Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T12:30:51.792Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Morality in Context: A Multilevel Analysis of the Relationship between Religion and Values in Europe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 December 2015

Ingrid Storm
Ingrid Storm*
Affiliation:
University of Manchester
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Ingrid Storm, Cathie Marsh Institute for Social Research, University of Manchester, Humanities Bridgeford Street 2.13W, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The exact relationship between religiosity and moral values is understudied, and it is unclear what the process of secularization means for the morality of Europeans. Previous research shows that religion is associated with low levels of political and economic development. A potential explanation is that religion provides an alternative moral authority to the authority of the state. Using data from four waves of the European Values Study 1981–2008, I analyze attitudes to personal autonomy (vs tradition) and self-interest (vs social norms) in a multilevel model of 48 European countries. The results show that religious decline has been accompanied by an increase in autonomy values, but not self-interest, that the relationship between religion and morality is stronger in more religious countries, and that it has declined since the 1980s. We also show that religiosity is more negatively associated with self-interest among people with low confidence in state authorities.

Type
Articles
Information
Politics and Religion , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , March 2016 , pp. 111 - 138
Copyright
Copyright © Religion and Politics Section of the American Political Science Association 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Achterberg, Peter, Houtman, Dick, Aupers, Stef, de Koster, Willem, Mascini, Peter, and van der Waal, Jeroen. 2009. “A Christian Cancellation of the Secularist Truce? Waning Christian Religiosity and Waxing Religious Deprivatization in the West.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 48:687–701.Google Scholar
Altemeyer, Bob. 1981. Right-wing Authoritarianism. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press.Google Scholar
Barker, David G. 1992. “Changing Social Values in Europe.” Business Ethics: A European Review 1:91–103.Google Scholar
Becker, Penny Edgell, and Dhingra, Pawan H.. 2001. “Religious Involvement and Volunteering: Implications for Civil Society.” Sociology of Religion 62:315–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berns, Gregory S., Bell, Emily, Capra, Monica, Prietula, Michael J., Moore, Sara, Anderson, Brittany, Ginges, Jeremy, and Atran, Scott. 2012. “The Price of Your Soul: Neural Evidence for the Non-utilitarian Representation of Sacred Values.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 367:754–762.Google Scholar
Burkett, Steven, and White, Mervin. 1974. “Hellfire and Delinquency: Another Look.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 13:455–462.Google Scholar
Finke, Roger, and Adamczyk, Amy. 2008. “Cross-National Moral Beliefs: The Influence of National Religious Context.” Sociological Quarterly 49:617–652.Google Scholar
Flanagan, Scott C., and Lee, Aie-Rie. 2003. “The New Politics, Culture Wars, and the Authoritarian-Libertarian Value Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies.” Comparative Political Studies 36:235–270.Google Scholar
Galen, Luke W. 2012. “Does Religious Belief Promote Prosociality? A Critical Examination.” Psychological Bulletin 138:876–906.Google Scholar
Haidt, Jonathan. 2012. The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion. New York, NY: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Halpern, David. 2001. “Moral Values, Social Trust and Inequality: Can Values Explain Crime?” British Journal of Criminology 41:236–251.Google Scholar
Hitlin, Steven, and Vaisey, Stephen. 2013. “The New Sociology of Morality.” Annual Review of Sociology 39:51–68.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald, and Welzel, Christian. 2005. Modernization, Cultural Change and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jost, John T., Glaser, Jack, Kruglanski, Arie W., and Sulloway, Frank J.. 2003. “Political Conservatism as Motivated Social Cognition.” Psychological Bulletin 129:339–375.Google Scholar
McCullough, Michael E., and Willoughby, Brian L. B.. 2009. “Religion, Self-regulation, and Self-control: Associations, Explanations, and Implications.” Psychological Bulletin 135:69–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nevitte, Neil, and Cochrane, Christopher. 2006. “Individualization in Europe and America: Connecting Religious and Moral Values.” Comparative Sociology 5:203–230.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa, and Inglehart, Ronald. 2004. Sacred and Secular: Religion and Politics Worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Preacher, Kristopher J., and MacCallum, Robert C.. 2003. “Repairing Tom Swift's Electric Factor Analysis Machine.” Understanding Statistics 2:13–43.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D., and Campbell, David E.. 2010. American Grace: How Religion Divides and Unites Us. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Ribberink, E., Achterberg, P., and Houtman, D. 2013. “Deprivatization of Disbelief?: Non-Religiosity and Anti-Religiosity in 14 Western European Countries.” Politics and Religion 6:101–120.Google Scholar
Ruiter, Stijn., and De Graaf, Nan Dirk. 2006. “National Context, Religiosity, and Volunteering: Results from 53 Countries.” American Sociological Review 71:191–210.Google Scholar
Saroglou, Vassilis. 2006. “Religion's Role in Prosocial Behavior: Myth or Reality?” Psychology of Religion Newsletter 31:1–8.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Shalom H. 2006. “A Theory of Cultural Value Orientations: Explication and Application.” Comparative Sociology 5:137–182.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Shalom H. 1994. “Are There Universal Aspects in the Structure and Contents of Human Values?” Journal of Social Issues 50:19–45.Google Scholar
Shariff, Azim F, and Norenzayan, Ara. 2007. “God Is Watching You: Priming God Concepts Increases Prosocial Behavior in an Anonymous Economic Game.” Psychological Science 18:803–809.Google Scholar
Storm, Ingrid. 2015. “Civic Engagement in Britain: The Role of Religion and Inclusive Values.” European Sociological Review 31:14–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, R. 1996. “Religion as Context: Hellfire and Delinquency One More Time.” Sociology of Religion 57:163–173.Google Scholar
Stark, Rodney, and Bainbridge, William S.. 1996. Religion, Deviance, and Social Control. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tetlock, Philip E., Kristel, Orie V., Elson, S. Beth, Green, Melanie C., and Lerner, Jennifer S.. 2000. “The Psychology of the Unthinkable: Taboo Trade-offs, Forbidden Base Rates, and Heretical Counterfactuals.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 78:853–870.Google Scholar
Tilley, James R. 2005. “Research Note: Libertarian-authoritarian Value Change in Britain, 1974–2001.” Political Studies 53:442–453.Google Scholar
Wuthnow, Robert. 1991. Acts of Compassion: Caring for Others and Helping Ourselves. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Zmerli, Sonja, and Newton, Ken. 2008. “Social Trust and Attitudes Toward Democracy.” Public Opinion Quarterly 72:706–724.Google Scholar