian Democracy).” In Politik und Religion, eds. Minkenberg, Michael and Willems, Ulrich. Wiesbaden, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag, 231–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haynes, Jeff. 1998. Religion in Global Politics. London, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
Heinelt, Hubert. 1994. “Zuwanderungspolitik in Europa. Nationale Politiken – Gemeinsamkeiten und Unterschiede (Immigration Policy in Europe. National Politics – Commonalities and Differences).” In Zuwanderungspolitik in Europa. Nationale Politiken – Gemeinsamkeiten und Unterschiede, ed. Heinelt, Hubert. Opladen, Germany: Leske + Budrich, 7–32.Google Scholar
Hollifield, James F. 1997. L'immigration et l'état nation à la recherche d'un modèle national (Immigration and the Nation State in Search of a National Model). Paris, France: L'Harmattan.Google Scholar
Hollifield, James F. 1998. “Migration, Trade and the Nation-State: The Myth of Globalization.” UCLA Journal of International Law and Foreign Affairs 3:595–636.Google Scholar
Huber, Wolfgang, 2001: Kein Mensch ist illegal – Der Auftrag der Kirchen gegenüber Menschen ohne Aufenthaltsstatus (No Human Being Is Illegal – The Mission of the Churches Concerning People Without a Residence Permit). Lecture on July 9 2001 at the Free University Berlin.Google Scholar
Iannaccone, Laurence. 1991. “The Consequences of Religious Market Structure. Adam Smith and the Economics of Religion.” Rationality and Society 3:156–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald, and Baker, Wayne E.. 2000. “Modernization, Cultural Change, and the Persistence of Traditional Values.” American Sociological Review 65:19–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald, and Minkenberg, Michael. 2000. “Die Transformation religiöser Werte in entwickelten Industriegesellschaften. (The Transformation of Religious Values in Advanced Industrial Societies)” In Religion und Politik – zwischen Universalismus und Partikularismus, eds. Meyer, Heinz-Dieter, Minkenberg, Michael, and Ostner, Ilona, Vol. 2. Opladen, Germany: Leske + Budrich. 115–30.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald. 1997. Modernization and Postmodernization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joppke, Christian. 1999. Immigration and the Nation-State. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kastoryano, Riva. 2002. Negotiating Identities. States and Immigrants in France and Germany. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kock, Manfred. 2001. Bitte einwandern! Für einen Perspektivwechsel in der Politik (Please Immigrate! For a Change of Perspective in Politics). Statement beim Forum Migration: Leben in der bunten Republik – DEKT Frankfurt/Main.Google Scholar
Koopmans, Ruud, Statham, Paul, Giugni, Marco, and Passy, Florence. 2005. Contested Citizenship. Immigration and Cultural Diversity in Europe. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, Will, and Norman, Wayne, eds. 2000. Citizenship in Diverse Societies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arend, 1999. Patterns of Democracy. Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Mahony, Roger. 2006. “Called by God to Help.” The New York Times, March 22.Google Scholar
Mallmann, Yves de. 2004. “De Saint-Ambroise à Saint-Bernard.” http://www.ceras-project.com/index.php?id=1350. (Accessed March 2008).Google Scholar
Manow, Philip. 2002. “‘The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly.’ Esping-Andersens Sozialstaats-Typologie und die konfessionellen Wurzeln des westliches Wohlfahrtsstaats.” Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 54:203–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maréchal, Brigitte, and Dassetto, Felice. 2003. “Introduction: From Past to Present.” In Muslims in the Enlarged Europe. Religion and Society, eds. Maréchal, Brigitte, Allievi, Stefano, Dassetto, Felice, and Jørgen, Nielsen. Leiden, Germany: Brill, xvii–xxvii.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, David. 1978. A General Theory of Secularisation. London, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mavrogordatos, George. 2003. “Orthodoxy and Nationalism in the Greek Case.” In Church and State in Contemporary Europe: The Chimera of Neutrality, eds. Madeley, John and Enyedi, Zolt. London, UK: Routledge, 117–36.Google Scholar
McGoldrick, Terence. 1998. “Episcopal Conferences Worldwide on Catholic Social Teaching.” Theological Studies 59:22–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minkenberg, Michael. 2004. “Religious Effects on the Shaping of Immigration Policy in Western Democracies. Presented at the ECPR 32nd Joint Session of Workshops, Uppsala.Google Scholar
Minkenberg, Michael. 1990. Neokonservatismus und Neue Rechte in den USA (Neoconservatism and the New Right in the USA). Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos.Google Scholar
Minkenberg, Michael. 2002. “Religion and Public Policy. Institutional, Cultural, and Political Impact on the Shaping of Abortion Policies in Western Democracies.” Comparative Political Studies 35:221–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minkenberg, Michael. 2003a. “The Policy Impact of Church-State Relations: Family Policy and Abortion in Britain, France and Germany.” In Church and State in Contemporary Europe: The Chimera of Neutrality, eds. Madeley, John and Zolt, Enyedi. London, UK: Routledge, 195–217.Google Scholar
Minkenberg, Michael. 2003b. “Staat und Kirche in westlichen Demokratien (State and Church in Western Democracies).” In Politik und Religion, eds. Minkenberg, Michael and Willems, Ulrich. Wiesbaden, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag, 115–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minkenberg, Michael. 2003c. “The Politics of Citizenship in the New Republic.” In Germany: Beyond the Stable State, eds. Kitschelt, Herbert, and Streeck, Wolfgang. London, UK: Routledge. 219–240.Google Scholar
Minkenberg, Michael. 2008. “Religious Legacies and the Politics of Multiculturalism: A Convergence of Integration Policies in Western Democracies?” In Immigration, Integration and Human Security Issues, eds. d'Appolonia, Simon Reichand Chebel. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Modood, Tariq, ed. 1997. Church, State, and Religious Minorities. London, UK: Policy Studies Institute.Google Scholar
Monsma, Steven J., and Soper, J. Christopher. 1997. The Challenge of Pluralism. Church and State in Five Democracies. Lanham, UK: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Mooney, Margarita. 2006. “The Catholic Bishops Conferences of the US and France: Engaging Immigration as a Public Issues.” American Behavioral Scientist 49:1455–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Association of Evangelicals. 1995. Compassion for Immigrants and Refugees. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
National Association of Evangelicals. 2000. Refugee Protection and Care. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Nelson, Barbara. 1998. “Public Policy and Administration: An Overview.” In A New Handbook of Political Science, eds. Goodin, R.E., and Klingemann, H.D.. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. 551–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noll, Mark. 2002. The Old Religion in a New World: The History of North American Christianity. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Ragin, Charles. 1987. Comparative Political Analysis: Bridging the Qualitative and Quantative Divide. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rat der, E.K.D., Deutsche Bischofskonferenz/Mitglieds- und Gastkirchen der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Christlicher Kirchen. 1998: … und der Fremdling, der in deinen Toren ist. Gemeinsames Wort der Kirchen zu den Herausforderungen durch Migration und Flucht (… and the Stranger Who is at Your Door. Joint Statement of the Churches on the Challenges of Migration and Flight). Bonn/Frankfurt am Main/Hannover: EKD, Deutsche Bischofskonferenz, Arbeitsgemeinschaft Christlicher Kirchen.Google Scholar
Robertson, Roland and Garrett, William R., eds. 1991. Religion and Global Order. New York, NY: Paragon House.Google Scholar
Sandersfeld, Corina. 2002. “Union und Kirchen zum Thema Zuwanderung (Union and Churches on the immigration Topic).” Stimmen der Zeit, 220/127:492–96.Google Scholar
Soysal, Yasemin N. 1994. Limits of Citizenship. Migrants and Postnational Membership in Europe. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Tassel, Fabrice. 2006. “Croisade contre la loi Sarkozy sur l'immigration (Crusade against the Sarkozy Law on Immigration).” Libération, April 22.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 2007. A Secular Age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Thränhardt, Dietrich, and Hunger, Uwe, eds. 2003. Migration im Spannungsfeld von Globalisierung und Nationalstaat (The Nation State as Actor in Migration Politics). Wiesbaden, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
Thränhardt, Dietrich. 2003. “Der Nationalstaat als migrationspolitischer Akteur (Migration between Globalization and Nation State).” In Migration im Spannungsfeld von Globalisierung und Nationalstaat, eds. Thränhardt, Dietrich and Hunger, Uwe. Wiesbaden, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag. 8–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Amersfoort, Hans, and van Niekerk, Mies. 2003. “Einwanderung als koloniales Erbe: Akzeptanz, Nichtakzeptanz und Integration in den Niederlanden (Immigration as Colonial Legacies: Acceptance, Non-acceptance and Integration in the Netherlands).” In Migration im Spannungsfeld von Globalisierung und Nationalstaat, eds. Thränhardt, Dietrich, and Hunger, Uwe. Wiesbaden, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag, 135–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Kersbergen, Kees. 1995. Social Capitalism. A Study of Christian Democracy and the Welfare State. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Von Beyme, Klaus. 1984. Parteien in westlichen Demokratien (Parties in Western Democracies). München, Germany: Piper.Google Scholar
Von Beyme, Klaus. 1999. Die parlamentarische Demokratie. Entstehung und Funktionsweise 1789–1999 (Parliamentary Democracy. Genesis and Functioning 1789–1999). Wiesbaden, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
Wald, Kenneth. 2003. Religion and Politics in the United States. Washington, DC. CQ Press.Google Scholar
Weil, Patrick. 1991. La France et ses étrangers. L'aventure d'une politique d'immigration 1938–1991 (France and Her Foreigners: The Adventure of Immigration Politics 1938–1991). Paris, France: Calman-Lévy.Google Scholar
Weil, Patrick. 2001. “Zugang zur Staatsbürgerschaft. Ein Vergleich von 25 Staatsangehörigkeitsgesetzen. (Access to Citizenship. A Comparison of 25 Nationality Codes)” In Staatsbürgerschaft in Europa. Historische Erfahrungen und aktuelle Debatten, eds. Conrad, Christoph and Kocka, Jürgen. Hamburg, Germany: Körber Stiftung. 92–111.Google Scholar
Weil, Patrick. 2002. Qu'est-ce qu'un Français? Histoire de la nationalité française depuis la Révolution (What is a Frenchman? History of the French Nationality Code science the Revolution). Paris, France: Grasset.Google Scholar
Weltalmanach, Fischer. 2004. Der Fischer Weltalmanach 2005. Frankfurt/Main, Germany: Fischer Verlag.Google Scholar
Whyte, John H. 1981. Catholics in Western Democracies. A Study in Political Behavior. New York, NY: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Wilensky, Harold. 2002. Rich Democracies. Political Economy, Public Policy and Performance. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winkelmann, Rainer. 2001. Immigration policies and their Impact : The Case of New Zealand and Australia. In International Migration: Trends, Policies and Economic Impact, ed. Djajić, Slobodan. London, UK: Routledge. 1–20.Google Scholar
Wong, Carolyn. 2006. Lobbying for Inclusion. Rights Politics and the Making of Immigration Policy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
World Relief. 2005. “Interfaith Statement in Support of Comprehensive Immigration Reform.” www.wr.org/whatwedo/immigrantservices/reform.asp (Accessed March 4, 2007).Google Scholar